651 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957748)
21. Incidence of adverse events in minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy in early cervical cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial.
Obermair A; Asher R; Pareja R; Frumovitz M; Lopez A; Moretti-Marques R; Rendon G; Ribeiro R; Tsunoda A; Behan V; Buda A; Bernadini MQ; Zhao H; Vieira M; Walker J; Spirtos NM; Yao S; Chetty N; Zhu T; Isla D; Tamura M; Nicklin J; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Coleman RL; Salvo G; Ramirez PT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 222(3):249.e1-249.e10. PubMed ID: 31586602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤ 2 cm: a case-matched control study.
Chen C; Liu P; Ni Y; Tang L; Xu Y; Bin X; Lang J
Int J Clin Oncol; 2020 May; 25(5):937-947. PubMed ID: 32062731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Survival of women with microinvasive adenocarcinoma of the cervix is not improved by radical surgery.
Bean LM; Ward KK; Plaxe SC; McHale MT
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 217(3):332.e1-332.e6. PubMed ID: 28522318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Outcome and prognostic factors of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in 148 patients with stage IB1 cervical cancer.
Yan X; Li G; Shang H; Lin F; Yang X; Zheng F
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Feb; 22(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 22146764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Effects of robotic and laparoscopic-assisted surgery on lymph node dissection and short-term outcomes in patients with Siewert II adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction].
Wang D; Cao S; Tan X; Liu S; Liu X; Niu Z; Chen D; Wang D; Zhang J; Lv L; Li Y; Jiang H; Guo D; Li Y; Li Z; Zhou Y
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Feb; 22(2):156-163. PubMed ID: 30799538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Pareja R; Lopez A; Vieira M; Ribeiro R; Buda A; Yan X; Shuzhong Y; Chetty N; Isla D; Tamura M; Zhu T; Robledo KP; Gebski V; Asher R; Behan V; Nicklin JL; Coleman RL; Obermair A
N Engl J Med; 2018 Nov; 379(20):1895-1904. PubMed ID: 30380365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of the prognoses of FIGO stage I to stage II adenosquamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix treated with radical hysterectomy.
Mabuchi S; Okazawa M; Kinose Y; Matsuo K; Fujiwara M; Suzuki O; Morii E; Kamiura S; Ogawa K; Kimura T
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Oct; 22(8):1389-97. PubMed ID: 22976497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Clinical analysis of 132 cases of cervical adenosquamous carcinoma and cervical adenocarcinoma].
Meng YH; Li S; Hu T; Ma D; Lu YP; Wang H
Chin J Cancer; 2010 Jan; 29(1):15-9. PubMed ID: 20038304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Trend in proportion and clinicopathological characteristics of young women with stage Ⅰa2 to Ⅱa2 cervical cancer].
Wang W; Hao M; Chen CL; Liu P; Ling B; Kang S; Lu AW; Wang WL; Zhao WD; Zhu QY; Zhao YY; Zhao HW; Jin SL; Ni Y; Lang JH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Oct; 54(10):666-672. PubMed ID: 31648442
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy versus radical abdominal hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: a multicenter analysis.
Rodriguez J; Rauh-Hain JA; Saenz J; Isla DO; Rendon Pereira GJ; Odetto D; Martinelli F; Villoslada V; Zapardiel I; Trujillo LM; Perez M; Hernandez M; Saadi JM; Raspagliesi F; Valdivia H; Siegrist J; Fu S; Hernandez Nava M; Echeverry L; Noll F; Ditto A; Lopez A; Hernandez A; Pareja R
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2021 Apr; 31(4):504-511. PubMed ID: 33504547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [Open nerve-plane sparing radical hysterectomy in locally advanced cervical cancer: evaluation on efficacy and long-term survival outcomes].
Shu T; Li B; Zhao D; Wang YT; Liu SH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Jan; 56(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 33486927
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Laparoscopic nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy without uterine manipulator for cervical cancer stage IB: description of the technique, our experience and results after the era of LACC trial.
Kavallaris A; Chalvatzas N; Gkoutzioulis A; Zygouris D
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Apr; 303(4):1039-1047. PubMed ID: 33068159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Efficacy of different surgical approaches in the clinical and survival outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer: protocol of a phase III multicentre randomised controlled trial in China.
Chao X; Li L; Wu M; Ma S; Tan X; Zhong S; Lang J; Cheng A; Li W
BMJ Open; 2019 Jul; 9(7):e029055. PubMed ID: 31362966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Clinical and Oncologic Outcomes of Robotic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Women With Cervical Cancer: Experience at a Referral Cancer Center.
Zanagnolo V; Minig L; Rollo D; Tomaselli T; Aletti G; Bocciolone L; Landoni F; Cardenas Rebollo JM; Maggioni A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Mar; 26(3):568-74. PubMed ID: 26825827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mini-laparoscopic versus robotic radical hysterectomy plus systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy in early cervical cancer patients. A multi-institutional study.
Corrado G; Fanfani F; Ghezzi F; Fagotti A; Uccella S; Mancini E; Sperduti I; Stevenazzi G; Scambia G; Vizza E
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2015 Jan; 41(1):136-41. PubMed ID: 25468748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Locoregional spread and survival of stage IIA1 versus stage IIA2 cervical cancer.
Hongladaromp W; Tantipalakorn C; Charoenkwan K; Srisomboon J
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(2):887-90. PubMed ID: 24568513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Intratumoral lymphatic vessel density and clinicopathologic features of patients with early-stage cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy.
Zaganelli FL; Carvalho FM; Almeida BG; Bacchi CE; Goes JC; Calil MA; Baracat EC; Carvalho JP
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Oct; 20(7):1225-31. PubMed ID: 21135594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node biopsy in early cervical cancer].
Maffuz A; Quijano F; López D; Hernández-Ramírez D
Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2010 Jul; 78(7):345-51. PubMed ID: 20931810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinicopathologic Factors of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Stages IB to IIB.
Mabuchi Y; Yahata T; Kobayashi A; Tanizaki Y; Shiro M; Ota N; Yagi S; Minami S; Ino K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Nov; 25(9):1677-82. PubMed ID: 26495760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
