203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32952483)
1. The LNT Issue Is About Politics and Economics, Not Safety.
Cuttler JM
Dose Response; 2020; 18(3):1559325820949066. PubMed ID: 32952483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Until There Is a Resolution of the Pro-LNT/Anti-LNT Debate, We Should Head Toward a More Sensible Graded Approach for Protection From Low-Dose Ionizing Radiation.
Sykes PJ
Dose Response; 2020; 18(2):1559325820921651. PubMed ID: 32425725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Commentary: ethical issues of current health-protection policies on low-dose ionizing radiation.
Socol Y; Dobrzyński L; Doss M; Feinendegen LE; Janiak MK; Miller ML; Sanders CL; Scott BR; Ulsh B; Vaiserman A
Dose Response; 2014 May; 12(2):342-8. PubMed ID: 24910586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 1: Radiation and leukemia: Where LNT began.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111025. PubMed ID: 33744270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Linear No-Threshold Model of Low-Dose Radiogenic Cancer: A Failed Fiction.
Pennington CW; Siegel JA
Dose Response; 2019; 17(1):1559325818824200. PubMed ID: 30792613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A message to Fukushima: nothing to fear but fear itself.
Sutou S
Genes Environ; 2016; 38():12. PubMed ID: 27350831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Are We Approaching the End of the Linear No-Threshold Era?
Doss M
J Nucl Med; 2018 Dec; 59(12):1786-1793. PubMed ID: 30262515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Tremendous Human, Social, and Economic Losses Caused by Obstinate Application of the Failed Linear No-threshold Model].
Sutou S
Yakugaku Zasshi; 2015; 135(11):1197-211. PubMed ID: 26521869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Low-dose radiation from A-bombs elongated lifespan and reduced cancer mortality relative to un-irradiated individuals.
Sutou S
Genes Environ; 2018; 40():26. PubMed ID: 30598710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. LNT and cancer risk assessment: Its flawed foundations part 2: How unsound LNT science became accepted.
Calabrese EJ
Environ Res; 2021 Jun; 197():111041. PubMed ID: 33794170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. It Is Time to Move Beyond the Linear No-Threshold Theory for Low-Dose Radiation Protection.
Cardarelli JJ; Ulsh BA
Dose Response; 2018; 16(3):1559325818779651. PubMed ID: 30013457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Black rain in Hiroshima: a critique to the Life Span Study of A-bomb survivors, basis of the linear no-threshold model.
Sutou S
Genes Environ; 2020; 42():1. PubMed ID: 31908690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ionizing radiation protection and the linear No-threshold controversy: Extent of support or counter to the prevailing paradigm.
Okonkwo UC; Ohagwu CC; Aronu ME; Okafor CE; Idumah CI; Okokpujie IP; Chukwu NN; Chukwunyelu CE
J Environ Radioact; 2022 Nov; 253-254():106984. PubMed ID: 36057228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The linear nonthreshold (LNT) model as used in radiation protection: an NCRP update.
Boice JD
Int J Radiat Biol; 2017 Oct; 93(10):1079-1092. PubMed ID: 28532210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Death of the ALARA Radiation Protection Principle as Used in the Medical Sector.
Oakley PA; Harrison DE
Dose Response; 2020; 18(2):1559325820921641. PubMed ID: 32425724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preserving the Anti-Scientific Linear No-Threshold Myth: Authority, Agnosticism, Transparency, and the Standard of Care.
Sacks B; Siegel JA
Dose Response; 2017; 15(3):1559325817717839. PubMed ID: 28814947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The linear No-Threshold (LNT) dose response model: A comprehensive assessment of its historical and scientific foundations.
Calabrese EJ
Chem Biol Interact; 2019 Mar; 301():6-25. PubMed ID: 30763547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Origin of the linearity no threshold (LNT) dose-response concept.
Calabrese EJ
Arch Toxicol; 2013 Sep; 87(9):1621-33. PubMed ID: 23887208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Atomic bomb health benefits.
Luckey TD
Dose Response; 2008; 6(4):369-82. PubMed ID: 19088902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How self-interest and deception led to the adoption of the linear non-threshold dose response (LNT) model for cancer risk assessment.
Selby PB; Calabrese EJ
Sci Total Environ; 2023 Nov; 898():165402. PubMed ID: 37454843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
