These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Bias in Radiology: The How and Why of Misses and Misinterpretations. Busby LP; Courtier JL; Glastonbury CM Radiographics; 2018; 38(1):236-247. PubMed ID: 29194009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cognitive errors in diagnosis: instantiation, classification, and consequences. Kassirer JP; Kopelman RI Am J Med; 1989 Apr; 86(4):433-41. PubMed ID: 2648823 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Heuristics and Cognitive Error in Medical Imaging. Itri JN; Patel SH AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 May; 210(5):1097-1105. PubMed ID: 29528716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expert Intraoperative Judgment and Decision-Making: Defining the Cognitive Competencies for Safe Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. Madani A; Watanabe Y; Feldman LS; Vassiliou MC; Barkun JS; Fried GM; Aggarwal R J Am Coll Surg; 2015 Nov; 221(5):931-940.e8. PubMed ID: 26292647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical problem-solving: a critique of the literature. McGuire CH J Med Educ; 1985 Aug; 60(8):587-95. PubMed ID: 4020839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective. Elstein AS Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2009 Sep; 14 Suppl 1():7-18. PubMed ID: 19669916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Is there something special with probabilities?--insight vs. computational ability in multiple risk combination. Juslin P; Lindskog M; Mayerhofer B Cognition; 2015 Mar; 136():282-303. PubMed ID: 25514208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Violations of coherence in subjective probability: a representational and assessment processes account. Mandel DR Cognition; 2008 Jan; 106(1):130-56. PubMed ID: 17300773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Diagnostic decision-making and strategies to improve diagnosis. Thammasitboon S; Cutrer WB Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care; 2013 Oct; 43(9):232-41. PubMed ID: 24070580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature. Elstein AS; Schwartz A BMJ; 2002 Mar; 324(7339):729-32. PubMed ID: 11909793 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Stanovich KE; West RF Behav Brain Sci; 2000 Oct; 23(5):645-65; discussion 665-726. PubMed ID: 11301544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dual-processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Evans JS Annu Rev Psychol; 2008; 59():255-78. PubMed ID: 18154502 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Probability theory, not the very guide of life. Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):856-74. PubMed ID: 19839686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Stanovich KE; West RF J Pers Soc Psychol; 2008 Apr; 94(4):672-95. PubMed ID: 18361678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neglect of alternative causes in predictive but not diagnostic reasoning. Fernbach PM; Darlow A; Sloman SA Psychol Sci; 2010 Mar; 21(3):329-36. PubMed ID: 20424064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Singular clues to causality and their use in human causal judgment. White PA Cogn Sci; 2014; 38(1):38-75. PubMed ID: 23957568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Description of clinical thinking by the dual-process theory]. Peña G L Rev Med Chil; 2012 Jun; 140(6):806-10. PubMed ID: 23282621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reducing cognitive biases in probabilistic reasoning by the use of logarithm formats. Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A; Lindskog M Cognition; 2011 Aug; 120(2):248-67. PubMed ID: 21640337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]