These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957748)

  • 21. Preoperative Conization and Risk of Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Multicenter Study.
    Casarin J; Bogani G; Papadia A; Ditto A; Pinelli C; Garzon S; Donadello N; Laganà AS; Cromi A; Mueller M; Raspagliesi F; Ghezzi F
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):117-123. PubMed ID: 32320800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
    Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
    Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
    Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery.
    Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 148 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
    Yan X; Li G; Shang H; Lin F; Yang X; Zheng F
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22146764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
    Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
    Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
    N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the prognoses of FIGO stage I to stage II adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy.
    Mabuchi S; Okazawa M; Kinose Y; Matsuo K; Fujiwara M; Suzuki O; Morii E; Kamiura S; Ogawa K; Kimura T
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1389-97. PubMed ID: 22976497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Clinical analysis of 132 cases of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma and cervical adenocarcinoma].
    Meng YH; Li S; Hu T; Ma D; Lu YP; Wang H
    Chin J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 20038304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Trend in proportion and clinicopathological characteristics of young women with stage Ⅰa2 to Ⅱa2 cervical cancer].
    Wang W; Hao M; Chen CL; Liu P; Ling B; Kang S; Lu AW; Wang WL; Zhao WD; Zhu QY; Zhao YY; Zhao HW; Jin SL; Ni Y; Lang JH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):666-672. PubMed ID: 31648442
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
    Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
    Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Open nerve-plane sparing radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: evaluation on efficacy and long-term survival outcomes].
    Shu T; Li B; Zhao D; Wang YT; Liu SH
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 33486927
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
    Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
    Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
    Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Locoregional spread and survival of stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Hongladaromp W; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):887-90. PubMed ID: 24568513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Intratumoral lymphatic vessel density and clinicopathologic features of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
    Zaganelli FL; Carvalho FM; Almeida BG; Bacchi CE; Goes JC; Calil MA; Baracat EC; Carvalho JP
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21135594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early cervical cancer].
    Maffuz A; Quijano F; López D; Hernández-Ramírez D
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2010 Jul; 78(7):345-51. PubMed ID: 20931810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Clinicopathologic Factors of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Stages IB to IIB.
    Mabuchi Y; Yahata T; Kobayashi A; Tanizaki Y; Shiro M; Ota N; Yagi S; Minami S; Ino K
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Nov; 25(9):1677-82. PubMed ID: 26495760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 34.