BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957173)

  • 1. Non-minimum phase viscoelastic properties of soft biological tissues.
    Kobayashi Y; Okamura N; Tsukune M; Fujie MG; Tanaka M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103795. PubMed ID: 32957173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Simple empirical model for identifying rheological properties of soft biological tissues.
    Kobayashi Y; Tsukune M; Miyashita T; Fujie MG
    Phys Rev E; 2017 Feb; 95(2-1):022418. PubMed ID: 28297883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Hyperelastic and viscoelastic characterization of hepatic tissue under uniaxial tension in time and frequency domain.
    Estermann SJ; Pahr DH; Reisinger A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Dec; 112():104038. PubMed ID: 32889334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A parameter reduced adaptive quasi-linear viscoelastic model for soft biological tissue in uniaxial tension.
    Aryeetey OJ; Frank M; Lorenz A; Estermann SJ; Reisinger AG; Pahr DH
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Feb; 126():104999. PubMed ID: 34999491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Non-integer viscoelastic constitutive law to model soft biological tissues to in-vivo indentation.
    Demirci N; Tönük E
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2014; 16(4):13-21. PubMed ID: 25597890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An inverse power-law distribution of molecular bond lifetimes predicts fractional derivative viscoelasticity in biological tissue.
    Palmer BM; Tanner BC; Toth MJ; Miller MS
    Biophys J; 2013 Jun; 104(11):2540-52. PubMed ID: 23746527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Modeling the mechanical properties of liver fibrosis in rats.
    Zhu Y; Chen X; Zhang X; Chen S; Shen Y; Song L
    J Biomech; 2016 Jun; 49(9):1461-1467. PubMed ID: 27017300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Viscoelasticity imaging of biological tissues with phase-resolved photoacoustic measurement.
    Gao G; Yang S; Xing D
    Opt Lett; 2011 Sep; 36(17):3341-3. PubMed ID: 21886204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of viscoelasticity on residual strain in aortic soft tissues.
    Zhang W; Sommer G; Niestrawska JA; Holzapfel GA; Nordsletten D
    Acta Biomater; 2022 Mar; 140():398-411. PubMed ID: 34823042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A simple viscoelastic model for soft tissues in the frequency range 6-20 MHz.
    Yang X; Church CC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2006 Aug; 53(8):1404-11. PubMed ID: 16921892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A strain-hardening bi-power law for the nonlinear behaviour of biological soft tissues.
    Nicolle S; Vezin P; Palierne JF
    J Biomech; 2010 Mar; 43(5):927-32. PubMed ID: 19954778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How preservation time changes the linear viscoelastic properties of porcine liver.
    Wex C; Stoll A; Fröhlich M; Arndt S; Lippert H
    Biorheology; 2013; 50(3-4):115-31. PubMed ID: 23863278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A model of lung parenchyma stress relaxation using fractional viscoelasticity.
    Dai Z; Peng Y; Mansy HA; Sandler RH; Royston TJ
    Med Eng Phys; 2015 Aug; 37(8):752-8. PubMed ID: 26050200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A finite nonlinear hyper-viscoelastic model for soft biological tissues.
    Panda SK; Buist ML
    J Biomech; 2018 Mar; 69():121-128. PubMed ID: 29397112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identification of the viscoelastic properties of soft materials at low frequency: performance, ill-conditioning and extrapolation capabilities of fractional and exponential models.
    Ciambella J; Paolone A; Vidoli S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2014 Sep; 37():286-98. PubMed ID: 24967977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Viscoelastic properties of passive skeletal muscle in compression: stress-relaxation behaviour and constitutive modelling.
    Van Loocke M; Lyons CG; Simms CK
    J Biomech; 2008; 41(7):1555-66. PubMed ID: 18396290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Viscoelastic shear properties of the fresh porcine lens.
    Schachar RA; Chan RW; Fu M
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 91(3):366-8. PubMed ID: 17035268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative characterization of viscoelastic behavior in tissue-mimicking phantoms and ex vivo animal tissues.
    Maccabi A; Shin A; Namiri NK; Bajwa N; St John M; Taylor ZD; Grundfest W; Saddik GN
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(1):e0191919. PubMed ID: 29373598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic measurement of soft tissue viscoelastic properties with a torsional resonator device.
    Valtorta D; Mazza E
    Med Image Anal; 2005 Oct; 9(5):481-90. PubMed ID: 16006169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Characterizing viscoelastic mechanical properties of highly compliant polymers and biological tissues using impact indentation.
    Mijailovic AS; Qing B; Fortunato D; Van Vliet KJ
    Acta Biomater; 2018 Apr; 71():388-397. PubMed ID: 29477455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.