BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32951893)

  • 1. Mutation profiling of uterine cervical cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy.
    Yoshimoto Y; Sasaki Y; Murata K; Noda SE; Miyasaka Y; Hamamoto J; Furuya M; Hirato J; Suzuki Y; Ohno T; Tokino T; Oike T; Nakano T
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Nov; 159(2):546-553. PubMed ID: 32951893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of histological subtype on survival in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer that were treated with definitive radiotherapy: adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma versus squamous cell carcinoma.
    Yokoi E; Mabuchi S; Takahashi R; Matsumoto Y; Kuroda H; Kozasa K; Kimura T
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Mar; 28(2):e19. PubMed ID: 28028992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential clinical characteristics, treatment response and prognosis of locally advanced adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of cervix treated with definitive radiotherapy.
    Chen JL; Huang CY; Huang YS; Chen RJ; Wang CW; Chen YH; Cheng JC; Cheng AL; Kuo SH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jul; 93(7):661-8. PubMed ID: 24666257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Genetic alterations in the K-Ras gene influence the prognosis in patients with cervical cancer treated by radiotherapy.
    Wegman P; Ahlin C; Sorbe B
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2011 Jan; 21(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 21330833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Frequent loss of tumor suppressor ARID1A protein expression in adenocarcinomas/adenosquamous carcinomas of the uterine cervix.
    Katagiri A; Nakayama K; Rahman MT; Rahman M; Katagiri H; Ishikawa M; Ishibashi T; Iida K; Otsuki Y; Nakayama S; Miyazaki K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 22274316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. FGFR Signaling as a Candidate Therapeutic Target for Cancers Resistant to Carbon Ion Radiotherapy.
    Darwis NDM; Nachankar A; Sasaki Y; Matsui T; Noda SE; Murata K; Tamaki T; Ando K; Okonogi N; Shiba S; Irie D; Kaminuma T; Kumazawa T; Anakura M; Yamashita S; Hirakawa T; Kakoti S; Hirota Y; Tokino T; Iwase A; Ohno T; Shibata A; Oike T; Nakano T
    Int J Mol Sci; 2019 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 31540114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysis.
    Zhou J; Wu SG; Sun JY; Li FY; Lin HX; Chen QH; He ZY
    J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Jan; 143(1):115-122. PubMed ID: 27646608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precise Classification of Cervical Carcinomas Combined with Somatic Mutation Profiling Contributes to Predicting Disease Outcome.
    Spaans VM; Trietsch MD; Peters AA; Osse M; Ter Haar N; Fleuren GJ; Jordanova ES
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0133670. PubMed ID: 26197069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The differences in immune features and genomic profiling between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma - A multi-center study in Chinese patients with uterine cervical cancer.
    Li J; Xue X; Zhang Y; Ding F; Wu W; Liu C; Xu Y; Chen H; Ou Q; Shao Y; Li X; Wu F; Wu X
    Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Aug; 175():133-141. PubMed ID: 37356314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prognostic factors in definitive radiotherapy of uterine cervical cancer.
    Yalman D; Aras AB; Ozkök S; Duransoy A; Celik OK; Ozsaran Z; Haydaroğlu A
    Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(3-4):309-14. PubMed ID: 12807246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of clinical behaviors and responses to radiation between squamous cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas/adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix.
    Hong JH; Tsai CS; Wang CC; Lai CH; Chen WC; Lee SP; Chang TC; Tseng CJ
    Chang Gung Med J; 2000 Jul; 23(7):396-404. PubMed ID: 10974754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. EGFR gene amplification is related to adverse clinical outcomes in cervical squamous cell carcinoma, making the EGFR pathway a novel therapeutic target.
    Iida K; Nakayama K; Rahman MT; Rahman M; Ishikawa M; Katagiri A; Yeasmin S; Otsuki Y; Kobayashi H; Nakayama S; Miyazaki K
    Br J Cancer; 2011 Jul; 105(3):420-7. PubMed ID: 21730982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Therapeutic outcome and prognostic factors in the radiotherapy of recurrences of cervical carcinoma following surgery.
    Hille A; Weiss E; Hess CF
    Strahlenther Onkol; 2003 Nov; 179(11):742-7. PubMed ID: 14605743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improved survival of patients with cervical cancer treated with image-guided brachytherapy compared with conventional brachytherapy.
    Rijkmans EC; Nout RA; Rutten IH; Ketelaars M; Neelis KJ; Laman MS; Coen VL; Gaarenstroom KN; Kroep JR; Creutzberg CL
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Nov; 135(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 25172763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of clinical outcomes of adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma in uterine cervical cancer patients receiving surgical resection followed by radiotherapy: a multicenter retrospective study (KROG 13-10).
    Noh JM; Park W; Kim YS; Kim JY; Kim HJ; Kim J; Kim JH; Yoon MS; Choi JH; Yoon WS; Kim JY; Huh SJ
    Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Mar; 132(3):618-23. PubMed ID: 24486605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Significance of PD-L1 expression in carbon-ion radiotherapy for uterine cervical adeno/adenosquamous carcinoma.
    Iijima M; Okonogi N; Nakajima NI; Morokoshi Y; Kanda H; Yamada T; Kobayashi Y; Banno K; Wakatsuki M; Yamada S; Kamada T; Aoki D; Hasegawa S
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 31(2):e19. PubMed ID: 31912675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Expression of fibroblast growth factor receptor family members is associated with prognosis in early stage cervical cancer patients.
    Choi CH; Chung JY; Kim JH; Kim BG; Hewitt SM
    J Transl Med; 2016 May; 14(1):124. PubMed ID: 27154171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment outcomes of patients with adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy and the prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating CD8+ lymphocytes in pre-treatment biopsy specimens: a multi-institutional retrospective study.
    Miyasaka Y; Yoshimoto Y; Murata K; Noda SE; Ando K; Ebara T; Okonogi N; Kaminuma T; Yamada S; Ikota H; Yokoo H; Ohno T; Nakano T
    J Radiat Res; 2020 Mar; 61(2):275-284. PubMed ID: 32052042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of response to radiation therapy of patients with cervical adenocarcinoma compared with squamous cell carcinoma. MIB-1 and PC10 labeling indices.
    Oka K; Nakano T; Hoshi T
    Cancer; 1996 Jun; 77(11):2280-5. PubMed ID: 8635096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical outcomes following conventional external beam radiotherapy boost in Japanese patients with cervical cancer who are ineligible for intracavitary brachytherapy.
    Ito K; Shimizuguchi T; Karasawa K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2019 Mar; 49(3):270-275. PubMed ID: 30576504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.