187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32947624)
1. Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) compared with conventional ESD for colorectal lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
McCarty TR; Bazarbashi AN; Thompson CC; Aihara H
Endoscopy; 2021 Oct; 53(10):1048-1058. PubMed ID: 32947624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Efficacy of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a rescue treatment in difficult colorectal ESD cases.
Okamoto K; Muguruma N; Kagemoto K; Mitsui Y; Fujimoto D; Kitamura S; Kimura T; Sogabe M; Miyamoto H; Takayama T
Dig Endosc; 2017 Apr; 29 Suppl 2():45-52. PubMed ID: 28425649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endoscopic submucosal dissection
Lim XC; Nistala KRY; Ng CH; Lin SY; Tan DJH; Ho KY; Chong CS; Muthiah M
World J Gastroenterol; 2021 Jul; 27(25):3925-3939. PubMed ID: 34321855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Long-term clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia with or without the hybrid technique.
Kang DU; Park JC; Hwang SW; Park SH; Yang DH; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Byeon JS
Colorectal Dis; 2020 Dec; 22(12):2008-2017. PubMed ID: 32866340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions: A systematic review.
De Ceglie A; Hassan C; Mangiavillano B; Matsuda T; Saito Y; Ridola L; Bhandari P; Boeri F; Conio M
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol; 2016 Aug; 104():138-55. PubMed ID: 27370173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Resection outcomes and recurrence rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and hybrid ESD for colorectal tumors in a single Italian center.
Milano RV; Viale E; Bartel MJ; Notaristefano C; Testoni PA
Surg Endosc; 2018 May; 32(5):2328-2339. PubMed ID: 29098434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: Systematic review of mid-term clinical outcomes.
Patel N; Patel K; Ashrafian H; Athanasiou T; Darzi A; Teare J
Dig Endosc; 2016 May; 28(4):405-416. PubMed ID: 26710317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection in Europe: Results of 1000 Neoplastic Lesions From the German Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection Registry.
Fleischmann C; Probst A; Ebigbo A; Faiss S; Schumacher B; Allgaier HP; Dumoulin FL; Steinbrueck I; Anzinger M; Marienhagen J; Muzalyova A; Messmann H
Gastroenterology; 2021 Oct; 161(4):1168-1178. PubMed ID: 34182002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pocket-creation method improves efficacy of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection: a system review and meta-analysis.
Gong J; Chen T; Tan Y; Liu D
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Oct; 33(10):1241-1246. PubMed ID: 32732811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial esophageal carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han C; Sun Y
Dis Esophagus; 2021 Apr; 34(4):. PubMed ID: 32895709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for 20-30 mm colorectal polyps.
Inoue T; Nakagawa K; Yamasaki Y; Shichijo S; Kanesaka T; Maekawa A; Higashino K; Uedo N; Ishihara R; Takeuchi Y
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Sep; 36(9):2549-2557. PubMed ID: 33724540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors Predictive of Complete Excision of Large Colorectal Neoplasia Using Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A KASID Multicenter Study.
Jung Y; Kim JW; Byeon JS; Koo HS; Boo SJ; Lee J; Hwangbo Y; Jeen YM; Kim HG
Dig Dis Sci; 2018 Oct; 63(10):2773-2779. PubMed ID: 29876776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large (20-30 mm) flat colorectal lesions.
Oh CK; Cho YW; Choi IH; Lee HH; Lim CH; Kim JS; Lee BI; Cho YS
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Mar; 37(3):568-575. PubMed ID: 34845766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal laterally spreading tumors: a meta-analysis.
Zhao HJ; Yin J; Ji CY; Wang X; Wang N
Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Dec; 112(12):941-947. PubMed ID: 33207885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection: An alternative resection modality for large laterally spreading tumors in the cecum?
Wang XY; Chai NL; Zhai YQ; Li LS; Wang ZT; Zou JL; Shi YS; Linghu EQ
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 May; 21(1):203. PubMed ID: 33952206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Planned Hybrid Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection as Alternative for Colorectal Neoplasms: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.
Zhang YX; Liu X; Gu F; Ding SG
Dig Dis Sci; 2024 Mar; 69(3):949-960. PubMed ID: 38218733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Effectiveness and Safety of Different Methods of Colorectal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.
Wu X; Ye C; Cao Z; Hu X; Pan W; Jing J
Dig Dis; 2022; 40(6):796-809. PubMed ID: 34937035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic mucosal resection
Shahini E; Passera R; Lo Secco G; Arezzo A
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2022 Aug; 31(6):835-847. PubMed ID: 35112654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial).
Esaki M; Ihara E; Fujii H; Sumida Y; Haraguchi K; Takahashi S; Iwasa T; Nakano K; Wada M; Somada S; Minoda Y; Ogino H; Tagawa K; Ogawa Y
Trials; 2022 Feb; 23(1):166. PubMed ID: 35189939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal polyps: outcome determining factors.
Chow CWS; Fung TLD; Chan PT; Kwok KH
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1293-1302. PubMed ID: 36192659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
