These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32954881)

  • 1. DuoStim cycles potentially boost reproductive outcomes in poor prognosis patients.
    Cecchino GN; Roque M; Cerrillo M; Filho RDR; Chiamba FDS; Hatty JH; García-Velasco JA
    Gynecol Endocrinol; 2021 Jun; 37(6):519-522. PubMed ID: 32954881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Luteal phase anovulatory follicles result in the production of competent oocytes: intra-patient paired case-control study comparing follicular versus luteal phase stimulations in the same ovarian cycle.
    Cimadomo D; Vaiarelli A; Colamaria S; Trabucco E; Alviggi C; Venturella R; Alviggi E; Carmelo R; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1442-1448. PubMed ID: 29912374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The best execution of the DuoStim strategy (double stimulation in the follicular and luteal phase of the same ovarian cycle) in patients who are poor ovarian responders.
    Luo Y; Sun L; Dong M; Zhang X; Huang L; Zhu X; Nong Y; Liu F
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2020 Oct; 18(1):102. PubMed ID: 33059712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The euploid blastocysts obtained after luteal phase stimulation show the same clinical, obstetric and perinatal outcomes as follicular phase stimulation-derived ones: a multicenter study.
    Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Alviggi E; Sansone A; Trabucco E; Dusi L; Buffo L; Barnocchi N; Fiorini F; Colamaria S; Giuliani M; Argento C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Hum Reprod; 2020 Nov; 35(11):2598-2608. PubMed ID: 32951051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Luteal phase after conventional stimulation in the same ovarian cycle might improve the management of poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria: a case series.
    Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Conforti A; Schimberni M; Giuliani M; D'Alessandro P; Colamaria S; Alviggi C; Rienzi L; Ubaldi FM
    Fertil Steril; 2020 Jan; 113(1):121-130. PubMed ID: 31837743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. How effective are the non-conventional ovarian stimulation protocols in ART? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Glujovsky D; Pesce R; Miguens M; Sueldo CE; Lattes K; Ciapponi A
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Dec; 37(12):2913-2928. PubMed ID: 33219862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Follicular versus luteal phase ovarian stimulation during the same menstrual cycle (DuoStim) in a reduced ovarian reserve population results in a similar euploid blastocyst formation rate: new insight in ovarian reserve exploitation.
    Ubaldi FM; Capalbo A; Vaiarelli A; Cimadomo D; Colamaria S; Alviggi C; Trabucco E; Venturella R; Vajta G; Rienzi L
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Jun; 105(6):1488-1495.e1. PubMed ID: 27020168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the Second Follicular Wave Phenomenon in Natural Cycle Assisted Reproduction: A Key Option for Poor Responders through Luteal Phase Oocyte Retrieval.
    Sfakianoudis K; Simopoulou M; Maziotis E; Giannelou P; Tsioulou P; Rapani A; Pantou A; Petroutsou K; Angeli I; Deligeoroglou E; Koutsilieris M; Pantos K
    Medicina (Kaunas); 2019 Mar; 55(3):. PubMed ID: 30875815
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the true place of a double stimulation and double oocyte retrieval in the same cycle for patients diagnosed with poor ovarian reserve? A systematic review including a meta-analytical approach.
    Sfakianoudis K; Pantos K; Grigoriadis S; Rapani A; Maziotis E; Tsioulou P; Giannelou P; Kontogeorgi A; Pantou A; Vlahos N; Koutsilieris M; Simopoulou M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Jan; 37(1):181-204. PubMed ID: 31797242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation May Improve Oocyte Retrieval and Oocyte Quality in Poor Ovarian Responders Undergoing In Vitro Fertilization: Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Prospective Pilot Study.
    Lin LT; Vitale SG; Chen SN; Wen ZH; Tsai HW; Chern CU; Tsui KH
    Adv Ther; 2018 Jun; 35(6):847-856. PubMed ID: 29869107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ovarian stimulation in the luteal phase: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Boots CE; Meister M; Cooper AR; Hardi A; Jungheim ES
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2016 Aug; 33(8):971-80. PubMed ID: 27146151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contribution of rescue in-vitro maturation versus double ovarian stimulation in ovarian stimulation cycles of poor-prognosis women.
    Liu Y; Jiang H; Du X; Huang J; Wang X; Hu Y; Ni F; Liu C
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2020 Apr; 40(4):511-517. PubMed ID: 32199798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Flexibility in starting ovarian stimulation at different phases of the menstrual cycle for treatment of infertile women with the use of in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
    Qin N; Chen Q; Hong Q; Cai R; Gao H; Wang Y; Sun L; Zhang S; Guo H; Fu Y; Ai A; Tian H; Lyu Q; Daya S; Kuang Y
    Fertil Steril; 2016 Aug; 106(2):334-341.e1. PubMed ID: 27114329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation increases the number of mature oocytes in older women with severe diminished ovarian reserve.
    Rashtian J; Zhang J
    Syst Biol Reprod Med; 2018 Jun; 64(3):216-219. PubMed ID: 29564925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Initiation of ovarian stimulation independent of the menstrual cycle: a case-control study.
    Buendgen NK; Schultze-Mosgau A; Cordes T; Diedrich K; Griesinger G
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2013 Oct; 288(4):901-4. PubMed ID: 23545834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing the practice of LuPOR for poor responders: a prospective study evaluating follicular fluid cfDNA levels during natural IVF cycles.
    Sfakianoudis K; Tsioulou P; Maziotis E; Giannelou P; Glava A; Grigoriadis S; Rapani A; Nezos A; Pantou A; Koutsilieris M; Pantos K; Mastorakos G; Simopoulou M
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 May; 37(5):1183-1194. PubMed ID: 32221790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predicting the total number of retrieved oocytes following double ovarian stimulation (DuoStim).
    La Marca A; Donno V; Longo M; Greco P; Cucinelli F; Varricchio MT; Listorti I; Greco E
    Hum Reprod; 2023 Sep; 38(9):1784-1788. PubMed ID: 37470235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Luteal-phase ovarian stimulation vs conventional ovarian stimulation in patients with normal ovarian reserve treated for IVF: a large retrospective cohort study.
    Wang N; Wang Y; Chen Q; Dong J; Tian H; Fu Y; Ai A; Lyu Q; Kuang Y
    Clin Endocrinol (Oxf); 2016 May; 84(5):720-8. PubMed ID: 26603821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Luteal Phase Ovarian Stimulation versus Follicular Phase Ovarian Stimulation results in different Human Cumulus cell genes expression: A pilot study.
    Chen YC; Li JY; Li CJ; Tsui KH; Wang PH; Wen ZH; Lin LT
    Int J Med Sci; 2021; 18(7):1600-1608. PubMed ID: 33746576
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Luteal Phase Stimulation in the Same Cycle Is an Effective Strategy to Rescue POSEIDON Poor Responders with No Embryos after the First Follicular Stimulation.
    Majumdar A; Majumdar G; Tiwari N; Singh A; Gupta SM; Satwik R
    J Hum Reprod Sci; 2023; 16(3):218-226. PubMed ID: 38045502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.