These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957206)

  • 41. Retention of mandibular implant-retained overdentures with two different attachment designs: An in vitro study.
    Ramadan RE; Mohamed FS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):738.e1-738.e6. PubMed ID: 32165012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Implant-Retained Overdentures Using an Attachment with True-Alignment Correction: A Case Series.
    Srinivasan M; Kalberer N; Maniewicz S; Müller F
    Int J Prosthodont; 2019; 32(6):482-496. PubMed ID: 31664264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Attachment systems for mandibular single-implant overdentures: an in vitro retention force investigation on different designs.
    Alsabeeha N; Atieh M; Swain MV; Payne AG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):160-6. PubMed ID: 20305857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Retention force and allowable range of the angle of an implant-supported overdenture attachment system using healing screws and a silicone resilient denture liner.
    Koike T; Kubo K; Kono T; Ueda T; Sakurai K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Apr; 123(4):630-634. PubMed ID: 31383531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Peri-implant strain around mesially inclined two-implant-retained mandibular overdentures with Locator attachments.
    Elsyad MA; Eltowery SM; Gebreel AA
    J Oral Sci; 2017 Dec; 59(4):483-490. PubMed ID: 29093282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Using an Attachment System with PEEK Matrices for Single-Implant Overdentures: In Vitro Retention Force.
    Fugariu I; de Souza RF; Rosas E; Borie E
    J Clin Med; 2023 Mar; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 36983161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Effect of Simulated Mastication on the Retention of Locator Attachments for Implant-Supported Overdentures: An In Vitro Pilot Study.
    Tehini G; Baba NZ; Berberi A; Majzoub Z; Bassal H; Rifai K
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Jan; 29(1):74-79. PubMed ID: 28913855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Retention force and deformation of an innovative attachment model for mini-implant-retained overdentures.
    Valente MLC; Shimano MVW; Agnelli JAM; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):129-134. PubMed ID: 29961625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessment of the changes in retention and surface topography of attachments for maxillary 4-implant-retained overdentures.
    Kuo HY; Kuo PJ; Bittner N; Cavallaro J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):413.e1-413.e9. PubMed ID: 34127250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Locator Versus Bar Attachment Effect on the Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Dayekh MA; Khalifa AK
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e627-e636. PubMed ID: 28387994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Attachment systems for mandibular two-implant overdentures: a review of in vitro investigations on retention and wear features.
    Alsabeeha NH; Payne AG; Swain MV
    Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(5):429-40. PubMed ID: 20095190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Wear of ceramic and titanium ball attachments in subjects with an implant-retained overdenture: a controlled clinical trial.
    Büttel AE; Lüthy H; Sendi P; Marinello CP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):109-13. PubMed ID: 22304745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Retention of prefabricated attachments for implant stabilized overdentures in the edentulous mandible: an in vitro study.
    Setz I; Lee SH; Engel E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Sep; 80(3):323-9. PubMed ID: 9760365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Comparison of retention and stability of two implant-retained overdentures based on implant location.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):515-21. PubMed ID: 24819528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of Labial Implant Inclination on the Retention and Stability of Different Resilient Stud Attachments for Mandibular Implant Overdentures: An In vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Emera RM; Ibrahim AM
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2019; 34(2):381–389. PubMed ID: 30703183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. In vitro measurement of the retention force of two stud attachment systems during cyclic load.
    Friedrichsen M; Dirksen D; Runte C
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Feb; 33(2):164-170. PubMed ID: 36779671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. In Vitro Effects of Cyclic Dislodgement on Retentive Properties of Various Titanium-Based Dental Implant Overdentures Attachment System.
    Kang TY; Kim JH; Kim KM; Kwon JS
    Materials (Basel); 2019 Nov; 12(22):. PubMed ID: 31744164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Wear simulation effects on overdenture stud attachments.
    Rutkunas V; Mizutani H; Takahashi H; Iwasaki N
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):845-53. PubMed ID: 22123008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of the Retention of Conventional and Polyvinyl Siloxane Matrix Materials with Different Patrices for Implant-Retained Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Yılmaz E; Gencel B; Geckili O; Sakar O
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(3):311–318. PubMed ID: 33616579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The effect of number and distribution of unsplinted maxillary implants on the load transfer in implant-retained maxillary overdentures: an in vitro study.
    Damghani S; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
    J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Jun; 107(6):358-65. PubMed ID: 22633591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.