These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

334 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32958301)

  • 21. Evaluation of the accuracy of digital and 3D-printed casts compared with conventional stone casts.
    Ellakany P; Al-Harbi F; El Tantawi M; Mohsen C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Mar; 127(3):438-444. PubMed ID: 33308856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Trueness of 3-dimensionally printed complete arch implant analog casts.
    Gagnon-Audet A; An H; Jensen UF; Bratos M; Sorensen JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Aug; ():. PubMed ID: 37558526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A validation study of reconstructed rapid prototyping models produced by two technologies.
    Dietrich CA; Ender A; Baumgartner S; Mehl A
    Angle Orthod; 2017 Sep; 87(5):782-787. PubMed ID: 28459285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Precision and trueness of maxillary crowded models produced by 2 vat photopolymerization 3-dimensional printing techniques.
    Rey-Joly Maura C; Godinho J; Amorim M; Pinto R; Marques D; Jardim L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2021 Jul; 160(1):124-131. PubMed ID: 34172172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of storage temperature on the dimensional stability of DLP printed casts.
    Lee Y; Wang S; Yan P; Zhao Y; Liu Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Feb; 131(2):331.e1-331.e7. PubMed ID: 37978005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Influence of the three-dimensional printing technique and printing layer thickness on model accuracy.
    Zhang ZC; Li PL; Chu FT; Shen G
    J Orofac Orthop; 2019 Jul; 80(4):194-204. PubMed ID: 31172199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Accuracy of 3D Printed Implant Casts Versus Stone Casts: A Comparative Study in the Anterior Maxilla.
    Banjar A; Chen YW; Kostagianni A; Finkelman M; Papathanasiou A; Chochlidakis K; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Dec; 30(9):783-788. PubMed ID: 33474754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Dimensional accuracy of extrusion- and photopolymerization-based 3D printers: In vitro study comparing printed casts.
    Nestler N; Wesemann C; Spies BC; Beuer F; Bumann A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):103-110. PubMed ID: 32063385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of printing direction on stress distortion of three-dimensional printed dentures using stereolithography technology.
    Hada T; Kanazawa M; Iwaki M; Arakida T; Minakuchi S
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2020 Oct; 110():103949. PubMed ID: 32957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy of tooth positioning in 3D-printing aided manufactured complete dentures: An in vitro study.
    Deng K; Chen H; Wei W; Wang X; Sun Y
    J Dent; 2023 Apr; 131():104459. PubMed ID: 36804581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of 3-unit fixed dental prostheses fabricated on 3D-printed casts.
    Jang Y; Sim JY; Park JK; Kim WC; Kim HY; Kim JH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):135-142. PubMed ID: 31027960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluating and Comparing Flexure Strength of Dental Models Printed Using Fused Deposition Modelling, Digital Light Processing, and Stereolithography Apparatus Printers.
    Atwal N; Bhatnagar D
    Cureus; 2024 Feb; 16(2):e54312. PubMed ID: 38496206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Error analysis of stages involved in CBCT-guided implant placement with surgical guides when different printing technologies are used.
    Yeager B; Çakmak G; Zheng F; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Jan; ():. PubMed ID: 36690552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of 3D printing technology and print orientation on the trueness of additively manufactured definitive casts with different tooth preparations.
    Demirel M; Diken Türksayar AA; Donmez MB; Yilmaz B
    J Dent; 2024 Sep; 148():105244. PubMed ID: 39068858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Accuracy of 3D Printed Models Created by Two Technologies of Printers with Different Designs of Model Base.
    Rungrojwittayakul O; Kan JY; Shiozaki K; Swamidass RS; Goodacre BJ; Goodacre CJ; Lozada JL
    J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):124-128. PubMed ID: 31498957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interproximal distance analysis of stereolithographic casts made by CAD-CAM technology: An in vitro study.
    Hoffman M; Cho SH; Bansal NK
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Nov; 118(5):624-630. PubMed ID: 28477918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Accuracy of cone beam computed tomography-derived casts: A comparative study.
    Shujaat S; Shaheen E; Novillo F; Politis C; Jacobs R
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Jan; 125(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 32044107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Dimensional Accuracy of Dental Models for Three-Unit Prostheses Fabricated by Various 3D Printing Technologies.
    Yoo SY; Kim SK; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim JG
    Materials (Basel); 2021 Mar; 14(6):. PubMed ID: 33809970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cost and effectiveness of 3-dimensionally printed model using three different printing layer parameters and two resins.
    Dias Resende CC; Quirino Barbosa TA; Moura GF; Piola Rizzante FA; Mendonça G; Zancopé K; Domingues das Neves F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2023 Feb; 129(2):350-353. PubMed ID: 34218898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Accuracy of stereolithography additive casts used in a digital workflow.
    Al-Imam H; Gram M; Benetti AR; Gotfredsen K
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Apr; 119(4):580-585. PubMed ID: 28781073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.