These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Strengthening the legal framework to regulate human genetic engineering in China. Yanlin C; Xueqian Z; Fei J Lancet; 2019 Mar; 393(10176):1097. PubMed ID: 30894263 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Heritable Genome Editing and the Downsides of a Global Moratorium. Macintosh KL CRISPR J; 2019 Oct; 2(5):272-279. PubMed ID: 31599680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CRISPR-Cas9 and the Promise of a Better Future. Raposo VL Eur J Health Law; 2019 Oct; 26(4):308-329. PubMed ID: 31597119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Democratic Governance of Human Germline Genome Editing. Jasanoff S; Hurlbut JB; Saha K CRISPR J; 2019 Oct; 2(5):266-271. PubMed ID: 31599682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Rogues and Regulation of Germline Editing. Charo RA N Engl J Med; 2019 Mar; 380(10):976-980. PubMed ID: 30650001 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Put human cloning on hold, say bioethicists. Marwick C JAMA; 1997 Jul; 278(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 9207322 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinton urges outlawing human cloning. Marshall E Science; 1997 Jun; 276(5319):1640. PubMed ID: 9206825 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Backing for anti-cloning bill reopens embryo debate. Wadman M Nature; 1997 Aug; 388(6642):505. PubMed ID: 9252174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Comments on the CRISPR Gene-edited babies' case. Cong Y Indian J Med Ethics; 2019; 4 (NS)(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 31791938 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. US panel to back longer cloning ban, ducks thornier questions. Wadman M Nature; 1997 May; 387(6630):217-8. PubMed ID: 9153375 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Panel weighs a law against cloning. Marshall E Science; 1997 May; 276(5316):1185-6. PubMed ID: 9182324 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Legal reflections on the case of genome-edited babies. Liu S Glob Health Res Policy; 2020; 5():24. PubMed ID: 32435694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The Challenges of Medical Ethics in China: Are Gene-Edited Babies Enough? Ye ZJ; Zhang XY; Liang J; Tang Y Sci Eng Ethics; 2020 Feb; 26(1):123-125. PubMed ID: 30719621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Creator of first gene edited babies faces "stern" punishment. Dyer O BMJ; 2019 Jan; 364():l346. PubMed ID: 30670454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A research program for the socioeconomic impacts of gene editing regulation. Whelan AI; Lema MA GM Crops Food; 2017 Jan; 8(1):74-83. PubMed ID: 28080208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The morality and ethics governing CRISPR-Cas9 patents in China. Peng Y Nat Biotechnol; 2016 Jun; 34(6):616-8. PubMed ID: 27281418 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The Future of Gene Editing - Toward Scientific and Social Consensus. Rosenbaum L N Engl J Med; 2019 Mar; 380(10):971-975. PubMed ID: 30649992 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]