BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32947624)

  • 21. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Vaganov YE; Nagudov MA; Khomyakov EA; Achkasov SI
    Khirurgiia (Mosk); 2021; (9):77-84. PubMed ID: 34480459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical outcomes after endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Fuccio L; Hassan C; Ponchon T; Mandolesi D; Farioli A; Cucchetti A; Frazzoni L; Bhandari P; Bellisario C; Bazzoli F; Repici A
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Jul; 86(1):74-86.e17. PubMed ID: 28254526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Optimized hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal tumors: a randomized controlled trial.
    Bae JH; Yang DH; Lee S; Soh JS; Lee S; Lee HS; Lee HJ; Park SH; Kim KJ; Ye BD; Myung SJ; Yang SK; Byeon JS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Mar; 83(3):584-92. PubMed ID: 26320696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Efficacy of endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal neoplastic lesions: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Zhang T; Zhang H; Zhong F; Wang X
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 32856152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection reduces procedure time and risk of serious adverse events: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lopimpisuth C; Simons M; Akshintala VS; Prasongdee K; Nanavati J; Ngamruengphong S
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1775-1788. PubMed ID: 33825013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal neoplasms: an audit of its safety and efficacy in a single tertiary centre in Singapore.
    Li JW; Ang TL; Wang LM; Kwek ABE; Tan MTK; Fock KM; Teo EK
    Singapore Med J; 2019 Oct; 60(10):526-531. PubMed ID: 30773601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for high-grade dysplasia and early-stage carcinoma in the colorectum.
    Chen T; Qin WZ; Yao LQ; Zhong YS; Zhang YQ; Chen WF; Hu JW; Ooi M; Chen LL; Hou YY; Xu MD; Zhou PH
    Cancer Commun (Lond); 2018 Mar; 38(1):3. PubMed ID: 29764504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparing outcomes for endoscopic submucosal dissection between Eastern and Western countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Daoud DC; Suter N; Durand M; Bouin M; Faulques B; von Renteln D
    World J Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun; 24(23):2518-2536. PubMed ID: 29930473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Updated evaluation of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus surgery for early gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Liu Q; Ding L; Qiu X; Meng F
    Int J Surg; 2020 Jan; 73():28-41. PubMed ID: 31783166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pocket-creation method versus conventional method of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial colorectal neoplasms: a meta-analysis.
    Pei Q; Qiao H; Zhang M; Wang G; Feng H; Pan J; Shi Y
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2021 May; 93(5):1038-1046.e4. PubMed ID: 33484729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) versus endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for resection of large distal non-pedunculated colorectal adenomas (MATILDA-trial): rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial.
    Backes Y; Moons LM; van Bergeijk JD; Berk L; Ter Borg F; Ter Borg PC; Elias SG; Geesing JM; Groen JN; Hadithi M; Hardwick JC; Kerkhof M; Mangen MJ; Straathof JW; Schröder R; Schwartz MP; Spanier BW; de Vos Tot Nederveen Cappel WH; Wolfhagen FH; Koch AD
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2016 May; 16(1):56. PubMed ID: 27229709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Indications and outcomes of colorectal hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection: a large multicenter 10-year study.
    Okamoto Y; Oka S; Tanaka S; Nagata S; Kunihiro M; Kuwai T; Hiraga Y; Onogawa S; Mizumoto T; Okanobu H; Akagi M; Chayama K
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Mar; 36(3):1894-1902. PubMed ID: 33847798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Significance of rescue hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection in difficult colorectal cases.
    Yamaguchi H; Fukuzawa M; Kawai T; Muramatsu T; Matsumoto T; Uchida K; Koyama Y; Madarame A; Morise T; Kono S; Naito S; Nagata N; Sugimoto M; Itoi T
    Clin Endosc; 2023 Nov; 56(6):778-789. PubMed ID: 37491992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal tumors as determined by curative resection.
    Saito Y; Fukuzawa M; Matsuda T; Fukunaga S; Sakamoto T; Uraoka T; Nakajima T; Ikehara H; Fu KI; Itoi T; Fujii T
    Surg Endosc; 2010 Feb; 24(2):343-52. PubMed ID: 19517168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Short-term outcomes of traction-assisted versus conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial gastrointestinal neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
    Xia M; Zhou Y; Yu J; Chen W; Huang X; Liao J
    World J Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 17(1):94. PubMed ID: 31164139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Endoscopic submucosal dissection versus endoscopic mucosal resection for patients with early gastric cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Tao M; Zhou X; Hu M; Pan J
    BMJ Open; 2019 Dec; 9(12):e025803. PubMed ID: 31874864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Endoscopic submucosal dissection vs endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal tumors: a meta-analysis.
    Wang J; Zhang XH; Ge J; Yang CM; Liu JY; Zhao SL
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jul; 20(25):8282-7. PubMed ID: 25009404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Systematic review and meta-analysis of endoscopic submucosal dissection versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery for large noninvasive rectal lesions.
    Arezzo A; Passera R; Saito Y; Sakamoto T; Kobayashi N; Sakamoto N; Yoshida N; Naito Y; Fujishiro M; Niimi K; Ohya T; Ohata K; Okamura S; Iizuka S; Takeuchi Y; Uedo N; Fusaroli P; Bonino MA; Verra M; Morino M
    Surg Endosc; 2014 Feb; 28(2):427-38. PubMed ID: 24149849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal dysplasia in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Malik TF; Sabesan V; Mohan BP; Rahman AU; Othman MO; Draganov PV; Kochhar GS
    Clin Endosc; 2024 May; 57(3):317-328. PubMed ID: 38419168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparing endoscopic mucosal resection with endoscopic submucosal dissection in colorectal adenoma and tumors: Meta-analysis and system review.
    Wang N; Shu L; Liu S; Yang L; Bai T; Shi Z; Liu X
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(9):e0291916. PubMed ID: 37768914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.