These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32943960)

  • 1. Accurate Detection of Non-Cavitated Proximal Caries in Posterior Permanent Teeth: An in vivo Study.
    Alammar R; Sadaf D
    Risk Manag Healthc Policy; 2020; 13():1431-1436. PubMed ID: 32943960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of Proximal Caries Detection in Primary Teeth between Laser Fluorescence and Bitewing Radiography: An in vivo Study.
    Mepparambath R; S Bhat S; K Hegde S; Anjana G; Sunil M; Mathew S
    Int J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2014; 7(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 25709294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The diagnostic accuracy of a laser fluorescence device and digital radiography in detecting approximal caries lesions in posterior permanent teeth: an in vivo study.
    Menem R; Barngkgei I; Beiruti N; Al Haffar I; Joury E
    Lasers Med Sci; 2017 Apr; 32(3):621-628. PubMed ID: 28194533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of proximal caries detection in primary teeth between laser fluorescence and bitewing radiography.
    Virajsilp V; Thearmontree A; Aryatawong S; Paiboonwarachat D
    Pediatr Dent; 2005; 27(6):493-9. PubMed ID: 16532891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clinical performance of clinical-visual examination, digital bitewing radiography, laser fluorescence, and near-infrared light transillumination for detection of non-cavitated proximal enamel and dentin caries.
    Kocak N; Cengiz-Yanardag E
    Lasers Med Sci; 2020 Sep; 35(7):1621-1628. PubMed ID: 32333336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of validity of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods for detection of occlusal caries in primary molars using the histological gold standard: an in vivo study.
    Goel A; Chawla HS; Gauba K; Goyal A
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2009; 27(4):227-34. PubMed ID: 19915274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of the DIAGNOcam and bitewing radiographs in the diagnosis of cavitated proximal carious lesions in primary molars.
    Alamoudi NM; Khan JA; El-Ashiry EA; Felemban OM; Bagher SM; Al-Tuwirqi AA
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Nov; 22(11):1576-1582. PubMed ID: 31719280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. In vitro performance of a pen-type laser fluorescence device and bitewing radiographs for approximal caries detection in permanent and primary teeth.
    de Souza JF; Diniz MB; Boldieri T; Rodrigues JA; Lussi A; de Cássia Loiola Cordeiro R
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):702-10. PubMed ID: 25728100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical study of the use of the laser fluorescence device DIAGNOdent for detection of occlusal caries in children.
    Anttonen V; Seppä L; Hausen H
    Caries Res; 2003; 37(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 12566634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Radiography, Laser Fluorescence and Visual Examination for Diagnosing Incipient Occlusal Caries of Permanent First Molars.
    Bahrololoomi Z; Ezoddini F; Halvani N
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 May; 12(5):324-32. PubMed ID: 26877727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical performance of DIAGnodent in the detection of secondary carious lesions.
    Bamzahim M; Aljehani A; Shi XQ
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2005 Feb; 63(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 16095059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. In Vitro Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of DIAGNOdent and Digital Radiography for Detection of Secondary Proximal Caries Adjacent to Composite Restorations.
    Ghoncheh Z; Zonouzy Z; Kiomarsi N; Kharazifar MJ; Chiniforush N
    J Lasers Med Sci; 2017; 8(4):172-176. PubMed ID: 29071022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In Vitro Comparison of Several Methods for Initial Proximal Caries Detection.
    Todorova V; Filipov I; Petrova R
    Folia Med (Plovdiv); 2020 Jun; 62(2):358-364. PubMed ID: 32666744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An In Vitro Validation of DIAGNOdent Versus Radiography for the Detection of Caries Underneath Different Types of Restorations.
    Mohamed OS; Almaz SI; Moustafa NR; Ibrahim AA; Hall MA; Karawia I
    Cureus; 2024 Jul; 16(7):e63689. PubMed ID: 39092343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The validity of laser fluorescence (LF) and near-infrared reflection (NIRR) in detecting early proximal cavities.
    Ahrari F; Akbari M; Mohammadi M; Fallahrastegar A; Najafi MN
    Clin Oral Investig; 2021 Aug; 25(8):4817-4824. PubMed ID: 33751220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Visual-tactile examination compared with conventional radiography, digital radiography, and Diagnodent in the diagnosis of occlusal occult caries in extracted premolars.
    Chong MJ; Seow WK; Purdie DM; Cheng E; Wan V
    Pediatr Dent; 2003; 25(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 13678099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Intraoral versus extraoral bitewing radiography in detection of enamel proximal caries: an ex vivo study.
    Abu El-Ela WH; Farid MM; Mostafa MS
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(4):20150326. PubMed ID: 26892946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Secondary caries detection by DIAGNOdent and radiography: a comparative in vitro study.
    Bamzahim M; Shi XQ; Angmar-Månsson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2004 Feb; 62(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 15124784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accuracy of Digital Bitewing Radiography versus Different Views of Digital Panoramic Radiography for Detection of Proximal Caries.
    Abdinian M; Razavi SM; Faghihian R; Samety AA; Faghihian E
    J Dent (Tehran); 2015 Apr; 12(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 26622284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical validation of near-infrared light transillumination for early proximal caries detection using a composite reference standard.
    Stratigaki E; Jost FN; Kühnisch J; Litzenburger F; Lussi A; Neuhaus KW
    J Dent; 2020; 103S():100025. PubMed ID: 34059307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.