315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32958301)
1. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of 3D-printed dental casts.
Park JM; Jeon J; Koak JY; Kim SK; Heo SJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Sep; 126(3):427-437. PubMed ID: 32958301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of internal design on the accuracy of 3-dimensionally printed casts fabricated by stereolithography and digital light processing technology.
Chen Y; Li H; Zhai Z; Nakano T; Ishigaki S
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Sep; 130(3):381.e1-381.e7. PubMed ID: 37482533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of three-dimensional dental resin models created by fused deposition modeling, stereolithography, and Polyjet prototype technologies: A comparative study.
Rebong RE; Stewart KT; Utreja A; Ghoneima AA
Angle Orthod; 2018 May; 88(3):363-369. PubMed ID: 29509023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy evaluation of complete-arch models manufactured by three different 3D printing technologies: a three-dimensional analysis.
Emir F; Ayyildiz S
J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Aug; 65(3):365-370. PubMed ID: 33177305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Trueness and surface characteristics of 3-dimensional printed casts made with different technologies.
Young Kim RJ; Cho SM; Jung WS; Park JM
J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36635136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of 3-dimensional computer-aided manufactured single-tooth implant definitive casts.
Buda M; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):913-918. PubMed ID: 29961627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of intraoral scanning and CBCT to generate digital and 3D-printed casts by fused deposition modeling and digital light processing.
de Freitas BN; Mendonça LM; Cruvinel PB; de Lacerda TJ; Leite FGJ; Oliveira-Santos C; Tirapelli C
J Dent; 2023 Jan; 128():104387. PubMed ID: 36496106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Position Accuracy of Implant Analogs on 3D Printed Polymer versus Conventional Dental Stone Casts Measured Using a Coordinate Measuring Machine.
Revilla-León M; Gonzalez-Martín Ó; Pérez López J; Sánchez-Rubio JL; Özcan M
J Prosthodont; 2018 Jul; 27(6):560-567. PubMed ID: 29148121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dimensional accuracy and surface characteristics of complete-arch cast manufactured by six 3D printers.
Sim MY; Park JB; Kim DY; Kim HY; Park JM
Heliyon; 2024 May; 10(10):e30996. PubMed ID: 38778963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Accuracy of commercial 3D printers for the fabrication of surgical guides in dental implantology.
Rouzé l'Alzit F; Cade R; Naveau A; Babilotte J; Meglioli M; Catros S
J Dent; 2022 Feb; 117():103909. PubMed ID: 34852291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of a simplified 3D-printed implant surgical guide.
Kim T; Lee S; Kim GB; Hong D; Kwon J; Park JW; Kim N
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug; 124(2):195-201.e2. PubMed ID: 31753464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the accuracy of implants placed with CAD-CAM surgical templates manufactured with various 3D printers: An in vitro study.
Herschdorfer L; Negreiros WM; Gallucci GO; Hamilton A
J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jun; 125(6):905-910. PubMed ID: 32499166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Precision and trueness of dental models manufactured with different 3-dimensional printing techniques.
Kim SY; Shin YS; Jung HD; Hwang CJ; Baik HS; Cha JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):144-153. PubMed ID: 29287640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Accuracy, reproducibility, and dimensional stability of additively manufactured surgical templates.
Chen L; Lin WS; Polido WD; Eckert GJ; Morton D
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Sep; 122(3):309-314. PubMed ID: 30948293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital workflow: In vitro accuracy of 3D printed casts generated from complete-arch digital implant scans.
Papaspyridakos P; Chen YW; Alshawaf B; Kang K; Finkelman M; Chronopoulos V; Weber HP
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Nov; 124(5):589-593. PubMed ID: 31959396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of additive manufacturing process and storage condition on the dimensional accuracy and stability of 3D-printed dental casts.
Yousef H; Harris BT; Elathamna EN; Morton D; Lin WS
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):1041-1046. PubMed ID: 33785200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy of 3D Printed and Digital Casts Produced from Intraoral and Extraoral Scanners with Different Scanning Technologies: In Vitro Study.
Ellakany P; Aly NM; Al-Harbi F
J Prosthodont; 2022 Jul; 31(6):521-528. PubMed ID: 34661950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clear guidance to select the most accurate technologies for 3D printing dental models - A network meta-analysis
Németh A; Vitai V; Czumbel ML; Szabó B; Varga G; Kerémi B; Hegyi P; Hermann P; Borbély J
J Dent; 2023 Jul; 134():104532. PubMed ID: 37120090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Technical note: The use of 3D printing in dental anthropology collections.
Fiorenza L; Yong R; Ranjitkar S; Hughes T; Quayle M; McMenamin PG; Kaidonis J; Townsend GC; Adams JW
Am J Phys Anthropol; 2018 Oct; 167(2):400-406. PubMed ID: 30129183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Accuracy of Dental and Industrial 3D Printers.
Anadioti E; Kane B; Zhang Y; Bergler M; Mante F; Blatz MB
J Prosthodont; 2022 Mar; 31(S1):30-37. PubMed ID: 35313026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
