259 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32943137)
1. Challenges in obtaining research ethics and governance approvals for an Australian national intersector, multisite audit study.
Buck K; Nolte L; Kelly H; Detering K; Sinclair C; White BP; Sellars M
Aust Health Rev; 2020 Sep; 44(5):799-805. PubMed ID: 32943137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Inconsistencies and time delays in site-specific research approvals hinder collaborative clinical research in Australia.
White VM; Bibby H; Green M; Anazodo A; Nicholls W; Pinkerton R; Phillips M; Harrup R; Osborn M; Orme LM; Conyers R; Thompson K; Coory M
Intern Med J; 2016 Sep; 46(9):1023-9. PubMed ID: 27396473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-centre ethics and research governance review can impede non-interventional clinical research.
Duplancic C; Crough T; Bell SC;
Intern Med J; 2019 Jun; 49(6):722-728. PubMed ID: 30417974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Research governance authorisation: the next frontier.
Hollingworth S; Mckavanagh D; McPherson I; Walpole E; Yu SY
Aust Health Rev; 2021 Jun; 45(3):389-392. PubMed ID: 33503401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical issues: the multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS.
Vaughan G; Pollock W; Peek MJ; Knight M; Ellwood D; Homer CS; Pulver LJ; McLintock C; Ho MT; Sullivan EA
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 52(2):195-203. PubMed ID: 22188386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Research approvals iceberg: how a 'low-key' study in England needed 89 professionals to approve it and how we can do better.
Petrova M; Barclay S
BMC Med Ethics; 2019 Jan; 20(1):7. PubMed ID: 30678668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Ethics and governance for a multi-site study in Australia: Navigating the snakes and ladders.
Samir N; Amarasena L; Sealy L; Hodgins M; Gelaw Y; Lingam R; Zwi K
J Paediatr Child Health; 2022 Jan; 58(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 34529302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Governance approval for multisite, non-interventional research: what can Harmonisation of Multi-Centre Ethical Review learn from the New South Wales experience?
Vajdic CM; Meagher NS; Hicks SC; Faedo M; Ward RL; Pearson SA
Intern Med J; 2012 Feb; 42(2):127-31. PubMed ID: 21241439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors influencing the time to ethics and governance approvals for clinical trials: a retrospective cross-sectional survey.
Crosby S; Malavisi A; Huang L; Jan S; Holden R; Neal B
Trials; 2023 Dec; 24(1):779. PubMed ID: 38041126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variation in Human Research Ethics Committee and governance processes throughout Australia: a need for a uniform approach.
Dudi-Venkata NN; Cox DRA; Marson N; Tan L; Pockney P; Muralidharan V; Watson DI; Richards T;
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Nov; 91(11):2263-2268. PubMed ID: 33851489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Heterogeneity of Human Research Ethics Committees and Research Governance Offices across Australia: An observational study.
De Smit E; Kearns LS; Clarke L; Dick J; Hill CL; Hewitt AW
Australas Med J; 2016; 9(2):33-9. PubMed ID: 26989449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Research governance as a facilitator for ethical and timely research? Learning from the experience of a large government-funded multisite research project.
Smith-Merry JL; Walton MM
Aust Health Rev; 2014 Jun; 38(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 24870355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A case study evaluation of ethics review systems for multicentre clinical trials.
Hicks SC; James RE; Wong N; Tebbutt NC; Wilson K;
Med J Aust; 2009 Sep; 191(5):280-2. PubMed ID: 19740053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. One stop or full stop? The continuing challenges for researchers despite the new streamlined NHS research governance process.
Thompson AG; France EF
BMC Health Serv Res; 2010 May; 10():124. PubMed ID: 20465819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Obtaining medical ethical approval for a multicentre, randomised study: prospective evaluation of a ponderous process].
van Santvoort HC; Besselink MG; Gooszen HG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2077-83. PubMed ID: 18837184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Situation analysis of research ethics governance in Pakistan.
Jafarey A; Shekhani S; Raza F; Naz S
East Mediterr Health J; 2023 Jul; 29(7):500-507. PubMed ID: 37553736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bureaucracy stifles medical research in Britain: a tale of three trials.
Snooks H; Hutchings H; Seagrove A; Stewart-Brown S; Williams J; Russell I
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():122. PubMed ID: 22898336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research governance delays for a multicentre non-interventional study.
Mallick AA; O'Callaghan FJ
J R Soc Med; 2009 May; 102(5):195-8. PubMed ID: 19417052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.
Sarson-Lawrence M; Alt C; Mok MT; Dodds M; Rosenthal MA
Intern Med J; 2004 Nov; 34(11):598-603. PubMed ID: 15546452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ethical dilemmas of a large national multi-centre study in Australia: time for some consistency.
Driscoll A; Currey J; Worrall-Carter L; Stewart S
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Aug; 17(16):2212-20. PubMed ID: 18705740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
