These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32959191)

  • 21. Rapid and delayed stress effects on recognition of female and male faces.
    Pötzl L; Wolf OT; Merz CJ
    Psychoneuroendocrinology; 2023 Apr; 150():106043. PubMed ID: 36731350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Person information facilitates memory for face identity.
    Mattarozzi K; Colonnello V; Russo PM; Todorov A
    Psychol Res; 2019 Nov; 83(8):1817-1824. PubMed ID: 29948187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Face-to-face: Perceived personal relevance amplifies face processing.
    Bublatzky F; Pittig A; Schupp HT; Alpers GW
    Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci; 2017 May; 12(5):811-822. PubMed ID: 28158672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Medial prefrontal-hippocampal connectivity during emotional memory encoding predicts individual differences in the loss of associative memory specificity.
    Berkers RMWJ; Klumpers F; Fernández G
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Oct; 134 Pt A():44-54. PubMed ID: 26868478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Discrimination and recognition of faces with changed configuration.
    Sandford A; Bindemann M
    Mem Cognit; 2020 Feb; 48(2):287-298. PubMed ID: 31939041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison with others influences encoding and recognition of their faces: Behavioural and ERP evidence.
    Lin H; Liang J
    Neuroimage; 2024 Mar; 288():120538. PubMed ID: 38342189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The influence of autonomic arousal and semantic relatedness on memory for emotional words.
    Buchanan TW; Etzel JA; Adolphs R; Tranel D
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Jul; 61(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 16427713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of encoding instruction and opportunity on the recollection of behaviourally relevant events.
    Broitman AW; Swallow KM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):711-725. PubMed ID: 31747827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Self-referent encoding facilitates memory binding in young children: New insights into the self-reference effect in memory development.
    Andrews G; Murphy K; Dunbar M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2020 Oct; 198():104919. PubMed ID: 32629234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Electrophysiological correlates of face-evoked person knowledge.
    Taylor J; Shehzad Z; McCarthy G
    Biol Psychol; 2016 Jul; 118():136-146. PubMed ID: 27241517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Negative verbal self-relevant feedback is recognized with greater accuracy than facial feedback regardless of depression or social anxiety.
    Houle-Johnson SA; O'Brien B; Ashbaugh AR
    J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry; 2019 Sep; 64():1-8. PubMed ID: 30711826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reduced Enhancement of Memory for Faces Encoded by Semantic and Socioemotional Processes in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.
    Park P; Yamakado H; Takahashi R; Dote S; Ubukata S; Murai T; Tsukiura T
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2020 Apr; 26(4):418-429. PubMed ID: 31822311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. How social interactions affect emotional memory accuracy: Evidence from collaborative retrieval and social contagion paradigms.
    Kensinger EA; Choi HY; Murray BD; Rajaram S
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):706-16. PubMed ID: 26907480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is he important to me? Source memory advantage for personally relevant cheaters.
    Kroneisen M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Jun; 25(3):1129-1137. PubMed ID: 28752377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recognition memory for low- and high-frequency-filtered emotional faces: Low spatial frequencies drive emotional memory enhancement, whereas high spatial frequencies drive the emotion-induced recognition bias.
    Rohr M; Tröger J; Michely N; Uhde A; Wentura D
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jul; 45(5):699-715. PubMed ID: 28213830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Gaze matters! The effect of gaze direction on emotional enhancement of memory for faces in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Okruszek Ł; Bala A; Dziekan M; Szantroch M; Rysz A; Marchel A; Hyniewska S
    Epilepsy Behav; 2017 Jul; 72():35-38. PubMed ID: 28575764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Positive and negative emotional contexts unevenly predict episodic memory.
    Martínez-Galindo JG; Cansino S
    Behav Brain Res; 2015 Sep; 291():89-102. PubMed ID: 26003944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of dimensional models of emotion: evidence from emotions, prototypical events, autobiographical memories, and words.
    Rubin DC; Talarico JM
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):802-8. PubMed ID: 19691001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Social threat and safety learning in individuals with adverse childhood experiences: electrocortical evidence on face processing, recognition, and working memory.
    Schellhaas S; Schmahl C; Bublatzky F
    Eur J Psychotraumatol; 2022; 13(2):2135195. PubMed ID: 36325256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Properties of familiar face representations: Only contrast positive faces contain all information necessary for efficient recognition.
    Wiese H; Chan CYX; Tüttenberg SC
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Sep; 45(9):1583-1598. PubMed ID: 30299131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.