These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32959192)

  • 1. Pretesting boosts recognition, but not cued recall, of targets from unrelated word pairs.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Wills AJ; Hollins TJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):268-273. PubMed ID: 32959192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
    Grimaldi PJ; Karpicke JD
    Mem Cognit; 2012 May; 40(4):505-13. PubMed ID: 22238214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conditions of highly specific learning through cued recall.
    Pan SC; Lovelett J; Stoeckenius D; Rickard TC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Apr; 26(2):634-640. PubMed ID: 30937830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time.
    McKinley GL; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):877-892. PubMed ID: 30725375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple-choice pretesting potentiates learning of related information.
    Little JL; Bjork EL
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Oct; 44(7):1085-101. PubMed ID: 27177505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of the neural correlates of retrieval success in tests of cued recall and recognition memory.
    Okada K; Vilberg KL; Rugg MD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Mar; 33(3):523-33. PubMed ID: 21455941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory asymmetry of forward and backward associations in recognition tasks.
    Yang J; Zhao P; Zhu Z; Mecklinger A; Fang Z; Li H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):253-69. PubMed ID: 22924326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of mediators for the pretesting effect.
    Bartl J; Kliegl O; Bäuml KT
    Memory; 2024 Mar; 32(3):358-368. PubMed ID: 38427707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Why do judgments of learning modify memory? Evidence from identical pairs and relatedness judgments.
    Halamish V; Undorf M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2023 Apr; 49(4):547-556. PubMed ID: 36006723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The benefit of retrieval practice on cued recall under stress depends on item difficulty.
    Klier C; Buratto LG
    Neurosci Lett; 2023 Feb; 797():137066. PubMed ID: 36642238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Electrophysiological evidence for the influence of unitization on the processes engaged during episodic retrieval: enhancing familiarity based remembering.
    Rhodes SM; Donaldson DI
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Jan; 45(2):412-24. PubMed ID: 16930640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dopamine Enhances Item Novelty Detection via Hippocampal and Associative Recall via Left Lateral Prefrontal Cortex Mechanisms.
    Clos M; Bunzeck N; Sommer T
    J Neurosci; 2019 Oct; 39(40):7920-7933. PubMed ID: 31405927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The production effect in paired-associate learning: benefits for item and associative information.
    Putnam AL; Ozubko JD; Macleod CM; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Apr; 42(3):409-20. PubMed ID: 24154982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pretesting boosts item but not source memory.
    Seabrooke T; Mitchell CJ; Hollins TJ
    Memory; 2021 Oct; 29(9):1245-1253. PubMed ID: 34534032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.
    Meade ML; Roediger HL
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Oct; 37(7):962-75. PubMed ID: 19744936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP correlates of intentional forgetting.
    Mecklinger A; Parra M; Waldhauser GT
    Brain Res; 2009 Feb; 1255():132-47. PubMed ID: 19103178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pretesting can be beneficial even when using the internet to answer questions.
    Storm BC; James KK; Stone SM
    Memory; 2022 Apr; 30(4):388-395. PubMed ID: 33596389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diagnosing criterion-level effects on memory: what aspects of memory are enhanced by repeated retrieval?
    Vaughn KE; Rawson KA
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Sep; 22(9):1127-31. PubMed ID: 21813798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Amount, not strength of recollection, drives hippocampal activity: A problem for apparent word familiarity-related hippocampal activation.
    Mayes AR; Montaldi D; Roper A; Migo EM; Gholipour T; Kafkas A
    Hippocampus; 2019 Jan; 29(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 30411437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time.
    Shaffer RA; McDermott KB
    Neuropsychologia; 2020 Feb; 138():107298. PubMed ID: 31838098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.