131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32946908)
1. Impact of Early Confirmatory Tests on Upgrading and Conversion to Treatment in Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance.
Ginsburg KB; Jacobs JC; Qi J; Kaye DR; Eggly SS; Linsell SM; Auffenberg GB; George AK; Montie JE; Cher ML;
Urology; 2021 Jan; 147():213-222. PubMed ID: 32946908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Obesity is associated with risk of progression for low-risk prostate cancers managed expectantly.
Bhindi B; Kulkarni GS; Finelli A; Alibhai SM; Hamilton RJ; Toi A; van der Kwast TH; Evans A; Hersey K; Jewett MA; Zlotta AR; Trachtenberg J; Fleshner NE
Eur Urol; 2014 Nov; 66(5):841-8. PubMed ID: 24954793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Multivariable Approach Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Avoid a Protocol-based Prostate Biopsy in Men on Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer-Data from the International Multicenter Prospective PRIAS Study.
Luiting HB; Remmers S; Boevé ER; Valdagni R; Chiu PK; Semjonow A; Berge V; Tully KH; Rannikko AS; Staerman F; Roobol MJ
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Dec; 5(6):651-658. PubMed ID: 35437217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Upgrading on Per Protocol versus For Cause surveillance prostate biopsies: An opportunity to decreasing the burden of active surveillance.
Wang M; Lange A; Perlman D; Qi J; George AK; Ferrante S; Semerjian A; Sarle R; Cher ML; Ginsburg KB;
Prostate; 2023 Sep; 83(12):1141-1149. PubMed ID: 37173808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Active Surveillance after Initial Surveillance Prostate Biopsy.
Kovac E; Lieser G; Elshafei A; Jones JS; Klein EA; Stephenson AJ
J Urol; 2017 Jan; 197(1):84-89. PubMed ID: 27449260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Role of Surveillance Biopsy with No Cancer as a Prognostic Marker for Reclassification: Results from the Canary Prostate Active Surveillance Study.
Kearns JT; Faino AV; Newcomb LF; Brooks JD; Carroll PR; Dash A; Ellis WJ; Fabrizio M; Gleave ME; Morgan TM; Nelson PS; Thompson IM; Wagner AA; Zheng Y; Lin DW
Eur Urol; 2018 May; 73(5):706-712. PubMed ID: 29433973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Confirmatory Magnetic Resonance Imaging with or without Biopsy Impacts Decision Making in Newly Diagnosed Favorable Risk Prostate Cancer.
Ginsburg KB; Arcot R; Qi J; Linsell SM; Kaye DR; George AK; Cher ML;
J Urol; 2019 May; 201(5):923-928. PubMed ID: 30694939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk Factors for Biopsy Reclassification over Time in Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Lonergan PE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Zhao S; Nguyen HG; Shinohara K; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2020 Dec; 204(6):1216-1221. PubMed ID: 32519915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risk-stratification based on magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific antigen density may reduce unnecessary follow-up biopsy procedures in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer.
Alberts AR; Roobol MJ; Drost FH; van Leenders GJ; Bokhorst LP; Bangma CH; Schoots IG
BJU Int; 2017 Oct; 120(4):511-519. PubMed ID: 28267899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of a negative confirmatory biopsy on risk of disease progression among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer.
Salari K; Kowitz J; Twum-Ampofo J; Gusev A; O'Shea A; Anderson MA; Harisinghani M; Kuppermann D; Dahl DM; Efstathiou JA; Lee RJ; Blute ML; Zietman AL; Feldman AS
Urol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 41(9):387.e9-387.e16. PubMed ID: 37208229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Older Age at Diagnosis and Initial Disease Volume Predict Grade Reclassification Risk on Confirmatory Biopsy in Patients Considered for Active Surveillance.
Dai C; Ganesan V; Nyame YA; Almassi N; Greene DJ; Hettel D; Magi-Galluzzi C; Gong M; Jones JS; Stephenson AJ; Berglund RK; Klein EA
Urology; 2019 Aug; 130():106-112. PubMed ID: 31071349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Age is Associated with Upgrading at Confirmatory Biopsy among Men with Prostate Cancer Treated with Active Surveillance.
Anderson CB; Sternberg IA; Karen-Paz G; Kim PH; Sjoberg D; Vargas HA; Touijer K; Eastham JA; Ehdaie B
J Urol; 2015 Dec; 194(6):1607-11. PubMed ID: 26119671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Role of prostate specific antigen and immediate confirmatory biopsy in predicting progression during active surveillance for low risk prostate cancer.
Adamy A; Yee DS; Matsushita K; Maschino A; Cronin A; Vickers A; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Eastham JA
J Urol; 2011 Feb; 185(2):477-82. PubMed ID: 21167529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Targeted prostate biopsy in select men for active surveillance: do the Epstein criteria still apply?
Hu JC; Chang E; Natarajan S; Margolis DJ; Macairan M; Lieu P; Huang J; Sonn G; Dorey FJ; Marks LS
J Urol; 2014 Aug; 192(2):385-90. PubMed ID: 24512956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stability of a 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score in Serial Testing of Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer.
Cedars BE; Washington SL; Cowan JE; Leapman M; Tenggara I; Chan JM; Cooperberg MR; Carroll PR
J Urol; 2019 Oct; 202(4):696-701. PubMed ID: 30958742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The added influence of genomics and post-MRI confirmatory biopsy results to MRI results alone on medical decision making for men with favorable risk prostate cancer being considered for active surveillance.
Wang M; Qi J; George AK; Semerjian A; Linsell SM; Montie JE; Cher ML; Ginsburg KB;
Prostate; 2022 Jun; 82(10):1068-1074. PubMed ID: 35468226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A negative confirmatory biopsy among men on active surveillance for prostate cancer does not protect them from histologic grade progression.
Wong LM; Alibhai SM; Trottier G; Timilshina N; Van der Kwast T; Zlotta A; Lawrentschuk N; Kulkarni G; Hamilton R; Ferrara S; Margel D; Trachtenberg J; Jewett MA; Toi A; Evans A; Fleshner NE; Finelli A
Eur Urol; 2014 Sep; 66(3):406-13. PubMed ID: 23664820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy a useful addition to systematic confirmatory biopsy in men on active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Nieboer D; Giganti F; Moore CM; Bangma CH; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):946-958. PubMed ID: 29679430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative first follow-up prostate biopsy on active surveillance is associated with decreased risk of upgrading, suspicion of progression and converting to active treatment.
Singh S; Sandhu P; Beckmann K; Santaolalla A; Dewan K; Clovis S; Rusere J; Zisengwe G; Challacombe B; Brown C; Cathcart P; Popert R; Dasgupta P; Van Hemelrijck M; Elhage O
BJU Int; 2021 Jul; 128(1):72-78. PubMed ID: 33098158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of Changes in Magnetic Resonance Imaging or Clinical Stage in Evaluation of Disease Progression for Men with Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance.
Chesnut GT; Vertosick EA; Benfante N; Sjoberg DD; Fainberg J; Lee T; Eastham J; Laudone V; Scardino P; Touijer K; Vickers A; Ehdaie B
Eur Urol; 2020 Apr; 77(4):501-507. PubMed ID: 31874726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
