These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32957841)

  • 1. Circles Are Detected Faster Than Downward-Pointing Triangles in a Speeded Response Task.
    Chuquichambi EG; Rey C; Llames R; Escudero JT; Dorado A; Munar E
    Perception; 2020 Oct; 49(10):1026-1042. PubMed ID: 32957841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Negative triangles: simple geometric shapes convey emotional valence.
    Watson DG; Blagrove E; Evans C; Moore L
    Emotion; 2012 Feb; 12(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 21787078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The shape of threat: simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention.
    Larson CL; Aronoff J; Stearns JJ
    Emotion; 2007 Aug; 7(3):526-34. PubMed ID: 17683209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Threatening shapes: the impact of simple geometric configurations on peripheral physiological markers.
    Armbruster D; Suchert V; Gärtner A; Strobel A
    Physiol Behav; 2014 Aug; 135():215-21. PubMed ID: 24976454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Emotional triangles: a test of emotion-based attentional capture by simple geometric shapes.
    Watson DG; Blagrove E; Selwood S
    Cogn Emot; 2011 Nov; 25(7):1149-64. PubMed ID: 21432646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An advantage for smooth compared with angular contours in the speed of processing shape.
    Bertamini M; Palumbo L; Redies C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Oct; 45(10):1304-1318. PubMed ID: 31282695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The hemispheric lateralization for processing geometric word/shape combinations: the Stroop-shape effect.
    Gier VS; Kreiner DS; Solso RL; Cox SL
    J Gen Psychol; 2010; 137(1):1-19. PubMed ID: 20198813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual search for schematic emotional faces: angry faces are more than crosses.
    Dickins DS; Lipp OV
    Cogn Emot; 2014; 28(1):98-114. PubMed ID: 23829333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simple geometric shapes are implicitly associated with affective value.
    Larson CL; Aronoff J; Steuer EL
    Motiv Emot; 2012 Sep; 36(3):404-413. PubMed ID: 30122793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of working memory on visual search for emotional facial expressions.
    Moriya J; Koster EH; De Raedt R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Oct; 40(5):1874-90. PubMed ID: 24999613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Unattended facial expressions asymmetrically bias the concurrent processing of nonemotional information.
    Maxwell JS; Shackman AJ; Davidson RJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Sep; 17(9):1386-95. PubMed ID: 16197692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-related shapes can hold the eyes.
    Dalmaso M; Castelli L; Galfano G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Sep; 72(9):2249-2260. PubMed ID: 30852940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dorsal and ventral visual stream contributions to perception-action interactions during pointing.
    Lee JH; van Donkelaar P
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Apr; 143(4):440-6. PubMed ID: 11914789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatial attention across perception and action.
    Israel MM; Jolicoeur P; Cohen A
    Psychol Res; 2018 Mar; 82(2):255-271. PubMed ID: 27778123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Functional asymmetry and interhemispheric cooperation in the perception of emotions from facial expressions.
    Tamietto M; Latini Corazzini L; de Gelder B; Geminiani G
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):389-404. PubMed ID: 16374630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does the standard search task predict performance in related tasks for Kanizsa-style illusory contours?
    Trick LM; Hardy NLA
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):478-499. PubMed ID: 31875311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contingent capture is weakened in search for multiple features from different dimensions.
    Biderman D; Biderman N; Zivony A; Lamy D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Dec; 43(12):1974-1992. PubMed ID: 28425733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of item clustering on visual search: It all depends on the nature of the visual search.
    Xu Y
    J Vis; 2010 Dec; 10(14):. PubMed ID: 21177422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Kanizsa subjective figures capture visual spatial attention: evidence from electrophysiological and behavioral data.
    Senkowski D; Röttger S; Grimm S; Foxe JJ; Herrmann CS
    Neuropsychologia; 2005; 43(6):872-86. PubMed ID: 15716159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Grasping remaps the distribution of visuospatial attention and enhances competing action activation.
    Colman H; Remington R; Kritikos A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Sep; 70(9):1892-1908. PubMed ID: 27434754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.