These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32946521)
1. What drives and inhibits researchers to share and use open research data? A systematic literature review to analyze factors influencing open research data adoption. Zuiderwijk A; Shinde R; Jeng W PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239283. PubMed ID: 32946521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. First Do No Harm: Ethical Concerns of Health Researchers That Discourage the Sharing of Results With Research Participants. Purvis RS; Long CR; Eisenberg LR; Hester DM; Cunningham TV; Holland A; Chatrathi HE; McElfish PA AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2020; 11(2):104-113. PubMed ID: 32163009 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Research Stakeholders' Views on Benefits and Challenges for Public Health Research Data Sharing in Kenya: The Importance of Trust and Social Relations. Jao I; Kombe F; Mwalukore S; Bull S; Parker M; Kamuya D; Molyneux S; Marsh V PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0135545. PubMed ID: 26331716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data sharing as social dilemma: Influence of the researcher's personality. Linek SB; Fecher B; Friesike S; Hebing M PLoS One; 2017; 12(8):e0183216. PubMed ID: 28817642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When are researchers willing to share their data? - Impacts of values and uncertainty on open data in academia. Stieglitz S; Wilms K; Mirbabaie M; Hofeditz L; Brenger B; López A; Rehwald S PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0234172. PubMed ID: 32609767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A data-sharing agreement helps to increase researchers' willingness to share primary data: results from a randomized controlled trial. Polanin JR; Terzian M J Clin Epidemiol; 2019 Feb; 106():60-69. PubMed ID: 30342969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When you are making plans to publish research, you need to plan for data sharing. Bell RJ; Haring R Climacteric; 2020 Oct; 23(5):466-467. PubMed ID: 32452703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Best Practices for Ethical Sharing of Individual-Level Health Research Data From Low- and Middle-Income Settings. Bull S; Cheah PY; Denny S; Jao I; Marsh V; Merson L; Shah More N; Nhan le NT; Osrin D; Tangseefa D; Wassenaar D; Parker M J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Jul; 10(3):302-13. PubMed ID: 26297751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Research data sharing in the Australian national science agency: Understanding the relative importance of organisational, disciplinary and domain-specific influences. Mason CM; Box PJ; Burns SM PLoS One; 2020; 15(8):e0238071. PubMed ID: 32857794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. "That is why I have trust": unpacking what 'trust' means to participants in international genetic research in Pakistan and Denmark. Sheikh Z; Hoeyer K Med Health Care Philos; 2018 Jun; 21(2):169-179. PubMed ID: 28875227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Between Scylla and Charybdis: reconciling competing data management demands in the life sciences. Bezuidenhout LM; Morrison M BMC Med Ethics; 2016 May; 17(1):29. PubMed ID: 27184750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Sweat, Skepticism, and Uncharted Territory: A Qualitative Study of Opinions on Data Sharing Among Public Health Researchers and Research Participants in Mumbai, India. Hate K; Meherally S; Shah More N; Jayaraman A; Bull S; Parker M; Osrin D J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Jul; 10(3):239-50. PubMed ID: 26297746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The increasingly compelling moral responsibilities of life scientists. Relman DA Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; 43(2):34-5. PubMed ID: 23494700 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. "You cannot collect data using your own resources and put It on open access": Perspectives from Africa about public health data-sharing. Anane-Sarpong E; Wangmo T; Ward CL; Sankoh O; Tanner M; Elger BS Dev World Bioeth; 2018 Dec; 18(4):394-405. PubMed ID: 28745008 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Perspectives of Singaporean biomedical researchers and research support staff on actual and ideal IRB review functions and characteristics: A quantitative analysis. Labude MK; Shen L; Zhu Y; Schaefer GO; Ong C; Xafis V PLoS One; 2020; 15(12):e0241783. PubMed ID: 33382683 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Knowing who to trust: exploring the role of 'ethical metadata' in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa. de Vries J; Williams TN; Bojang K; Kwiatkowski DP; Fitzpatrick R; Parker M BMC Med Ethics; 2014 Aug; 15():62. PubMed ID: 25124199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trust, Respect, and Reciprocity: Informing Culturally Appropriate Data-Sharing Practice in Vietnam. Merson L; Phong TV; Nhan le NT; Dung NT; Ngan TT; Kinh NV; Parker M; Bull S J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2015 Jul; 10(3):251-63. PubMed ID: 26297747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. "It's all about trust": reflections of researchers on the complexity and controversy surrounding biobanking in South Africa. Moodley K; Singh S BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Oct; 17(1):57. PubMed ID: 27724893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. What drives academic data sharing? Fecher B; Friesike S; Hebing M PLoS One; 2015; 10(2):e0118053. PubMed ID: 25714752 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Medical Researchers' Ancillary Care Obligations: The Relationship-Based Approach. Olson NW Bioethics; 2016 Jun; 30(5):317-24. PubMed ID: 26424512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]