147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32953738)
1. Impact of the number of examined lymph nodes on stage migration in node-negative gastric cancer patients: a Chinese multi-institutional analysis with propensity score matching.
Gu P; Deng J; Wang W; Wang Z; Zhou Z; Xu H; Liang H
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Aug; 8(15):938. PubMed ID: 32953738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of examined lymph node count on staging and long-term survival of patients with node-negative stage III gastric cancer: a retrospective study using a Chinese multi-institutional registry with Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data validation.
Zhang N; Bai H; Deng J; Wang W; Sun Z; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhou Z; Liang H
Ann Transl Med; 2020 Sep; 8(17):1075. PubMed ID: 33145294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of clinical significance of examined lymph node count for accurate prognostic evaluation of gastric cancer for the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging system.
Deng J; Liu J; Wang W; Sun Z; Wang Z; Zhou Z; Xu H; Liang H
Chin J Cancer Res; 2018 Oct; 30(5):477-491. PubMed ID: 30510359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Prognosis Value of Lymphatic Vessel Invasion in pN0 Gastric Cancer Patients with Insufficient Examined Lymph Nodes.
Huang JY; Xing YN; Wang X; Wang ZN; Hou WB; Yin SC; Xu YY; Zhu Z; Xu HM
J Gastrointest Surg; 2020 Feb; 24(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 30671803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel pN3 gastric cancer staging system with superior prognostic utility based upon the examination of over 31 lymph nodes: a propensity score-matching analysis.
Hu Q; Pan S; Guo Z
BMC Gastroenterol; 2021 Sep; 21(1):352. PubMed ID: 34563111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic significance of examined lymph node count in older patients with stage T1N0M0 pulmonary carcinoid tumours: a population-based propensity score-matched analysis.
Yang H; Fang Z; Liu T; Zhu X; Luo L
Aging Clin Exp Res; 2023 Jan; 35(1):203-212. PubMed ID: 36319940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Negative lymph node count as an independent prognostic factor in stage III patients after curative gastrectomy: A retrospective cohort study based on a multicenter database.
Zhang N; Deng J; Wang W; Sun Z; Wang Z; Xu H; Zhou Z; Liang H
Int J Surg; 2020 Feb; 74():44-52. PubMed ID: 31874262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of Lymph Nodes Examined on Survival in ypN0 Gastric Cancer Patients: a Population-Based Study.
MingHua Z; KeCheng Z; ZhenYu C; Lin C; ChunXi W; ZeLong Y
J Gastrointest Surg; 2021 Apr; 25(4):919-925. PubMed ID: 32318943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prognostic value of number of examined lymph nodes in patients with node-negative gastric cancer.
Jiao XG; Deng JY; Zhang RP; Wu LL; Wang L; Liu HG; Hao XS; Liang H
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Apr; 20(13):3640-8. PubMed ID: 24707149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Exceeding 30 ELNs is strongly recommended for pT3-4N0 patients with gastric cancer: A multicenter study of survival, recurrence, and prediction model.
Zhao L; Han W; Yang X; Zhao D; Niu P; Gao X; Wu Z; Zhang X; Li Z; Ji G; Chen Y
Cancer Sci; 2021 Aug; 112(8):3266-3277. PubMed ID: 34080256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Does Examined Lymph Node Count Influence Survival in Surgically Resected Early‑stage Pulmonary Typical Carcinoid Tumors?
Yang H; Liu T; Li M; Fang Z; Luo L
Am J Clin Oncol; 2022 Dec; 45(12):506-513. PubMed ID: 36413680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The impact of examined lymph node count on survival in squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix.
Zhou J; Zhang WW; Wu SG; He ZY; Sun JY; Wang Y; Chen QH
Cancer Manag Res; 2017; 9():315-322. PubMed ID: 28761376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The minimum number of examined lymph nodes was 24 for optimal survival of pathological T2-4 gastric cancer: a multi-center, hospital-based study covering 20 years of data.
Zhao L; Zhang F; Jiao F; Zhou X; Niu P; Han X; Wang W; Luan X; He M; Guan Q; Li Y; Zhao D; Gao J; Chen Y
BMC Cancer; 2023 Sep; 23(1):892. PubMed ID: 37735628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of Examined Lymph Node Number in Accurate Staging and Enhanced Survival in Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma-The More, the Better? A Cohort Study of 8,696 Cases From the US and China, 2010-2016.
Huang L; Zhang X; Wei Z; Xu A
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():539030. PubMed ID: 33585181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The minimal number of examined lymph nodes for accurate nodal staging and favorable prognosis in T1-2 supraglottic laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma.
Zhuge L; Wang S; Huang Z; Cai H; Li Z
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Oct; 49(10):107041. PubMed ID: 37633174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Count Removed at Sublobar Resection in Pathologic Stage IA Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.
He Z; Li Z; Xu S; Wu W; Zhu Q; Wang J; Wen W; Chen L
Clin Lung Cancer; 2021 Jul; 22(4):e563-e573. PubMed ID: 33214078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Survival Outcome of Gastric Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on the Optimal Number of Examined Lymph Nodes: A Nomogram- and Machine-Learning-Based Approach.
Lai Y; Xie J; Yin X; Lai W; Tang J; Du Y; Li Z
J Clin Med; 2023 Feb; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36769809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination of the ratio between metastatic and harvested lymph nodes and negative lymph node count as a prognostic indicator in advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective cohort study.
Jiang J; Chen J; Zhang H; Rao X; Hao T; Li M; Zhang C; Wu W; He Y
J Gastrointest Oncol; 2021 Oct; 12(5):2022-2034. PubMed ID: 34790370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of Removal of Lymph Nodes on Survival in Stage I-III Gastric Signet-Ring Cell Cancer: The More, the Better?
Jiang Y; Shao X; Li W; Hu H; Lu Y; Li Y; Tian Y
Ann Surg Oncol; 2024 Feb; 31(2):783-791. PubMed ID: 37991582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Prognostic factors of lymph node-negative metastasis gastric cancer].
Sun D; Xu H; Huang J
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Feb; 20(2):190-194. PubMed ID: 28226354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
