These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32945090)

  • 1. Urological and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.
    Wee IJY; Kuo LJ; Ngu JC
    Int J Med Robot; 2021 Feb; 17(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 32945090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Possible benefits of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery regarding urological and sexual dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Broholm M; Pommergaard HC; Gögenür I
    Colorectal Dis; 2015 May; 17(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 25515638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Urogenital function following robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: meta-analysis.
    Fleming CA; Cullinane C; Lynch N; Killeen S; Coffey JC; Peirce CB
    Br J Surg; 2021 Mar; 108(2):128-137. PubMed ID: 33711141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Urinary and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhu L; Li X; Zhang H; Li H; Shen X
    J Robot Surg; 2024 Jun; 18(1):262. PubMed ID: 38907844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Urogenital function in robotic vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study.
    Panteleimonitis S; Ahmed J; Ramachandra M; Farooq M; Harper M; Parvaiz A
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2017 Feb; 32(2):241-248. PubMed ID: 27770247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparing pathologic outcomes for robotic versus laparoscopic Surgery in rectal cancer resection: a propensity adjusted analysis of 7616 patients.
    Hopkins MB; Geiger TM; Bethurum AJ; Ford MM; Muldoon RL; Beck DE; Stewart TG; Hawkins AT
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2613-2622. PubMed ID: 31346754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The urinary and sexual outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Yang H; Zhou L
    Surg Today; 2024 May; 54(5):397-406. PubMed ID: 36943447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in male urogenital function preservation, a meta-analysis.
    Tang X; Wang Z; Wu X; Yang M; Wang D
    World J Surg Oncol; 2018 Oct; 16(1):196. PubMed ID: 30285780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of long-term survival and urogenital functional outcomes.
    Li X; Liu ZH; Wang N; Ding J; Fan F; Cen XY; Wu M; Mi R; Liu H; Zhang YL
    Minerva Gastroenterol (Torino); 2023 Sep; 69(3):403-411. PubMed ID: 33860661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcome.
    Trastulli S; Farinella E; Cirocchi R; Cavaliere D; Avenia N; Sciannameo F; Gullà N; Noya G; Boselli C
    Colorectal Dis; 2012 Apr; 14(4):e134-56. PubMed ID: 22151033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery.
    Kim HJ; Choi GS; Park JS; Park SY; Yang CS; Lee HJ
    Colorectal Dis; 2018 May; 20(5):O103-O113. PubMed ID: 29460997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: An Update in 2015.
    Kwak JM; Kim SH
    Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Apr; 48(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 26875201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of robotic rectal surgery on sexual and urinary functions in male patients.
    Ozeki S; Maeda K; Hanai T; Masumori K; Katsuno H; Takahashi H
    Surg Today; 2016 Apr; 46(4):491-500. PubMed ID: 26198896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with partial preservation of Denonvilliers fascia: a comparative study of short-term efficacy and urinary and erectile function].
    Huang ZK; Chi P; Huang Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 24(4):327-334. PubMed ID: 33878822
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Patient-Related Functional Outcomes After Robotic-Assisted Rectal Surgery Compared With a Laparoscopic Approach: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Flynn J; Larach JT; Kong JCH; Waters PS; McCormick JJ; Warrier SK; Heriot A
    Dis Colon Rectum; 2022 Oct; 65(10):1191-1204. PubMed ID: 35853177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.
    Phan K; Kahlaee HR; Kim SH; Toh JWT
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Mar; 23(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30623315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Invited Commentary on "Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis".
    Chisthi MM
    Int J Surg; 2020 Jun; 78():89-90. PubMed ID: 32330659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Tang B; Lei X; Ai J; Huang Z; Shi J; Li T
    World J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 19(1):38. PubMed ID: 33536032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The risk of conversion in minimally invasive oncological abdominal surgery. Meta-analysis of randomized evidence comparing traditional laparoscopic versus robot-assisted techniques.
    Guerra F; Giuliani G; Coletta D
    Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2021 May; 406(3):607-612. PubMed ID: 33743066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term and long-term efficacy in robot-assisted treatment for mid and low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wu H; Guo R; Li H
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2023 Dec; 39(1):7. PubMed ID: 38127156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.