BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32956707)

  • 1. Inter-fraction motion robustness and organ sparing potential of proton therapy for cervical cancer.
    Gort EM; Beukema JC; Matysiak W; Sijtsema NM; Aluwini S; Langendijk JA; Both S; Brouwer CL
    Radiother Oncol; 2021 Jan; 154():194-200. PubMed ID: 32956707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating the benefit of PBS vs. VMAT dose distributions in terms of dosimetric sparing and robustness against inter-fraction anatomical changes for pediatric abdominal tumors.
    Guerreiro F; Zachiu C; Seravalli E; Ribeiro CO; Janssens GO; Ries M; de Senneville BD; Maduro JH; Brouwer CL; Korevaar EW; Knopf AC; Raaymakers BW
    Radiother Oncol; 2019 Sep; 138():158-165. PubMed ID: 31302390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer.
    Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Retrospective Planning Study of Patients with Superior Sulcus Tumours Comparing Pencil Beam Scanning Protons to Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy.
    Wong SL; Alshaikhi J; Grimes H; Amos RA; Poynter A; Rompokos V; Gulliford S; Royle G; Liao Z; Sharma RA; Mendes R
    Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2021 Mar; 33(3):e118-e131. PubMed ID: 32798157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluating the influence of organ motion during photon vs. proton therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer using biological models.
    Busch K; G Andersen A; Casares-Magaz O; Petersen JBB; Bentzen L; Thörnqvist S; Muren LP
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):839-845. PubMed ID: 28464733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
    Deng X; Han C; Chen S; Xie C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Deng Z; Jin X
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PTV-based VMAT vs. robust IMPT for head-and-neck cancer: A probabilistic uncertainty analysis of clinical plan evaluation with the Dutch model-based selection.
    Rojo-Santiago J; Korevaar E; Perkó Z; Both S; Habraken SJM; Hoogeman MS
    Radiother Oncol; 2023 Sep; 186():109729. PubMed ID: 37301261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Organ sparing potential and inter-fraction robustness of adaptive intensity modulated proton therapy for lung cancer.
    van der Laan HP; Anakotta RM; Korevaar EW; Dieters M; Ubbels JF; Wijsman R; Sijtsema NM; Both S; Langendijk JA; Muijs CT; Knopf AC
    Acta Oncol; 2019 Dec; 58(12):1775-1782. PubMed ID: 31556764
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of dosimetries of carbon-ion pencil beam scanning, proton pencil beam scanning and volumetric modulated arc therapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer.
    Mori S; Bhattacharyya T; Furuichi W; Tohyama N; Nomoto A; Shinoto M; Takiyama H; Yamada S
    J Radiat Res; 2023 Jan; 64(1):162-170. PubMed ID: 36403118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial Report of Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy for Posthysterectomy Patients With Gynecologic Cancer.
    Lin LL; Kirk M; Scholey J; Taku N; Kiely JB; White B; Both S
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 May; 95(1):181-189. PubMed ID: 26372435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Weekly robustness evaluation of intensity-modulated proton therapy for oesophageal cancer.
    Anakotta RM; van der Laan HP; Visser S; Ribeiro CO; Dieters M; Langendijk JA; Both S; Korevaar EW; Sijtsema NM; Knopf A; Muijs CT
    Radiother Oncol; 2020 Oct; 151():66-72. PubMed ID: 32663538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing photon and proton-based hypofractioned SBRT for prostate cancer accounting for robustness and realistic treatment deliverability.
    Goddard LC; Brodin NP; Bodner WR; Garg MK; Tomé WA
    Br J Radiol; 2018 May; 91(1085):20180010. PubMed ID: 29436852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Target coverage and cardiopulmonary sparing with the updated ESTRO-ACROP contouring guidelines for postmastectomy radiation therapy after breast reconstruction: a treatment planning study using VMAT and proton PBS techniques.
    Milligan MG; Zieminski S; Johnson A; Depauw N; Rosado N; Specht MC; Liao EC; Jimenez RB
    Acta Oncol; 2021 Nov; 60(11):1440-1451. PubMed ID: 34313520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-course PET based simultaneous integrated boost for locally advanced cervical cancer.
    Arnesen MR; Rekstad BL; Stokke C; Bruheim K; Løndalen AM; Hellebust TP; Malinen E
    Radiat Oncol; 2016 Mar; 11():39. PubMed ID: 26968827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which technique for radiation is most beneficial for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer? Intensity modulated proton therapy versus intensity modulated photon treatment, helical tomotherapy and volumetric arc therapy for primary radiation - an intraindividual comparison.
    Marnitz S; Wlodarczyk W; Neumann O; Koehler C; Weihrauch M; Budach V; Cozzi L
    Radiat Oncol; 2015 Apr; 10():91. PubMed ID: 25896675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dose and robustness comparison of nominal, daily and accumulated doses for photon and proton treatment of sinonasal cancer.
    Argota-Perez R; Sharma MB; Elstrøm UV; Møller DS; Grau C; Jensen K; Holm AIS; Korreman SS
    Radiother Oncol; 2022 Aug; 173():102-108. PubMed ID: 35667574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Anatomically robust proton therapy using multiple planning computed tomography scans for locally advanced prostate cancer.
    Busch K; Dahl B; Petersen SE; Rønde HS; Bentzen L; Pilskog S; Muren LP
    Acta Oncol; 2021 May; 60(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 33646069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Whole-ventricular irradiation for intracranial germ cell tumors: Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam scanned protons, intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy.
    Correia D; Terribilini D; Zepter S; Pica A; Bizzocchi N; Volken W; Stieb S; Ahlhelm F; Herrmann E; Fix MK; Manser P; Aebersold DM; Weber DC
    Clin Transl Radiat Oncol; 2019 Feb; 15():53-61. PubMed ID: 30734001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Small spot size versus large spot size: Effect on plan quality for lung cancer in pencil beam scanning proton therapy.
    Rana S; Rosenfeld AB
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Feb; 23(2):e13512. PubMed ID: 34989458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robustness assessment of clinical adaptive proton and photon radiotherapy for oesophageal cancer in the model-based approach.
    Visser S; O Ribeiro C; Dieters M; Mul VE; Niezink AGH; van der Schaaf A; Knopf AC; Langendijk JA; Korevaar EW; Both S; Muijs CT
    Radiother Oncol; 2022 Dec; 177():197-204. PubMed ID: 36368472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.