These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32948433)

  • 1. Practice patterns related to prostate cancer grading: results of a 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society clinician survey.
    Fine SW; Trpkov K; Amin MB; Algaba F; Aron M; Baydar DE; Beltran AL; Brimo F; Cheville JC; Colecchia M; Comperat E; Costello T; da Cunha IW; Delprado W; DeMarzo AM; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Guo CC; Hansel DE; Hirsch MS; Huang J; Humphrey PA; Jimenez RE; Khani F; Kong MX; Kryvenko ON; Kunju LP; Lal P; Latour M; Lotan T; Maclean F; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mehra R; Menon S; Miyamoto H; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Nguyen JK; Osunkoya AO; Parwani A; Pavlovich CP; Robinson BD; Rubin MA; Shah RB; So JS; Takahashi H; Tavora F; Tretiakova MS; True L; Wobker SE; Yang XJ; Zhou M; Zynger DL; Epstein JI
    Urol Oncol; 2021 May; 39(5):295.e1-295.e8. PubMed ID: 32948433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Fine SW; Algaba F; Aron M; Baydar DE; Beltran AL; Brimo F; Cheville JC; Colecchia M; Comperat E; da Cunha IW; Delprado W; DeMarzo AM; Giannico GA; Gordetsky JB; Guo CC; Hansel DE; Hirsch MS; Huang J; Humphrey PA; Jimenez RE; Khani F; Kong Q; Kryvenko ON; Kunju LP; Lal P; Latour M; Lotan T; Maclean F; Magi-Galluzzi C; Mehra R; Menon S; Miyamoto H; Montironi R; Netto GJ; Nguyen JK; Osunkoya AO; Parwani A; Robinson BD; Rubin MA; Shah RB; So JS; Takahashi H; Tavora F; Tretiakova MS; True L; Wobker SE; Yang XJ; Zhou M; Zynger DL; Trpkov K
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2021 Apr; 145(4):461-493. PubMed ID: 32589068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    Epstein JI; Amin MB; Reuter VE; Humphrey PA
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2017 Apr; 41(4):e1-e7. PubMed ID: 28177964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Detection of Prostate Cancer Harboring Adverse Pathological Features of Intraductal Carcinoma and Invasive Cribriform Carcinoma.
    Prendeville S; Gertner M; Maganti M; Pintilie M; Perlis N; Toi A; Evans AJ; Finelli A; van der Kwast TH; Ghai S
    J Urol; 2018 Jul; 200(1):104-113. PubMed ID: 29408568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.
    Epstein JI; Egevad L; Amin MB; Delahunt B; Srigley JR; Humphrey PA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):244-52. PubMed ID: 26492179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Reports of prostate needle biopsies-what pathologists provide and urologists want].
    Offermann A; Hupe MC; Joerg V; Sailer V; Kramer MW; Merseburger AS; Tharun L; Perner S
    Urologe A; 2020 Apr; 59(4):461-468. PubMed ID: 32016505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.
    Keefe DT; Schieda N; El Hallani S; Breau RH; Morash C; Robertson SJ; Mai KT; Belanger EC; Flood TA
    Virchows Arch; 2015 Oct; 467(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 26229020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. SOCS3 Immunohistochemical Expression Seems to Support the 2005 and 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Modified Gleason Grading System.
    Pierconti F; Martini M; Cenci T; Petrone GL; Ricci R; Sacco E; Bassi PF; Larocca LM
    Prostate; 2017 May; 77(6):597-603. PubMed ID: 28144985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An update of the Gleason grading system.
    Epstein JI
    J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):433-40. PubMed ID: 20006878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reporting Practices and Resource Utilization in the Era of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate: A Survey of Genitourinary Subspecialists.
