529 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32950254)
1. Accuracy of complete-arch intraoral scans based on confocal microscopy versus optical triangulation: A comparative in vitro study.
Waldecker M; Rues S; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32950254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vitro evaluation of the accuracy and precision of intraoral and extraoral complete-arch scans.
Baghani MT; Shayegh SS; Johnston WM; Shidfar S; Hakimaneh SMR
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Nov; 126(5):665-670. PubMed ID: 33070974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of operator experience, scanner type, and scan size on 3D scans.
Resende CCD; Barbosa TAQ; Moura GF; Tavares LDN; Rizzante FAP; George FM; Neves FDD; Mendonça G
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb; 125(2):294-299. PubMed ID: 32115221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of six intraoral scanners for scanning complete-arch and 4-unit fixed partial dentures: An in vitro study.
Diker B; Tak Ö
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):187-194. PubMed ID: 33558056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Do "cut out-rescan" procedures have an impact on the accuracy of intraoral digital scans?
Reich S; Yatmaz B; Raith S
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):89-94. PubMed ID: 32059858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Scan time and accuracy of full-arch scans with intraoral scanners: a comparative study on conditions of the intraoral head-simulator and the hand-held model].
Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Han YT; Su YC; Wang X
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 56(6):570-575. PubMed ID: 34098673
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of three digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation: An in vitro comparison.
Gao H; Liu X; Liu M; Yang X; Tan J
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1001-1008. PubMed ID: 33736864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations.
Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Accuracy of three intraoral scans for primary impressions of edentulous jaws].
Cao Y; Chen JK; Deng KH; Wang Y; Sun YC; Zhao YJ
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Feb; 52(1):129-137. PubMed ID: 32071476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Positional trueness of abutments by using a digital die-merging protocol compared with complete arch direct digital scans and conventional dental impressions.
Jelicich A; Scialabba R; Lee SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):293-300. PubMed ID: 35430047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners.
Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In-vitro accuracy of complete arch scans of the fully dentate and the partially edentulous maxilla.
Waldecker M; Bömicke W; Behnisch R; Rammelsberg P; Rues S
J Prosthodont Res; 2022 Oct; 66(4):538-545. PubMed ID: 34880160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Accuracy of 4 digital scanning systems on prepared teeth digitally isolated from a complete dental arch.
Medina-Sotomayor P; Pascual-Moscardo A; Camps A I
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):811-820. PubMed ID: 30598308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners for scanning edentulous and dentate complete-arch mandibular casts: A comparative in vitro study.
Braian M; Wennerberg A
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Aug; 122(2):129-136.e2. PubMed ID: 30885584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of four recent intraoral scanners with respect to two different ceramic surfaces.
Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S
J Dent; 2023 Mar; 130():104414. PubMed ID: 36640842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: An in vitro study.
Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Jun; 25(3):502-510. PubMed ID: 36762495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of different complete coverage onlay preparation designs and the intraoral scanner on the accuracy of digital scans.
de Andrade GS; Luz JN; Tribst JPM; Chun EP; Bressane A; Borges ALS; Saavedra GSFA
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1168-1177. PubMed ID: 35717209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of complete- and partial-arch impressions of actual intraoral scanning systems in vitro.
Ender A; Zimmermann M; Mehl A
Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 30848250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of complete-arch dental impressions: a new method of measuring trueness and precision.
Ender A; Mehl A
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Feb; 109(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 23395338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study.
Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
