These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

538 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32950254)

  • 21. Accuracy of complete-arch model using an intraoral video scanner: An in vitro study.
    Jeong ID; Lee JJ; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Jun; 115(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 26794703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study.
    Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M
    J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effect of scan pattern on complete-arch scans with 4 digital scanners.
    Latham J; Ludlow M; Mennito A; Kelly A; Evans Z; Renne W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 30982616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the accuracy of 7 digital scanners: An in vitro analysis based on 3-dimensional comparisons.
    Renne W; Ludlow M; Fryml J; Schurch Z; Mennito A; Kessler R; Lauer A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 28024822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Accuracy evaluation of intraoral optical impressions: A clinical study using a reference appliance.
    Atieh MA; Ritter AV; Ko CC; Duqum I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):400-405. PubMed ID: 28222869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Local accuracy of actual intraoral scanning systems for single-tooth preparations in vitro.
    Zimmermann M; Ender A; Mehl A
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2020 Feb; 151(2):127-135. PubMed ID: 31883705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Influence of trueness for local finish lines of a full crown preparation on that of complete finish line].
    Jiang N; Bao XD; Yue L
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Sep; 53(1):102-108. PubMed ID: 33550343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: An in vitro study.
    Donmez MB; Mathey A; Gäumann F; Mathey A; Yilmaz B; Abou-Ayash S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1198-1207. PubMed ID: 36868987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Conventional Versus Digital Complete Arch Implant Impressions.
    Albayrak B; Sukotjo C; Wee AG; Korkmaz İH; Bayındır F
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Feb; 30(2):163-170. PubMed ID: 32935894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Effect of digital intraoral full-arch scan strategies on scan time and accuracy on conditions of intraoral head-simulator].
    Wu MT; Tang SX; Peng LY; Chen DP; Su YC; Wang X
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2021 Nov; 56(11):1092-1097. PubMed ID: 34763404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Feasibility of using an intraoral scanner for a complete-arch digital scan.
    Park GH; Son K; Lee KB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):803-810. PubMed ID: 30598314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A comparative study assessing the precision and trueness of digital and printed casts produced from several intraoral and extraoral scanners in full arch and short span (3-unit FPD) scanning: An in vitro study.
    Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jun; 32(5):423-430. PubMed ID: 35852379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Understanding the effect of scan spans on the accuracy of intraoral and desktop scanners.
    Chen Y; Zhai Z; Watanabe S; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
    J Dent; 2022 Sep; 124():104220. PubMed ID: 35817227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does ambient light affect the accuracy and scanning time of intraoral scans?
    Wesemann C; Kienbaum H; Thun M; Spies BC; Beuer F; Bumann A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):924-931. PubMed ID: 32487348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sources of error in maximum intercuspation from complete dentate full-arch intraoral scans in vitro.
    Osnes C; Wu J; Ferrari M; Joda T; Keeling A
    Int J Comput Dent; 2021 Sep; 24(3):283-291. PubMed ID: 34553893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Accuracy of intraoral scans: An in vivo study of different scanning devices.
    Kernen F; Schlager S; Seidel Alvarez V; Mehrhof J; Vach K; Kohal R; Nelson K; Flügge T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Dec; 128(6):1303-1309. PubMed ID: 33902891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy analysis of complete-arch digital scans in edentulous arches when using an auxiliary geometric device.
    Iturrate M; Eguiraun H; Etxaniz O; Solaberrieta E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Mar; 121(3):447-454. PubMed ID: 30554826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of single-abutment digital cast obtained using intraoral and cast scanners.
    Lee JJ; Jeong ID; Park JY; Jeon JH; Kim JH; Kim WC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Feb; 117(2):253-259. PubMed ID: 27666500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accuracy of digital complete-arch, multi-implant scans made in the edentulous jaw with gingival movement simulation: An in vitro study.
    Knechtle N; Wiedemeier D; Mehl A; Ender A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):468-478. PubMed ID: 33612335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of scan-path length on the scanning accuracy of completely dentate and partially edentulous maxillae.
    Waldecker M; Rues S; Behnisch R; Rammelsberg P; Bömicke W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jan; 131(1):146-154. PubMed ID: 35367080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 27.