    Gandhi JS; Smith SC; Paner GP; McKenney JK; Sekhri R; Osunkoya AO; Baras AS; DeMarzo AM; Cheville JC; Jimenez RE; Trpkov K; Colecchia M; Ro JY; Montironi R; Menon S; Hes O; Williamson SR; Hirsch MS; Netto GJ; Fine SW; Sirohi D; Kaushal S; Sangoi A; Robinson BD; Kweldam CF; Humphrey PA; Hansel DE; Schultz L; Magi-Galluzzi C; Przybycin CG; Shah RB; Mehra R; Kunju LP; Aron M; Kryvenko ON; Kench JG; Kuroda N; Tavora F; van der Kwast T; Grignon DJ; Epstein JI; Reuter VE; Amin MB
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 May; 44(5):673-680. PubMed ID: 31876580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current practice of Gleason grading among genitourinary pathologists.
    Egevad L; Allsbrook WC; Epstein JI
    Hum Pathol; 2005 Jan; 36(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 15712175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controversial issues in Gleason and International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) prostate cancer grading: proposed recommendations for international implementation.
    Srigley JR; Delahunt B; Samaratunga H; Billis A; Cheng L; Clouston D; Evans A; Furusato B; Kench J; Leite K; MacLennan G; Moch H; Pan CC; Rioux-Leclercq N; Ro J; Shanks J; Shen S; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Wheeler T; Yaxley J; Egevad L
    Pathology; 2019 Aug; 51(5):463-473. PubMed ID: 31279442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recent advances in prostate cancer pathology: Gleason grading and beyond.
    Shah RB; Zhou M
    Pathol Int; 2016 May; 66(5):260-72. PubMed ID: 26991008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Current beliefs and practice patterns among urologists regarding prostate magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance-targeted biopsy.
    Muthigi A; Sidana A; George AK; Kongnyuy M; Maruf M; Valayil S; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
    Urol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 35(1):32.e1-32.e7. PubMed ID: 27743850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Diagnostic Accuracy of Prostate Biopsy for Detecting Cribriform Gleason Pattern 4 Carcinoma and Intraductal Carcinoma in Paired Radical Prostatectomy Specimens: Implications for Active Surveillance.
    Ericson KJ; Wu SS; Lundy SD; Thomas LJ; Klein EA; McKenney JK
    J Urol; 2020 Feb; 203(2):311-319. PubMed ID: 31483693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prostate needle biopsy reporting: how are the surgical members of the Society of Urologic Oncology using pathology reports to guide treatment of prostate cancer patients?
    Rubin MA; Bismar TA; Curtis S; Montie JE
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2004 Jul; 28(7):946-52. PubMed ID: 15223967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grading of invasive cribriform carcinoma on prostate needle biopsy: an interobserver study among experts in genitourinary pathology.
    Latour M; Amin MB; Billis A; Egevad L; Grignon DJ; Humphrey PA; Reuter VE; Sakr WA; Srigley JR; Wheeler TM; Yang XJ; Epstein JI
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2008 Oct; 32(10):1532-9. PubMed ID: 18724248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative influence of cribriform growth and percent Gleason 4 in prostatic biopsies with Gleason 3+4 cancer.
    Czaja RC; Tarima S; Wu R; Palagnmonthip W; Iczkowski KA
    Ann Diagn Pathol; 2021 Jun; 52():151725. PubMed ID: 33610958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.
    van Leenders GJLH; van der Kwast TH; Grignon DJ; Evans AJ; Kristiansen G; Kweldam CF; Litjens G; McKenney JK; Melamed J; Mottet N; Paner GP; Samaratunga H; Schoots IG; Simko JP; Tsuzuki T; Varma M; Warren AY; Wheeler TM; Williamson SR; Iczkowski KA;
    Am J Surg Pathol; 2020 Aug; 44(8):e87-e99. PubMed ID: 32459716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of interobserver reproducibility of Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma in Japan and the United States.
    Oyama T; Allsbrook WC; Kurokawa K; Matsuda H; Segawa A; Sano T; Suzuki K; Epstein JI
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2005 Aug; 129(8):1004-10. PubMed ID: 16048389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.