145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32951527)
1. Benefits and Limitations of the Minimally Invasive Postmortem: A Review of an Innovative Service Development.
Hyde G; Rummery R; Whitby EH; Bloor J; Raghavan A; Cohen MC
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2020; 23(6):431-437. PubMed ID: 32951527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial experiences of a minimally invasive autopsy service. A report of the techniques and observations in the first 11 cases.
Whitby EH; Offiah AC; Cohen MC
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2015; 18(1):24-9. PubMed ID: 25386838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternatives to Autopsy for Fetal and Early Neonatal (Perinatal) Deaths: Insights from the Wisconsin Stillbirth Service Program.
McPherson E; Nestoridi E; Heinke D; Roberts DJ; Fretts R; Yazdy MM; Lin AE
Birth Defects Res; 2017 Nov; 109(18):1430-1441. PubMed ID: 28898573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimally invasive autopsy for fetuses and children based on a combination of post-mortem MRI and endoscopic examination: a feasibility study.
Lewis C; Hutchinson JC; Riddington M; Hill M; Arthurs OJ; Fisher J; Wade A; Doré CJ; Chitty LS; Sebire NJ
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Aug; 23(46):1-104. PubMed ID: 31461397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem.
Cohen MC; Paley MN; Griffiths PD; Whitby EH
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2008; 11(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 18237232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination ("keyhole autopsy"): feasibility and initial experience.
Sebire NJ; Weber MA; Thayyil S; Mushtaq I; Taylor A; Chitty LS
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2012 May; 25(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 21740313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Conventional vs virtual autopsy with postmortem MRI in phenotypic characterization of stillbirths and fetal malformations.
Shruthi M; Gupta N; Jana M; Mridha AR; Kumar A; Agarwal R; Sharma R; Deka D; Gupta AK; Kabra M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb; 51(2):236-245. PubMed ID: 28295775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fetal postmortem imaging: an overview of current techniques and future perspectives.
Kang X; Carlin A; Cannie MM; Sanchez TC; Jani JC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Oct; 223(4):493-515. PubMed ID: 32376319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive perinatal and pediatric autopsy with laparoscopically assisted tissue sampling: feasibility and experience of the MinImAL procedure.
Hutchinson JC; Shelmerdine SC; Lewis C; Parmenter J; Simcock IC; Ward L; Ashworth MT; Chitty LS; Arthurs OJ; Sebire NJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Nov; 54(5):661-669. PubMed ID: 30620444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differences in Postmortem Investigation following Perinatal Death.
Nestander MA; Berryman K; Brady R; Aden J; Haischer-Rollo G
Am J Perinatol; 2023 May; 40(7):780-787. PubMed ID: 34126647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Perinatal death investigations: What is current practice?
Nijkamp JW; Sebire NJ; Bouman K; Korteweg FJ; Erwich JJHM; Gordijn SJ
Semin Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Jun; 22(3):167-175. PubMed ID: 28325580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic accuracy of postmortem ultrasound vs postmortem 1.5-T MRI for non-invasive perinatal autopsy.
Shelmerdine SC; Sebire NJ; Arthurs OJ
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar; 57(3):449-458. PubMed ID: 32149428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Caudal regression syndrome type 1 with minimally invasive computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging autopsy: a case report.
Ayoub M; Dixon C; Byrd SE; Bowker RM
J Med Case Rep; 2023 Nov; 17(1):491. PubMed ID: 38001547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Results of full postmortem examination in a cohort of clinically unexplained stillbirths: undetected fetal growth restriction and placental insufficiency are prevalent findings.
Blythe C; Vazquez REZ; Cabrera MS; Zekic Tomas S; Oc Anumba D; Cohen MC
J Perinatol; 2019 Sep; 39(9):1196-1203. PubMed ID: 31266993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Morphological findings and value of placental examination at fetal and perinatal autopsy.
Larsen LG; Graem N
APMIS; 1999 Mar; 107(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 10223307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Risk factors and classification of stillbirth in a Middle Eastern population: a retrospective study.
Kunjachen Maducolil M; Abid H; Lobo RM; Chughtai AQ; Afzal AM; Saleh HAH; Lindow SW
J Perinat Med; 2018 Nov; 46(9):1022-1027. PubMed ID: 29267175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Postmortem clinical examination by experienced clinical geneticists as an alternative to conventional autopsy for assessment of fetal and perinatal deaths in countries with limited resources.
Abdalla EM; El Desouky LM; Hassanein NM
Turk J Pediatr; 2015; 57(2):146-53. PubMed ID: 26690595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. How important is placental examination in cases of perinatal deaths?
Tellefsen CH; Vogt C
Pediatr Dev Pathol; 2011; 14(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 20718631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A retrospective autopsy study of 42 cases of stillbirth in Avicenna Research Institute.
Soltanghoraee H; Moradi-Lakeh M; Khalili N; Soltani A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2022 Jun; 22(1):507. PubMed ID: 35739463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Embryo and fetal pathology in routine diagnostics: what has changed and what needs to be changed].
Fulcheri E; Bulfamante G; Resta L; Taddei GL
Pathologica; 2006 Feb; 98(1):1-36. PubMed ID: 16789683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
