BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32952940)

  • 41. Generation of artificial FASTQ files to evaluate the performance of next-generation sequencing pipelines.
    Frampton M; Houlston R
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e49110. PubMed ID: 23152858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Boquila: NGS read simulator to eliminate read nucleotide bias in sequence analysis.
    Akköse Ü; Adebali O
    Turk J Biol; 2023; 47(2):158-163. PubMed ID: 37529166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. ImmunoDataAnalyzer: a bioinformatics pipeline for processing barcoded and UMI tagged immunological NGS data.
    Vetter J; Schaller S; Heinzel A; Aschauer C; Reindl-Schwaighofer R; Jelencsics K; Hu K; Oberbauer R; Winkler SM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2022 Jan; 23(1):21. PubMed ID: 34991455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. AMLVaran: a software approach to implement variant analysis of targeted NGS sequencing data in an oncological care setting.
    Wünsch C; Banck H; Müller-Tidow C; Dugas M
    BMC Med Genomics; 2020 Feb; 13(1):17. PubMed ID: 32019565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Detecting clinically actionable variants in the 3' exons of PMS2 via a reflex workflow based on equivalent hybrid capture of the gene and its pseudogene.
    Gould GM; Grauman PV; Theilmann MR; Spurka L; Wang IE; Melroy LM; Chin RG; Hite DH; Chu CS; Maguire JR; Hogan GJ; Muzzey D
    BMC Med Genet; 2018 Sep; 19(1):176. PubMed ID: 30268105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evaluation of Nine Somatic Variant Callers for Detection of Somatic Mutations in Exome and Targeted Deep Sequencing Data.
    Krøigård AB; Thomassen M; Lænkholm AV; Kruse TA; Larsen MJ
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151664. PubMed ID: 27002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. High efficiency error suppression for accurate detection of low-frequency variants.
    Wang TT; Abelson S; Zou J; Li T; Zhao Z; Dick JE; Shlush LI; Pugh TJ; Bratman SV
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2019 Sep; 47(15):e87. PubMed ID: 31127310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Variant callers for next-generation sequencing data: a comparison study.
    Liu X; Han S; Wang Z; Gelernter J; Yang BZ
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75619. PubMed ID: 24086590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Pseudo-Sanger sequencing: massively parallel production of long and near error-free reads using NGS technology.
    Ruan J; Jiang L; Chong Z; Gong Q; Li H; Li C; Tao Y; Zheng C; Zhai W; Turissini D; Cannon CH; Lu X; Wu CI
    BMC Genomics; 2013 Oct; 14(1):711. PubMed ID: 24134808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Benchmarking and improving the performance of variant-calling pipelines with RecallME.
    Vozza G; Bonetti E; Tini G; Favalli V; Frigè G; Bucci G; De Summa S; Zanfardino M; Zapelloni F; Mazzarella L
    Bioinformatics; 2023 Dec; 39(12):. PubMed ID: 38092052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. On the design and analysis of next-generation sequencing genotyping for a cohort with haplotype-informative reads.
    Zhi D; Liu N; Zhang K
    Methods; 2015 Jun; 79-80():41-6. PubMed ID: 25644447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. PhredEM: a phred-score-informed genotype-calling approach for next-generation sequencing studies.
    Liao P; Satten GA; Hu YJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2017 Jul; 41(5):375-387. PubMed ID: 28560825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. SomatoSim: precision simulation of somatic single nucleotide variants.
    Hawari MA; Hong CS; Biesecker LG
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2021 Mar; 22(1):109. PubMed ID: 33676403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. MAGERI: Computational pipeline for molecular-barcoded targeted resequencing.
    Shugay M; Zaretsky AR; Shagin DA; Shagina IA; Volchenkov IA; Shelenkov AA; Lebedin MY; Bagaev DV; Lukyanov S; Chudakov DM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2017 May; 13(5):e1005480. PubMed ID: 28475621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Best practices for variant calling in clinical sequencing.
    Koboldt DC
    Genome Med; 2020 Oct; 12(1):91. PubMed ID: 33106175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. AmpUMI: design and analysis of unique molecular identifiers for deep amplicon sequencing.
    Clement K; Farouni R; Bauer DE; Pinello L
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):i202-i210. PubMed ID: 29949956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Ultraplex: A rapid, flexible, all-in-one fastq demultiplexer.
    Wilkins OG; Capitanchik C; Luscombe NM; Ule J
    Wellcome Open Res; 2021; 6():141. PubMed ID: 34286104
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Systematic benchmark of state-of-the-art variant calling pipelines identifies major factors affecting accuracy of coding sequence variant discovery.
    Barbitoff YA; Abasov R; Tvorogova VE; Glotov AS; Predeus AV
    BMC Genomics; 2022 Feb; 23(1):155. PubMed ID: 35193511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. An investigation of causes of false positive single nucleotide polymorphisms using simulated reads from a small eukaryote genome.
    Ribeiro A; Golicz A; Hackett CA; Milne I; Stephen G; Marshall D; Flavell AJ; Bayer M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Nov; 16():382. PubMed ID: 26558718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. SECNVs: A Simulator of Copy Number Variants and Whole-Exome Sequences From Reference Genomes.
    Xing Y; Dabney AR; Li X; Wang G; Gill CA; Casola C
    Front Genet; 2020; 11():82. PubMed ID: 32153642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.