These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32944122)

  • 1. 'My Brain Made Me Do It?' Reflections on the Role of Neuroscience in Assessing Criminal Responsibility - A South African Medico-legal Perspective.
    Stevens GP
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(2):202-213. PubMed ID: 32944122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The mirror has two faces: dissociative identity disorder and the defence of pathological criminal incapacity--a South African criminal law perspective.
    Stevens P
    Med Law; 2013 Mar; 32(1):33-52. PubMed ID: 23781763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Neuroscience in the Courtroom: From responsibility to dangerousness, ethical issues raised by the new French law].
    Gkotsi GM; Moulin V; Gasser J
    Encephale; 2015 Oct; 41(5):385-93. PubMed ID: 25439859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Mother's Love? Postpartum Disorders, the DSM-5 and Criminal Responsibility - A South African Medicolegal Perspective.
    Stevens GP
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2018; 25(2):186-196. PubMed ID: 31984015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Neuroscience, criminal responsibility and sentencing in an islamic country: Iran.
    Alimardani A
    J Law Biosci; 2018 Dec; 5(3):724-742. PubMed ID: 31143460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ethical Issues Pertaining to Forensic Assessments in Mental Capacity Proceedings: Reflections from South Africa.
    Stevens P
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2017; 24(4):628-639. PubMed ID: 31983978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can neurological evidence help courts assess criminal responsibility? Lessons from law and neuroscience.
    Aharoni E; Funk C; Sinnott-Armstrong W; Gazzaniga M
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Mar; 1124():145-60. PubMed ID: 18400929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neuroscience in forensic psychiatry: From responsibility to dangerousness. Ethical and legal implications of using neuroscience for dangerousness assessments.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 46():58-67. PubMed ID: 27209602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adjudicating pathological criminal incapacity within a climate of ultimate issue barriers: a comparative perspective.
    Stevens GP
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2015; 38():29-37. PubMed ID: 25681851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of neuroscientific evidence in Canadian criminal proceedings.
    Chandler JA
    J Law Biosci; 2015 Nov; 2(3):550-579. PubMed ID: 27774212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Criminal Responsibility and Neuroscience: No Revolution Yet.
    Bigenwald A; Chambon V
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1406. PubMed ID: 31316418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. HANNIBAL REVISITED: ANTISOCIAL PERSONALITY DISORDER VERSUS PSYCHOPATHY--MEDICO-LEGAL PERSPECTIVES FROM SOUTH AFRICA.
    Stevens P
    Med Law; 2014 Jul; 33(2):113-41. PubMed ID: 27359011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Paraphilia and sex offending - A South African criminal law perspective.
    Carstens P; Stevens P
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():93-101. PubMed ID: 27182003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The United Nations convention on the rights of persons with disabilities, neuroscience, and criminal legal capacity.
    Barsky BA; Stein MA
    J Law Biosci; 2023; 10(1):lsad010. PubMed ID: 37214222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.
    Cobun LS
    Am J Law Med; 1984; 9(4):471-500. PubMed ID: 6486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Impulse control and criminal responsibility: lessons from neuroscience.
    Penney S
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 22261322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In defense of free will: Neuroscience and criminal responsibility.
    Nestor PG
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101344. PubMed ID: 29685647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neuroimaging in criminal trials and the role of psychiatrists expert witnesses: A case study.
    Gkotsi GM; Gasser J; Moulin V
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2019; 65():101359. PubMed ID: 29909218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neuroscientific and behavioral genetic information in criminal cases in the Netherlands.
    de Kogel CH; Westgeest EJ
    J Law Biosci; 2015 Nov; 2(3):580-605. PubMed ID: 27774213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What does recent neuroscience tell us about criminal responsibility?
    Maoz U; Yaffe G
    J Law Biosci; 2016 Apr; 3(1):120-139. PubMed ID: 27774235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.