124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32948093)
1. New Bioink Derived from Neonatal Chicken Bone Marrow Cells and Its 3D-Bioprinted Niche for Osteogenic Stimulators.
Yang WS; Kim WJ; Ahn JY; Lee J; Ko DW; Park S; Kim JY; Jang CH; Lim JM; Kim GH
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 Nov; 12(44):49386-49397. PubMed ID: 32948093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Collagen/bioceramic-based composite bioink to fabricate a porous 3D hASCs-laden structure for bone tissue regeneration.
Kim W; Kim G
Biofabrication; 2019 Nov; 12(1):015007. PubMed ID: 31509811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hybrid biofabrication of 3D osteoconductive constructs comprising Mg-based nanocomposites and cell-laden bioinks for bone repair.
Alcala-Orozco CR; Mutreja I; Cui X; Hooper GJ; Lim KS; Woodfield TBF
Bone; 2022 Jan; 154():116198. PubMed ID: 34534709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Osteogenic and angiogenic tissue formation in high fidelity nanocomposite Laponite-gelatin bioinks.
Cidonio G; Alcala-Orozco CR; Lim KS; Glinka M; Mutreja I; Kim YH; Dawson JI; Woodfield TBF; Oreffo ROC
Biofabrication; 2019 Jun; 11(3):035027. PubMed ID: 30991370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Human stem cell based corneal tissue mimicking structures using laser-assisted 3D bioprinting and functional bioinks.
Sorkio A; Koch L; Koivusalo L; Deiwick A; Miettinen S; Chichkov B; Skottman H
Biomaterials; 2018 Jul; 171():57-71. PubMed ID: 29684677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of culture conditions on the bone regeneration potential of osteoblast-laden 3D bioprinted constructs.
Raveendran N; Ivanovski S; Vaquette C
Acta Biomater; 2023 Jan; 156():190-201. PubMed ID: 36155098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Extracellular Matrix/Amorphous Magnesium Phosphate Bioink for 3D Bioprinting of Craniomaxillofacial Bone Tissue.
Dubey N; Ferreira JA; Malda J; Bhaduri SB; Bottino MC
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2020 May; 12(21):23752-23763. PubMed ID: 32352748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8.
Cunniffe GM; Gonzalez-Fernandez T; Daly A; Sathy BN; Jeon O; Alsberg E; Kelly DJ
Tissue Eng Part A; 2017 Sep; 23(17-18):891-900. PubMed ID: 28806146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 3D bioprinting of graphene oxide-incorporated cell-laden bone mimicking scaffolds for promoting scaffold fidelity, osteogenic differentiation and mineralization.
Zhang J; Eyisoylu H; Qin XH; Rubert M; Müller R
Acta Biomater; 2021 Feb; 121():637-652. PubMed ID: 33326888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Osteogenic Differentiation of Three-Dimensional Bioprinted Constructs Consisting of Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells In Vitro and In Vivo.
Wang XF; Song Y; Liu YS; Sun YC; Wang YG; Wang Y; Lyu PJ
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0157214. PubMed ID: 27332814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hydroxyapatite/Collagen Three-Dimensional Printed Scaffolds and Their Osteogenic Effects on Human Bone Marrow-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.
Li Q; Lei X; Wang X; Cai Z; Lyu P; Zhang G
Tissue Eng Part A; 2019 Sep; 25(17-18):1261-1271. PubMed ID: 30648467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hyaluronic acid based next generation bioink for 3D bioprinting of human stem cell derived corneal stromal model with innervation.
Mörö A; Samanta S; Honkamäki L; Rangasami VK; Puistola P; Kauppila M; Narkilahti S; Miettinen S; Oommen O; Skottman H
Biofabrication; 2022 Dec; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 36579828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Heterotopic osteogenesis of autogenous marrow stromal cells on ceramic bovine bone/ hydrogel scaffold].
He D; Jin Y; Luo K; Li S
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Feb; 20(2):116-20. PubMed ID: 16529318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. 3D bioprinted multiscale composite scaffolds based on gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA)/chitosan microspheres as a modular bioink for enhancing 3D neurite outgrowth and elongation.
Chen J; Huang D; Wang L; Hou J; Zhang H; Li Y; Zhong S; Wang Y; Wu Y; Huang W
J Colloid Interface Sci; 2020 Aug; 574():162-173. PubMed ID: 32311538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Strategy to Achieve Highly Porous/Biocompatible Macroscale Cell Blocks, Using a Collagen/Genipin-bioink and an Optimal 3D Printing Process.
Kim YB; Lee H; Kim GH
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2016 Nov; 8(47):32230-32240. PubMed ID: 27933843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Endothelial cells support osteogenesis in an in vitro vascularized bone model developed by 3D bioprinting.
Chiesa I; De Maria C; Lapomarda A; Fortunato GM; Montemurro F; Di Gesù R; Tuan RS; Vozzi G; Gottardi R
Biofabrication; 2020 Feb; 12(2):025013. PubMed ID: 31929117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bioprinting Organotypic Hydrogels with Improved Mesenchymal Stem Cell Remodeling and Mineralization Properties for Bone Tissue Engineering.
Duarte Campos DF; Blaeser A; Buellesbach K; Sen KS; Xun W; Tillmann W; Fischer H
Adv Healthc Mater; 2016 Jun; 5(11):1336-45. PubMed ID: 27072652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effects of intermittent dynamic loading on chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of human marrow stromal cells encapsulated in RGD-modified poly(ethylene glycol) hydrogels.
Steinmetz NJ; Bryant SJ
Acta Biomater; 2011 Nov; 7(11):3829-40. PubMed ID: 21742067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. 3D Bioprinted Osteogenic Tissue Models for In Vitro Drug Screening.
Breathwaite E; Weaver J; Odanga J; Dela Pena-Ponce M; Lee JB
Molecules; 2020 Jul; 25(15):. PubMed ID: 32751124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D bioprinting of BMSC-laden methacrylamide gelatin scaffolds with CBD-BMP2-collagen microfibers.
Du M; Chen B; Meng Q; Liu S; Zheng X; Zhang C; Wang H; Li H; Wang N; Dai J
Biofabrication; 2015 Dec; 7(4):044104. PubMed ID: 26684899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
