These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3294507)

  • 1. Use of adaptive digital signal processing to improve speech communication for normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Harris RW; Brey RH; Robinette MS; Chabries DM; Christiansen RW; Jolley RG
    J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Jun; 31(2):265-71. PubMed ID: 3294507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
    Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio.
    McShefferty D; Whitmer WM; Akeroyd MA
    Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving word recognition in noise among hearing-impaired subjects with a single-channel cochlear noise-reduction algorithm.
    Fink N; Furst M; Muchnik C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1718-31. PubMed ID: 22978899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Do adaptive frequency response (AFR) hearing aids reduce 'upward spread' of masking?
    Fabry DA; Leek MR; Walden BE; Cord M
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 8126656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Masking of speech by amplitude-modulated noise.
    Gustafsson HA; Arlinger SD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):518-29. PubMed ID: 8120263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of low-pass noise in word-recognition testing.
    Cohen RL; Keith RW
    J Speech Hear Res; 1976 Mar; 19(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 1271800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors governing speech reception benefits of adaptive linear filtering for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Rankovic CM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Feb; 103(2):1043-57. PubMed ID: 9479758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment.
    Wardenga N; Batsoulis C; Wagener KC; Brand T; Lenarz T; Maier H
    Int J Audiol; 2015; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Monosyllabic word recognition at higher-than-normal speech and noise levels.
    Studebaker GA; Sherbecoe RL; McDaniel DM; Gwaltney CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Apr; 105(4):2431-44. PubMed ID: 10212424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Large-scale training to increase speech intelligibility for hearing-impaired listeners in novel noises.
    Chen J; Wang Y; Yoho SE; Wang D; Healy EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 May; 139(5):2604. PubMed ID: 27250154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A word-recognition task in multitalker babble using a descending presentation mode from 24 dB to 0 dB signal to babble.
    Wilson RH; Abrams HB; Pillion AL
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2003; 40(4):321-7. PubMed ID: 15074443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Influence of Native and Non-Native Multitalker Babble on Speech Recognition in Noise.
    Jain C; Konadath S; Vimal BM; Suresh V
    Audiol Res; 2014 Mar; 4(1):89. PubMed ID: 26557350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2003 Nov; 14(9):453-70. PubMed ID: 14708835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship Among Signal Fidelity, Hearing Loss, and Working Memory for Digital Noise Suppression.
    Arehart K; Souza P; Kates J; Lunner T; Pedersen MS
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):505-16. PubMed ID: 25985016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improvement in speech intelligibility in noise employing an adaptive filter with normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Brey RH; Robinette MS; Chabries DM; Christiansen RW
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):75-86. PubMed ID: 3430392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Binaural Pre-processing Strategies III: Speech Intelligibility of Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
    Völker C; Warzybok A; Ernst SM
    Trends Hear; 2015 Dec; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A single-microphone-based self-adaptive filter of noise from speech and its performance evaluation.
    Graupe D; Grosspietsch JK; Basseas SP
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1987; 24(4):119-26. PubMed ID: 3430371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cingulo-Opercular Function During Word Recognition in Noise for Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Vaden KI; Kuchinsky SE; Ahlstrom JB; Teubner-Rhodes SE; Dubno JR; Eckert MA
    Exp Aging Res; 2016; 42(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 26683042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.