These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957206)

  • 21. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. In Vitro Evaluation of the Retentive Effectiveness of Axial Attachments Used in Implant-Retained Overdentures After 1 Year of Function.
    Chávarri-Prado D; Brizuela-Velasco A; Diéguez-Pereira M; Chento-Valiente Y; Estrada-Martínez A; Pérez-Pevida E; Álvarez-Arenal Á
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(3):556-562. PubMed ID: 35727248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of retention and strain energies of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Petropoulos VC; Mante FK
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jun; 20(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 21539646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of LOCATOR attachments with different retentive forces on the stability of 2-implant-retained mandibular overdenture.
    Liu W; Zhang X; Qing H; Wang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):224-229. PubMed ID: 31780109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Frictional wear of stud implant overdenture abutments after 2 years of in vitro simulated function.
    Castrillon JM; Piermatti J; Achong-Bowe R; Hardigan P; Thompson J
    Gen Dent; 2022; 70(5):54-57. PubMed ID: 35993934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. In vitro retention force changes during cyclic dislodging of three novel attachment systems for implant overdentures with different implant angulations.
    Maniewicz S; Badoud I; Herrmann FR; Chebib N; Ammann P; Schimmel M; Müller F; Srinivasan M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Apr; 31(4):315-327. PubMed ID: 31876004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Attachment systems for implant overdenture: influence of implant inclination on retentive and lateral forces.
    Yang TC; Maeda Y; Gonda T; Kotecha S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Nov; 22(11):1315-9. PubMed ID: 21426402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Analysis of retention and wear of ball attachments.
    Wolf K; Ludwig K; Hartfil H; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2009 May; 40(5):405-12. PubMed ID: 19582245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of simulated masticatory loading on the retention of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Abi Nader S; de Souza RF; Fortin D; De Koninck L; Fromentin O; Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2011 Mar; 38(3):157-64. PubMed ID: 20819139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The retentive forces of the locator attachment system at different angulations.
    Stergiou A; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2012 Dec; 20(4):168-74. PubMed ID: 23495558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maximum dislodging forces of implant overdenture stud attachments.
    Petropoulos VC; Smith W
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):526-35. PubMed ID: 12182295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Retentive Properties of O-Ring and Locator Attachments for Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Elhaddad AA; Khirallah AS
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):568-576. PubMed ID: 27589487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. In Vitro Effect of Mastication on the Retention and Wear of Locator Attachments in a Flat Mandibular Ridge Model.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Majzoub Z; Nahas P; Berberi A; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e744-e751. PubMed ID: 29968276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Cyclic Dislodging on the Retention of Two Attachment Systems for Implant-supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Tohme H; Makzoume J; Boulos P; Fakhoury J; Yared C; Salameh Z; Daou M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1386-1392. PubMed ID: 30602646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Retentive force variations of stud attachments for implant overdentures.
    Boulos PJ; Akiki LA; Makzoumé JE; Fakhoury J; Tohmé H; El Hage FS
    Gen Dent; 2018; 66(4):41-45. PubMed ID: 29964247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the retention characteristics of various stud attachment systems for implant retained overdenture.
    Gonuldas F; Tokar E; Ozturk C
    Acta Bioeng Biomech; 2018; 20(4):135-141. PubMed ID: 30821291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Investigation of retentive force reduction and wear of the locator attachment system with different implant angulations.
    Rabbani S; Juszczyk AS; Clark RK; Radford DR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):556-63. PubMed ID: 25671627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of Various Retentive Element Materials on Retention of Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    Chindarungruangrat A; Eiampongpaiboon T; Jirajariyavej B
    Molecules; 2022 Jun; 27(12):. PubMed ID: 35745048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retention of implant-supported overdentures at different implant angulations: comparing Locator and ball attachments.
    Sultana N; Bartlett DW; Suleiman M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Nov; 28(11):1406-1410. PubMed ID: 28191678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of implant angulation upon retention of overdenture attachments.
    Gulizio MP; Agar JR; Kelly JR; Taylor TD
    J Prosthodont; 2005 Mar; 14(1):3-11. PubMed ID: 15733129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.