These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957237)
41. Validation and sensitivity of model-predicted proximal tibial displacement and tray micromotion in cementless total knee arthroplasty under physiological loading conditions. Yang H; Bayoglu R; Renani MS; Behnam Y; Navacchia A; Clary C; Rullkoetter PJ J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Sep; 109():103793. PubMed ID: 32347217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Extent of vertical cementing as a predictive factor for radiolucency in revision total knee arthroplasty. Ro du H; Cho Y; Lee S; Chung KY; Kim SH; Lee YM; Lee JK; Lee MC Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2016 Aug; 24(8):2710-7. PubMed ID: 26831861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Torsional stability of primary total knee replacement tibial prostheses: a biomechanical study in cadaveric bone. Sala M; Taylor M; Tanner KE J Arthroplasty; 1999 Aug; 14(5):610-5. PubMed ID: 10475562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Use of stepped porous titanium metaphyseal sleeves for tibial defects in revision total knee arthroplasty: short term results. Barnett SL; Mayer RR; Gondusky JS; Choi L; Patel JJ; Gorab RS J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1219-24. PubMed ID: 24444570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Tibial implant fixation in TKA worth a revision?-how to avoid stress-shielding even for stiff metallic implants. Eidel B; Gote A; Fritzen CP; Ohrndorf A; Christ HJ Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2021 Feb; 24(3):320-332. PubMed ID: 33063557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Results of Cemented vs Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Using the Same Implant Design. Miller AJ; Stimac JD; Smith LS; Feher AW; Yakkanti MR; Malkani AL J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1089-1093. PubMed ID: 29275115 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Isolated revision of the polyethylene component at revision total knee arthroplasty has excellent survivorship at ten years. Greenwell PH; Shield WP; Chapman DM; Dalury DF Bone Joint J; 2019 Jul; 101-B(7_Supple_C):104-107. PubMed ID: 31256651 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Total and partial knee arthroplasty implants that maintain native load transfer in the tibia. Munford MJ; Stoddart JC; Liddle AD; Cobb JP; Jeffers JRT Bone Joint Res; 2022 Feb; 11(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 35168367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Clinical Outcomes of Offset Stem Couplers with or without Cone Augmentation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty. Fiedler B; Bieganowski T; Singh V; Marwin S; Rozell JC; Schwarzkopf R J Knee Surg; 2024 Mar; 37(4):297-302. PubMed ID: 37142239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Customized Knee Prosthesis in Treatment of Giant Cell Tumors of the Proximal Tibia: Application of 3-Dimensional Printing Technology in Surgical Design. Luo W; Huang L; Liu H; Qu W; Zhao X; Wang C; Li C; Yu T; Han Q; Wang J; Qin Y Med Sci Monit; 2017 Apr; 23():1691-1700. PubMed ID: 28388595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Outcome of revision total knee arthroplasty with the use of trabecular metal cone for reconstruction of severe bone loss at the proximal tibia. Jensen CL; Winther N; Schrøder HM; Petersen MM Knee; 2014 Dec; 21(6):1233-7. PubMed ID: 25212989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Better clinical outcomes and overall higher survival with hybrid versus cemented primary total knee arthroplasty: a minimum 15 years follow-up. Lizaur-Utrilla A; Miralles-Muñoz FA; Ruiz-Lozano M; González-Parreño S; Alonso-Montero C; Lopez-Prats FA Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2021 Mar; 29(3):832-837. PubMed ID: 32347345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Revision of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using the in situ referencing technique. Weißenberger M; Petersen N; Bölch S; Rak D; Arnholdt J; Rudert M; Holzapfel BM Oper Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Aug; 32(4):273-283. PubMed ID: 32140741 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of cementless and hybrid cemented total knee arthroplasty. Lass R; Kubista B; Holinka J; Pfeiffer M; Schuller S; Stenicka S; Windhager R; Giurea A Orthopedics; 2013 Apr; 36(4):e420-7. PubMed ID: 23590780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Standardized Fixation Zones and Cone Assessments for Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Deep Learning. Jang SJ; Flevas DA; Kunze KN; Anderson CG; Fontana MA; Boettner F; Sculco TP; Baldini A; Sculco PK J Arthroplasty; 2023 Jun; 38(6S):S259-S265.e2. PubMed ID: 36791885 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Outcomes of a technique combining diaphyseal impaction grafting and metaphyseal cones for severe bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty. Bedard NA; Cates RA; Lewallen DG; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Berry DJ; Abdel MP Bone Joint J; 2020 Jun; 102-B(6_Supple_A):116-122. PubMed ID: 32475283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Influence of extension stem length and diameter on clinical and radiographic outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty. Lee SH; Shih HN; Chang CH; Lu TW; Chang YH; Lin YC BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2020 Jan; 21(1):15. PubMed ID: 31914984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]