These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3294596)

  • 21. A comparison of 3 methods of face-bow transfer recording: implications for orthognathic surgery.
    Gateno J; Forrest KK; Camp B
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jun; 59(6):635-40; discussion 640-1. PubMed ID: 11381385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The reduction of the dose to patients during lateral cephalometric radiography. Report of a Joint Working Party of the British Society for the Study of Orthodontics and the British Society of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology.
    Br J Orthod; 1985 Oct; 12(4):176-8. PubMed ID: 3863672
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The cant of the occlusal plane and distortion in the panoramic radiograph.
    Philipp RG; Hurst RV
    Angle Orthod; 1978 Oct; 48(4):317-23. PubMed ID: 281889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Measurement accuracy with a new dental panoramic radiographic technique based on tomosynthesis.
    Kitai N; Mukai Y; Murabayashi M; Kawabata A; Washino K; Matsuoka M; Shimizu I; Katsumata A
    Angle Orthod; 2013 Jan; 83(1):117-26. PubMed ID: 22612390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Evaluation of Class II treatment by cephalometric regional superpositions versus conventional measurements.
    Efstratiadis S; Baumrind S; Shofer F; Jacobsson-Hunt U; Laster L; Ghafari J
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Nov; 128(5):607-18. PubMed ID: 16286208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Anatomically shaped cranial collimation (ACC) for lateral cephalometric radiography: a technical report.
    Hoogeveen RC; van der Stelt PF; Berkhout WE
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2014; 43(1):20130203. PubMed ID: 24170799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Digitalizing in the orthodontic practice].
    Schols JG
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2003 Jan; 110(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 15004986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Maxillary sinus osteoma: A case report and literature review.
    Hania M; Sharif MO
    J Orthod; 2020 Sep; 47(3):240-244. PubMed ID: 32597360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.
    Del Santo M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):641-8. PubMed ID: 16679204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Reliability and validity of the Digigraph 100 in orthodontic diagnosis.
    Doll GM; Zentner A; Krummenauer F; Gärtner H
    J Orofac Orthop; 2001 Mar; 62(2):116-32. PubMed ID: 11304928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of hand-traced and computerized cephalograms: landmark identification, measurement, and superimposition accuracy.
    Roden-Johnson D; English J; Gallerano R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):556-64. PubMed ID: 18405820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [The influence of occlusal interferences on pulp vitality threshold in permanent dentition].
    Hejne AJ
    Ann Acad Med Stetin; 2003; 49():277-89. PubMed ID: 15552853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Craniofacial imaging in orthodontics: historical perspective, current status, and future developments.
    Quintero JC; Trosien A; Hatcher D; Kapila S
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Dec; 69(6):491-506. PubMed ID: 10593439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of radiation levels from computed tomography and conventional dental radiographs.
    Ngan DC; Kharbanda OP; Geenty JP; Darendeliler MA
    Aust Orthod J; 2003 Nov; 19(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 14703331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Implementation of a Digital Radiographic Image Acquisition and Retrieval System (DRIARS) using a wireless network in an orthodontic department.
    Mupparapu M; Binder RE; Cummins JM; Feldman CA; Cappelli MA; Matheson PB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2008 May; 9(4):115-23. PubMed ID: 18473035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of differences in landmark identification on the cephalometric measurements in traditional versus digitized cephalometry.
    Chen YJ; Chen SK; Yao JC; Chang HF
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Apr; 74(2):155-61. PubMed ID: 15132440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Surgical cephalometric prediction tracing for the alteration of the occlusal plane by means of rotation of the maxillomandibular complex.
    Reyneke JP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(1):55-64. PubMed ID: 10337251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Computer supported tele-X-ray diagnostics in maxillary orthodontics].
    Harzer W; Reinhardt A; Dramm P; Rädlinger J
    Stomatol DDR; 1989 Mar; 39(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 2683241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Panoramic and cephalometric extraoral dental radiograph systems.
    American Dental Association, Council on Dental Materials, Instruments and Equipment
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Dec; 133(12):1696-7. PubMed ID: 12512672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Radiographic modalities for diagnosis and treatment planning in implant dentistry.
    Garg AK; Vicari A
    Implant Soc; 1995; 5(5):7-11. PubMed ID: 9571835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.