181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32952940)
21. Somatic and Germline Variant Calling from Next-Generation Sequencing Data.
Chang TC; Xu K; Cheng Z; Wu G
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2022; 1361():37-54. PubMed ID: 35230682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. ICR142 Benchmarker: evaluating, optimising and benchmarking variant calling performance using the ICR142 NGS validation series.
Ruark E; Holt E; Renwick A; Münz M; Wakeling M; Ellard S; Mahamdallie S; Yost S; Rahman N
Wellcome Open Res; 2018; 3():108. PubMed ID: 30483600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Integrated approach to generate artificial samples with low tumor fraction for somatic variant calling benchmarking.
Sergi A; Beltrame L; Marchini S; Masseroli M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2024 May; 25(1):180. PubMed ID: 38720249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of Read Mapping and Variant Calling Tools for the Analysis of Plant NGS Data.
Schilbert HM; Rempel A; Pucker B
Plants (Basel); 2020 Apr; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 32252268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Samovar: Single-Sample Mosaic Single-Nucleotide Variant Calling with Linked Reads.
Darby CA; Fitch JR; Brennan PJ; Kelly BJ; Bir N; Magrini V; Leonard J; Cottrell CE; Gastier-Foster JM; Wilson RK; Mardis ER; White P; Langmead B; Schatz MC
iScience; 2019 Aug; 18():1-10. PubMed ID: 31271967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A machine learning model to determine the accuracy of variant calls in capture-based next generation sequencing.
van den Akker J; Mishne G; Zimmer AD; Zhou AY
BMC Genomics; 2018 Apr; 19(1):263. PubMed ID: 29665779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A multilocus approach for accurate variant calling in low-copy repeats using whole-genome sequencing.
Prodanov T; Bansal V
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jun; 39(39 Suppl 1):i279-i287. PubMed ID: 37387146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. UNDR ROVER - a fast and accurate variant caller for targeted DNA sequencing.
Park DJ; Li R; Lau E; Georgeson P; Nguyen-Dumont T; Pope BJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Apr; 17():165. PubMed ID: 27083325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Onkopipe: A Snakemake Based DNA-Sequencing Pipeline for Clinical Variant Analysis in Precision Medicine.
Yang J; Beißbarth T; Dönitz J
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2023 Sep; 307():60-68. PubMed ID: 37697838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. tarSVM: Improving the accuracy of variant calls derived from microfluidic PCR-based targeted next generation sequencing using a support vector machine.
Gillies CE; Otto EA; Vega-Warner V; Robertson CC; Sanna-Cherchi S; Gharavi A; Crawford B; Bhimma R; Winkler C; ; ; Kang HM; Sampson MG
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 17(1):233. PubMed ID: 27287006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. SNooPer: a machine learning-based method for somatic variant identification from low-pass next-generation sequencing.
Spinella JF; Mehanna P; Vidal R; Saillour V; Cassart P; Richer C; Ouimet M; Healy J; Sinnett D
BMC Genomics; 2016 Nov; 17(1):912. PubMed ID: 27842494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A review of somatic single nucleotide variant calling algorithms for next-generation sequencing data.
Xu C
Comput Struct Biotechnol J; 2018; 16():15-24. PubMed ID: 29552334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. EMVC-2: an efficient single-nucleotide variant caller based on expectation maximization.
Dufort Y Álvarez G; Xargay-Ferrer M; Pagès-Zamora A; Ochoa I
Bioinformatics; 2024 Mar; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 37963064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Accuracy and reproducibility of somatic point mutation calling in clinical-type targeted sequencing data.
Karimnezhad A; Palidwor GA; Thavorn K; Stewart DJ; Campbell PA; Lo B; Perkins TJ
BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Oct; 13(1):156. PubMed ID: 33059707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Identification of single nucleotide variants using position-specific error estimation in deep sequencing data.
Kleftogiannis D; Punta M; Jayaram A; Sandhu S; Wong SQ; Gasi Tandefelt D; Conteduca V; Wetterskog D; Attard G; Lise S
BMC Med Genomics; 2019 Aug; 12(1):115. PubMed ID: 31375105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Performance evaluation of pipelines for mapping, variant calling and interval padding, for the analysis of NGS germline panels.
Zanti M; Michailidou K; Loizidou MA; Machattou C; Pirpa P; Christodoulou K; Spyrou GM; Kyriacou K; Hadjisavvas A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Apr; 22(1):218. PubMed ID: 33910496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. amplimap: a versatile tool to process and analyze targeted NGS data.
Koelling N; Bernkopf M; Calpena E; Maher GJ; Miller KA; Ralph HK; Goriely A; Wilkie AOM
Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 35(24):5349-5350. PubMed ID: 31350555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Accurate estimation of molecular counts from amplicon sequence data with unique molecular identifiers.
Peng X; Dorman KS
Bioinformatics; 2023 Jan; 39(1):. PubMed ID: 36610988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. SiNVICT: ultra-sensitive detection of single nucleotide variants and indels in circulating tumour DNA.
Kockan C; Hach F; Sarrafi I; Bell RH; McConeghy B; Beja K; Haegert A; Wyatt AW; Volik SV; Chi KN; Collins CC; Sahinalp SC
Bioinformatics; 2017 Jan; 33(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 27531099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Benchmarking Low-Frequency Variant Calling With Long-Read Data on Mitochondrial DNA.
Lüth T; Schaake S; Grünewald A; May P; Trinh J; Weissensteiner H
Front Genet; 2022; 13():887644. PubMed ID: 35664331
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
