These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

445 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957747)

  • 1. [Long-term oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus abdominal surgery in stage Ⅰa1 (LVSI
    Chen CL; Kang S; Chen BL; Yang Y; Guo JX; Hao M; Wang WL; Ji M; Sun LX; Wang L; Liang WT; Wang SG; Li WL; Fan HJ; Liu P; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):589-599. PubMed ID: 32957747
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparative study on the oncological prognosis of laparoscopy and laparotomy for stage IIA1 cervical squamous cell carcinoma.
    Chen C; Fang Z; Wang Q; Li W; Li P; Wang L; Kang S; Zhu B; Lin Z; Wang X; Wang L; Fan H; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):346-352. PubMed ID: 32859433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
    Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparison of the short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery for early-stage cervical cancer].
    He HY; Yang ZJ; Zeng DY; Yao DS; Fan JT; Zhao RF; Zhang JQ; Hu XX; Lin Z; Jiang YM; Li L
    Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2017 Jun; 39(6):458-466. PubMed ID: 28635237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison between robot-assisted radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: A multicentre retrospective study.
    Chen B; Ji M; Li P; Liu P; Zou W; Zhao Z; Qu B; Li Z; Bin X; Lang J; Wang H; Chen C
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 May; 157(2):429-436. PubMed ID: 32067814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparative analysis of the prognosis of patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing laparoscopic or abdominal surgery].
    Xu YP; Wang ZQ; Liang XD; Wang Y; Wang JL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):609-616. PubMed ID: 32957749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Oncologic outcomes of early stage cervical cancer performed operation by different laparoscopic surgical procedures: analysis of clinical data from mutiple centers].
    Ling KJ; Wang YZ; Zhang H; Zhang XY; Yang JJ; Luo CY; Song B; Zhang WX; Deng L; Chen GL; Li YD; Hu QY; Chen Y; Wang X; Zhang J; Ding JX; Ren T; Kang S; Hua KQ; Xiang Y; Cheng WW; Liang ZQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):617-623. PubMed ID: 32957750
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Efficacy and safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early cervical adenocarcinoma].
    Zhang YN; Li B; Wang YT; Liu SH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Sep; 55(9):600-608. PubMed ID: 32957748
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer patients without adjuvant treatment: Ancillary analysis of a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study (KGOG 1028).
    Paik ES; Lim MC; Kim MH; Kim YH; Song ES; Seong SJ; Suh DH; Lee JM; Lee C; Choi CH
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 154(3):547-553. PubMed ID: 31272738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of laparoscopic versus open radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter study in China.
    Hu TWY; Huang Y; Li N; Nie D; Li Z
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Aug; 30(8):1143-1150. PubMed ID: 32571892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hazard Ratio Analysis of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for IA1 With LVSI-IIA2 Cervical Cancer: Identifying the Possible Contraindications of Laparoscopic Surgery for Cervical Cancer.
    Li P; Liu P; Yang Y; Wang L; Liu J; Bin X; Lang J; Chen C
    Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1002. PubMed ID: 32733796
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for low-risk cervical cancer: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Lu A; Zhao H; Zhan X; Duan H; Li P; Zhao W; Yao J; Li D; Jiang H; Liu M; Bin X; Lang J
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):449-458. PubMed ID: 34406459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer: oncologic outcomes based on tumor diameter.
    He J; Hao M; Liu P; Liu Z; Lang J; Bin X; Chen C
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Sep; 30(9):1308-1316. PubMed ID: 32699022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 and tumor size <2 cm cervical cancer with visible or invisible tumors: a multicentre retrospective study.
    Li P; Chen L; Ni Y; Liu J; Li D; Guo J; Liu Z; Jin S; Xu Y; Li Z; Wang L; Bin X; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Mar; 32(2):e17. PubMed ID: 33470062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of survival outcomes between laparoscopic surgery and abdominal surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB2/IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Chen C; Guo J; Liu P; Li Z; Jiang H; Zhu Q; Bin X; Lang J
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2021 Apr; 47(4):1516-1526. PubMed ID: 33527615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
    Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison between laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical adenosquamous carcinoma at stage IA2 to IIA2: A multicenter retrospective study.
    Teng X; Kang S; Li W; Ding H; Ling B; Zhu L; Wang D; Lang J; Liu P; Chen C
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2023 Jun; 49(6):1592-1610. PubMed ID: 36919234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
    Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy for early stage cervical cancer: A propensity score-matched cohort study.
    Dai D; Huang H; Feng Y; Wan T; Liu Z; Tong C; Liu J
    Cancer Med; 2020 Dec; 9(24):9236-9245. PubMed ID: 33236825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.