These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3294697)

  • 1. Scanning electron microscope: an SEM study of periodontally instrumented root surfaces, comparing sharp, dull, and damaged curettes and ultrasonic instruments.
    Benfenati MP; Montesani MT; Roncati M; Nathanson D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 1987; 7(2):50-67. PubMed ID: 3294697
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Tartar removal by hand instruments and by ultrasonic apparatus. Current approaches and recent findings].
    Picarelli A; Alessio R; Fossato L
    Minerva Stomatol; 1984; 33(5):801-9. PubMed ID: 6394984
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A scanning electron micrographical study of root surfaces and subgingival bacteria after hand and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Garnick JJ; Dent J
    J Periodontol; 1989 Aug; 60(8):441-7. PubMed ID: 2689628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Scaling and root polishing with curets and ultrasonic and pneumatic planers: SEM observations of the root surface].
    Picarelli A; Alessio RA; Deli G; Fossato L
    Minerva Stomatol; 1985; 34(4):717-23. PubMed ID: 3900680
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Mechanical preparation of root surfaces: studies with scanning electron and light microscopy. (Comparison of the Piezon and the Air Scaler)].
    De Marchi M; Rabito M; Cordioli GP
    G Stomatol Ortognatodonzia; 1984; 3(3):501-7. PubMed ID: 6399500
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Scanning electron microscopic examination of root surfaces after scaling and root planing].
    Esposito V; Vaia E; Zarone F; Bozzini V
    Minerva Stomatol; 1988 Feb; 37(2):151-7. PubMed ID: 3287128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The periodontal curet and the ultrasonic scaler. Their effectiveness in removing overhangs from amalgam restorations.
    Blanchard JS
    Dent Hyg (Chic); 1984 Oct; 58(10):450-4. PubMed ID: 6386552
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Jacobson L; Blomlöf J; Lindskog S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8085122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Scaling and root planing: principles and modalities].
    Vaia E; Bozzini V; Nicolò M; Riccitiello F
    Minerva Stomatol; 1988 Feb; 37(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 3287126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the effect on root surfaces of air turbine scalers and ultrasonic instrumentation.
    Lie T; Leknes KN
    J Periodontol; 1985 Sep; 56(9):522-31. PubMed ID: 3897504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of instrumentation using curettes, piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler and Er,Cr:YSGG laser on the morphology and adhesion of blood components on root surfaces: a SEM study.
    Tsurumaki Jdo N; Souto BH; Oliveira GJ; Sampaio JE; Marcantonio Júnior E; Marcantonio RA
    Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(3):185-92. PubMed ID: 21915514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Use of the curette and root planing].
    Ceppetelli Caprini B
    Prev Assist Dent; 1990; 16(2):33-4. PubMed ID: 2204047
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative study on the effect of ultrasonic instruments on the root surface in vivo.
    Santos FA; Pochapski MT; Leal PC; Gimenes-Sakima PP; Marcantonio E
    Clin Oral Investig; 2008 Jun; 12(2):143-50. PubMed ID: 18060565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of two ultrasonic instruments on root surfaces.
    Woodruff HC; Levin MP; Brady JM
    J Periodontol; 1975 Feb; 46(2):119-26. PubMed ID: 1090720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative effectiveness of hand and ultrasonic instrumentations in root surface planing in vitro.
    Khosravi M; Bahrami ZS; Atabaki MS; Shokrgozar MA; Shokri F
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):160-5. PubMed ID: 15016018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [A newly designed probe-type tip for ultrasonic scaling. Clinical evaluation after subgingival root debridement].
    Iinuma K; Sugaya T; Tate T; Kawanami M; Kato S; Kato H
    Nihon Shishubyo Gakkai Kaishi; 1988 Sep; 30(3):926-34. PubMed ID: 3075641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ultrasonic root planing. An alternative method versus hand instruments? An in vitro comparison and SEM study].
    van Gogswaardt DC; Behrens VG
    Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl; 1990; 78(5):387-92. PubMed ID: 2150253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Preservation of root cementum: a comparative evaluation of power-driven versus hand instruments.
    Bozbay E; Dominici F; Gokbuget AY; Cintan S; Guida L; Aydin MS; Mariotti A; Pilloni A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2018 May; 16(2):202-209. PubMed ID: 27860247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [An ultrastructural study of root surfaces after scaling].
    Gianni E; Salvato A; Loiaconi G; Mattei R
    Mondo Odontostomatol; 1984; 26(2):45-52. PubMed ID: 6392858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.