1155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32951051)
1. The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study.
Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Alviggi E; Sansone A; Trabucco E; Dusi L; Buffo L; Barnocchi N; Fiorini F; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Argento C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32951051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.
Cimadomo D; Vaiarelli A; Colamaria S; Trabucco E; Alviggi C; Venturella R; Alviggi E; Carmelo R; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 29912374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Leave the past behind: women's reproductive history shows no association with blastocysts' euploidy and limited association with live birth rates after euploid embryo transfers.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Soscia D; Giancani A; Scepi E; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2021 Mar; 36(4):929-940. PubMed ID: 33608730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Looking past the appearance: a comprehensive description of the clinical contribution of poor-quality blastocysts to increase live birth rates during cycles with aneuploidy testing.
Cimadomo D; Soscia D; Vaiarelli A; Maggiulli R; Capalbo A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 31247100
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Associations of blastocyst features, trophectoderm biopsy and other laboratory practice with post-warming behavior and implantation.
Cimadomo D; Capalbo A; Levi-Setti PE; Soscia D; Orlando G; Albani E; Parini V; Stoppa M; Dovere L; Tacconi L; Ievoli E; Maggiulli R; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2018 Nov; 33(11):1992-2001. PubMed ID: 30265329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of blastocyst euploidy rates following luteal versus follicular phase stimulation in a GnRH antagonist protocol: a prospective study with repeated ovarian stimulation cycles.
Martinez F; Clua E; Roca M; Garcia S; Polyzos NP
Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2777-2786. PubMed ID: 36269092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How slow is too slow? A comprehensive portrait of Day 7 blastocysts and their clinical value standardized through artificial intelligence.
Cimadomo D; Soscia D; Casciani V; Innocenti F; Trio S; Chiappetta V; Albricci L; Maggiulli R; Erlich I; Ben-Meir A; Har-Vardi I; Vaiarelli A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2022 May; 37(6):1134-1147. PubMed ID: 35459944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Definition of a clinical strategy to enhance the efficacy, efficiency and safety of egg donation cycles with imported vitrified oocytes.
Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Vaiarelli A; Dusi L; Buffo L; Amendola MG; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Bruno G; Stoppa M; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 35(4):785-795. PubMed ID: 32240287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Worth the wait? Day 7 blastocysts have lower euploidy rates but similar sustained implantation rates as Day 5 and Day 6 blastocysts.
Tiegs AW; Sun L; Patounakis G; Scott RT
Hum Reprod; 2019 Sep; 34(9):1632-1639. PubMed ID: 31402381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of letrozole co-treatment during ovarian stimulation on oocyte yield, embryo development, and live birth rate in women with normal ovarian reserve: secondary outcomes from the RIOT trial.
Bülow NS; Warzecha AK; Nielsen MV; Andersen CY; Holt MD; Petersen MR; Sopa N; Zedeler A; Englund AL; Pinborg A; Grøndahl ML; Skouby SO; Macklon NS
Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 38(11):2154-2165. PubMed ID: 37699851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The BISTIM study: a randomized controlled trial comparing dual ovarian stimulation (duostim) with two conventional ovarian stimulations in poor ovarian responders undergoing IVF.
Massin N; Abdennebi I; Porcu-Buisson G; Chevalier N; Descat E; Piétin-Vialle C; Goro S; Brussieux M; Pinto M; Pasquier M; Bry-Gauillard H
Hum Reprod; 2023 May; 38(5):927-937. PubMed ID: 36864699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts.
Capalbo A; Rienzi L; Cimadomo D; Maggiulli R; Elliott T; Wright G; Nagy ZP; Ubaldi FM
Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1173-81. PubMed ID: 24578475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Inconclusive chromosomal assessment after blastocyst biopsy: prevalence, causative factors and outcomes after re-biopsy and re-vitrification. A multicenter experience.
Cimadomo D; Rienzi L; Romanelli V; Alviggi E; Levi-Setti PE; Albani E; Dusi L; Papini L; Livi C; Benini F; Smeraldi A; Patassini C; Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A
Hum Reprod; 2018 Oct; 33(10):1839-1846. PubMed ID: 30239718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is there an optimal window of time for transferring single frozen-thawed euploid blastocysts? A cohort study of 1170 embryo transfers.
An BGL; Chapman M; Tilia L; Venetis C
Hum Reprod; 2022 Nov; 37(12):2797-2807. PubMed ID: 36305795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does recurrent implantation failure exist? Prevalence and outcomes of five consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers in 123 987 patients.
Gill P; Ata B; Arnanz A; Cimadomo D; Vaiarelli A; Fatemi HM; Ubaldi FM; Garcia-Velasco JA; Seli E
Hum Reprod; 2024 May; 39(5):974-980. PubMed ID: 38452358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical outcomes following cryopreservation of blastocysts by vitrification or slow freezing: a population-based cohort study.
Li Z; Wang YA; Ledger W; Edgar DH; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2014 Dec; 29(12):2794-801. PubMed ID: 25316444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage, and culturing strategy for delayed development.
Wirleitner B; Schuff M; Stecher A; Murtinger M; Vanderzwalmen P
Hum Reprod; 2016 Aug; 31(8):1685-95. PubMed ID: 27270972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Human blastocyst spontaneous collapse is associated with worse morphological quality and higher degeneration and aneuploidy rates: a comprehensive analysis standardized through artificial intelligence.
Cimadomo D; Marconetto A; Trio S; Chiappetta V; Innocenti F; Albricci L; Erlich I; Ben-Meir A; Har-Vardi I; Kantor B; Sakov A; Coticchio G; Borini A; Ubaldi FM; Rienzi L
Hum Reprod; 2022 Sep; 37(10):2291-2306. PubMed ID: 35939563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Live birth rate following frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer is higher with blastocysts expanded on Day 5 than on Day 6.
Ferreux L; Bourdon M; Sallem A; Santulli P; Barraud-Lange V; Le Foll N; Maignien C; Chapron C; de Ziegler D; Wolf JP; Pocate-Cheriet K
Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 33(3):390-398. PubMed ID: 29394365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Opening the black box: why do euploid blastocysts fail to implant? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Cimadomo D; Rienzi L; Conforti A; Forman E; Canosa S; Innocenti F; Poli M; Hynes J; Gemmell L; Vaiarelli A; Alviggi C; Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A
Hum Reprod Update; 2023 Sep; 29(5):570-633. PubMed ID: 37192834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
