These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32944480)
1. Catgut Versus Polypropylene Sutures for Transcolumellar Incision Closure in Open Rhinoplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study. Aldhabaan S; Hudise JY; ALqarny M; Alarfaj A Cureus; 2020 Aug; 12(8):e9769. PubMed ID: 32944480 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rapid Resorbable Sutures Are a Favourable Alternative to Non-resorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Rhinoplasty. Alinasab B; Haraldsson PO Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Aug; 40(4):449-52. PubMed ID: 27251749 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Rapid Absorbable Sutures with Nonabsorbable Sutures in Closing Transcolumellar Incision in Septorhinoplasty: Short-term Outcomes. Erol O; Buyuklu F; Koycu A; Jafarov S; Gultekin G; Erbek SS Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2020 Oct; 44(5):1759-1765. PubMed ID: 32700009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Advocating the Use of Absorbable Sutures for Columellar Incisions Following Open Rhinoplasty. Beegun I; Saleh HA Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2017 Jun; 41(3):754. PubMed ID: 28204928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Columellar Scar Following Open Rhinoplasty Using Absorbable Suture Versus Nonabsorbable Suture: A Meta-Analysis. Kenny H; Jonas RH; Oyer S Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2023; 25(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 34516890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison Between Using Monocryl Suture and Polypropylene Suture in Closure of Alar Base Excision in Rhinoplasty. Aldhabaan SA; Hudise JY; Aldosari BF Plast Surg (Oakv); 2022 Feb; 30(1):59-62. PubMed ID: 35096694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Patient and Observer Graded Rhinoplasty Scar Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Fast Absorbing Versus Permanent Columellar Suture Closure. Jonas RH; Patel KG; Rist TM; Walker ER; Oyer SL Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med; 2022; 24(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 34495754 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Absorbable Versus Non-Absorbable Sutures in Open Rhinoplasty: Analysis of Columellar Scarring. Bozan A; Dizdar D J Craniofac Surg; 2021 May; 32(3):1075-1078. PubMed ID: 33405440 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The open approach in secondary rhinoplasty: choosing an incision regardless of prior placement. Unger JG; Roostaeian J; Cheng DH; Geissler P; Lee MR; Narasimhan K; Rohrich RJ Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Oct; 132(4):780-786. PubMed ID: 23676971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Absorbable and Nonabsorbable Sutures in Columellar Incision Closure in Rhinoplasty and Their Effects to Postoperative Scar. Kilavuz AE; Bayram AA; Serin GM Facial Plast Surg; 2017 Dec; 33(6):661-664. PubMed ID: 29195248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized, controlled trial comparing long-term cosmetic outcomes of traumatic pediatric lacerations repaired with absorbable plain gut versus nonabsorbable nylon sutures. Karounis H; Gouin S; Eisman H; Chalut D; Pelletier H; Williams B Acad Emerg Med; 2004 Jul; 11(7):730-5. PubMed ID: 15231459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A new consideration of scar formation in open rhinoplasty. Inanli S; Sari M; Yanik M J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 20(4):1228-30. PubMed ID: 19553831 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]