These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32944959)

  • 1. Visual load does not decrease the auditory steady-state response to 40-Hz amplitude-modulated tones.
    Szychowska M; Wiens S
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Dec; 57(12):e13689. PubMed ID: 32944959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visual load effects on the auditory steady-state responses to 20-, 40-, and 80-Hz amplitude-modulated tones.
    Szychowska M; Wiens S
    Physiol Behav; 2021 Jan; 228():113240. PubMed ID: 33188789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The modulation of auditory novelty processing by working memory load in school age children and adults: a combined behavioral and event-related potential study.
    Ruhnau P; Wetzel N; Widmann A; Schröger E
    BMC Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 11():126. PubMed ID: 20929535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The medial olivocochlear reflex strength is modulated during a visual working memory task.
    Marcenaro B; Leiva A; Dragicevic C; López V; Delano PH
    J Neurophysiol; 2021 Jun; 125(6):2309-2321. PubMed ID: 33978484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A crossmodal crossover: opposite effects of visual and auditory perceptual load on steady-state evoked potentials to irrelevant visual stimuli.
    Jacoby O; Hall SE; Mattingley JB
    Neuroimage; 2012 Jul; 61(4):1050-8. PubMed ID: 22465299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory processing under cross-modal visual load investigated with simultaneous EEG-fMRI.
    Regenbogen C; De Vos M; Debener S; Turetsky BI; Mössnang C; Finkelmeyer A; Habel U; Neuner I; Kellermann T
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e52267. PubMed ID: 23251704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. P300 as a measure of processing capacity in auditory and visual domains in specific language impairment.
    Evans JL; Selinger C; Pollak SD
    Brain Res; 2011 May; 1389():93-102. PubMed ID: 21316354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of visual task difficulty and attentional direction on the detection of acoustic change as indexed by the Mismatch Negativity.
    Muller-Gass A; Stelmack RM; Campbell KB
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1078(1):112-30. PubMed ID: 16497283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.
    Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hänninen JL; Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Lampinen J; Sams M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46872. PubMed ID: 23071654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The differential effects of Sternberg short- and long-term memory scanning on the late Nd and P300 in a dual-task paradigm.
    Singhal A; Fowler B
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Sep; 21(1):124-32. PubMed ID: 15325420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The electrophysiological effect of working memory load on involuntary attention in an auditory-visual distraction paradigm: an ERP study.
    Lv JY; Wang T; Qiu J; Feng SH; Tu S; Wei DT
    Exp Brain Res; 2010 Aug; 205(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 20628735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory Task Irrelevance: A Basis for Inattentional Deafness.
    Scheer M; Bülthoff HH; Chuang LL
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):428-440. PubMed ID: 29578754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of attention on 40Hz auditory steady-state response depends on the stimulation type: Flutter amplitude modulated tones versus clicks.
    Voicikas A; Niciute I; Ruksenas O; Griskova-Bulanova I
    Neurosci Lett; 2016 Aug; 629():215-220. PubMed ID: 27424792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive resources are distributed among the entire auditory landscape in auditory scene analysis.
    Symonds RM; Zhou JW; Cole SL; Brace KM; Sussman ES
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Feb; 57(2):e13487. PubMed ID: 31578762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of mental workload with task-irrelevant auditory probes.
    Kramer AF; Trejo LJ; Humphrey D
    Biol Psychol; 1995 May; 40(1-2):83-100. PubMed ID: 7647188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Selective attention in schizophrenia: sparing and loss of executive control.
    Mathalon DH; Heinks T; Ford JM
    Am J Psychiatry; 2004 May; 161(5):872-81. PubMed ID: 15121653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus train duration but not attention moderates γ-band entrainment abnormalities in schizophrenia.
    Hamm JP; Bobilev AM; Hayrynen LK; Hudgens-Haney ME; Oliver WT; Parker DA; McDowell JE; Buckley PA; Clementz BA
    Schizophr Res; 2015 Jun; 165(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 25868936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Memory Load Alters Perception-Related Neural Oscillations during Multisensory Integration.
    Michail G; Senkowski D; Niedeggen M; Keil J
    J Neurosci; 2021 Feb; 41(7):1505-1515. PubMed ID: 33310755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.