These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957206)

  • 1. Retention and wear of resin matrix attachments for implant overdentures.
    Wichmann N; Kern M; Taylor T; Wille S; Passia N
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103901. PubMed ID: 32957206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Retentive Properties of Two Stud Attachments with Polyetherketoneketone or Nylon Insert in Mandibular Implant Overdentures.
    Choi JW; Yun BH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018; 33(5):1079-1088. PubMed ID: 30231095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term retention behaviour of resin matrix attachment systems for overdentures.
    Passia N; Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2016 Apr; 57():88-94. PubMed ID: 26705935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of implant angulation and patrice on the retention of overdenture attachment systems: An in vitro study.
    Frantz K; Funkenbusch P; Feng C; Tsigarida A; Chochlidakis K; Lo Russo L; Ercoli C
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; 33(5):452-459. PubMed ID: 37212388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the wear pattern of two attachment systems of dissimilar materials for mandibular implant-retained overdentures: an in-vitro study.
    Ramadan RE; Mohamed FS; Abd-Ellah ME
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Nov; 23(1):948. PubMed ID: 38036982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Retention and wear behaviors of two implant overdenture stud-type attachments at different implant angulations.
    Choi JW; Bae JH; Jeong CM; Huh JB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):628-635. PubMed ID: 27863857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two resilient attachment systems for implant-/mucosa-supported overdentures with a PEKK framework: a clinical pilot study.
    Dörsam I; Hombach A; Bourauel C; Stark H
    Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Apr; 26(4):3707-3719. PubMed ID: 34935067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of in vitro cyclic dislodging on retentive force and removal torque of three overdenture attachment systems.
    Kobayashi M; Srinivasan M; Ammann P; Perriard J; Ohkubo C; Müller F; Belser UC; Schimmel M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):426-34. PubMed ID: 23566266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The in vitro effect of different implant angulations and cyclic dislodgement on the retentive properties of an overdenture attachment system.
    Al-Ghafli SA; Michalakis KX; Hirayama H; Kang K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 19703620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brushing effect on the retentive force of retentive inserts in three denture attachments: An in vitro study.
    Kamonkhantikul K; Homsiang W; Arksornnukit M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):487.e1-487.e12. PubMed ID: 35934574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical performance and material properties of single-implant overdenture attachment systems.
    Alsabeeha NH; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(3):247-54. PubMed ID: 21519573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of Distal Implant Inclination on Dislodging Forces of Different Locator Attachments Used for Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ashmawy TM
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e666-e674. PubMed ID: 29143403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Retention loss and wear assessment of three attachment systems for implant retained-mandibular overdentures: An in vitro study.
    Wakam R; Ramalingam S; Mawussi KB; Gorin C; Benoit A
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2024 Feb; 150():106269. PubMed ID: 38043259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of retention and wear of a titanium-formed stud overdenture attachment with different interimplant angulations after simulated clinical use: An in vitro study.
    Elsonbaty MA; Alshimy AM; Abdul-Monem MM; Neena AF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Aug; 128(2):205.e1-205.e10. PubMed ID: 35842280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of interimplant divergence on the retention characteristics of locator attachments, a laboratory study.
    Stephens GJ; di Vitale N; O'Sullivan E; McDonald A
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):467-75. PubMed ID: 24750293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In vitro measurement of the retention force of two stud attachment systems during cyclic load.
    Friedrichsen M; Dirksen D; Runte C
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 36779671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of implant angulation and cyclic dislodging on the retentive force of two different overdenture attachments - an in vitro study.
    Srinivasan M; Schimmel M; Badoud I; Ammann P; Herrmann FR; Müller F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):604-11. PubMed ID: 26085188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of aging of PEEK attachment inserts on the pull-off force of implant-retained overdentures - A laboratory study.
    Koenig A; Rotenburg L; Fuchs F; Sander S; Lethaus B; Hahnel S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Dec; 34(12):1363-1372. PubMed ID: 37694944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of implant angulations and attachment configurations on the retentive forces of locator attachment-retained overdentures.
    Uludag B; Polat S; Sahin V; Çomut AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1053-7. PubMed ID: 25216129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In vitro comparison of the retentive properties of ball and locator attachments for implant overdentures.
    Türk PE; Geckili O; Türk Y; Günay V; Bilgin T
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1106-13. PubMed ID: 25216136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.