These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957206)

  • 61. Influence of matrix attachment installation load on movement and resultant forces in implant overdentures.
    Goto T; Nagao K; Ishida Y; Tomotake Y; Ichikawa T
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Feb; 24(2):156-63. PubMed ID: 24975368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Freedom of rotation of selected overdenture attachments: an in vitro study.
    Chen IC; Brudvik JS; Mancl LA; Rubenstein JE; Chitswe K; Raigrodski AJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Aug; 106(2):78-86. PubMed ID: 21821161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Effect of implant angulation on attachment retention in mandibular two-implant overdentures: a clinical study.
    Jabbour Z; Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Correa JA; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):565-71. PubMed ID: 23305358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Axial and Nonaxial Retention Forces of Different Designs of Milled Bar Attachments for Maxillary Implant Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Mahrous AI; El Afandy HM; Elsyad MA; Mohamed SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2022; 37(6):1195-1201. PubMed ID: 36450025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Mandibular Denture Base Deformation with Locator and Ball Attachments of Implant-Retained Overdentures.
    ELsyad MA; Errabti HM; Mustafa AZ
    J Prosthodont; 2016 Dec; 25(8):656-664. PubMed ID: 26376338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Effects of posterior ridge resorption and attachment wear on periimplant strain in mandibular two-implant-supported overdentures.
    Jo DW; Dong JK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Dec; 114(6):839-47. PubMed ID: 26372626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
    Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. An in vitro study of non-axial forces upon the retention of an O-ring attachment.
    Rodrigues RC; Faria AC; Macedo AP; Sartori IA; de Mattos Mda G; Ribeiro RF
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Dec; 20(12):1314-9. PubMed ID: 19681968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. In vitro assessment of polyetheretherketone for an attachment component for an implant-retained overdenture.
    da Silva GG; Shimano MVW; Macedo AP; da Costa Valente ML; Dos Reis AC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Feb; 127(2):319.e1-319.e8. PubMed ID: 34857392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of retention and stability of implant-retained overdentures based upon implant number and distribution.
    Scherer MD; McGlumphy EA; Seghi RR; Campagni WV
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1619-28. PubMed ID: 24278931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Testing the retention of attachments for implant overdentures - validation of an original force measurement system.
    Fromentin O; Lassauzay C; Abi Nader S; Feine J; de Albuquerque Junior RF
    J Oral Rehabil; 2010 Jan; 37(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 19912482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Clinical evaluation of inter-implant distance influence on the wear characteristics of low-profile stud attachments used in mandibular implant‑retained overdentures.
    El Mekawy N; Elhawary MY
    J Clin Exp Dent; 2019 Jan; 11(1):e33-e41. PubMed ID: 30697392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Retentive characteristics of individual and prefabricated polyvinylsiloxane overdenture attachments: alternative treatment options for geriatric patients.
    Schweyen R; Arnold C; Setz JM; Hey J
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Mar; 23(3):1425-1434. PubMed ID: 30032470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Fracture Resistance of Zirconia, Polyetheretherketone, and Polyetherketoneketone Implant Abutments After Aging.
    Türksayar AAD; Atsü SS
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(2):332-340. PubMed ID: 33909724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Retention of metallic and non-metallic double-crown-retained mandibular overdentures on implants: An in-vitro study.
    Elkabbany A; Kern M; Elkhadem AH; Wille S; A Amer A; Chaar MS
    J Prosthodont Res; 2020 Oct; 64(4):384-390. PubMed ID: 32063542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Effect of dislodging forces on mandibular implant attachment-retained overdenture.
    Elkerdawy MW; Radi IA
    Implant Dent; 2011 Jun; 20(3):246-54. PubMed ID: 21613951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Stress analysis of mandibular two-implant overdenture with different attachment systems.
    Takeshita S; Kanazawa M; Minakuchi S
    Dent Mater J; 2011; 30(6):928-34. PubMed ID: 22123019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Retention and Stability of Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures Using Different Types of Resilient Attachments: An In Vitro Study.
    ELsyad MA; Agha NN; Habib AA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(5):1040-8. PubMed ID: 27632258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Trend of change in retentive force for bar attachments with different materials.
    Saito M; Kanazawa M; Takahashi H; Uo M; Minakuchi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Dec; 112(6):1545-52. PubMed ID: 25023010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.