These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32961384)

  • 1. Feasibility and Clinical Utility of the Finnish Version of the FLACC Pain Scale in PICU.
    Lempinen H; Pölkki T; Kyngäs H; Kaakinen P
    J Pediatr Nurs; 2020; 55():211-216. PubMed ID: 32961384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The COMFORT behavioural scale and the modified FLACC scale in paediatric intensive care.
    Johansson M; Kokinsky E
    Nurs Crit Care; 2009; 14(3):122-30. PubMed ID: 19366409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical validation of FLACC: preverbal patient pain scale.
    Manworren RC; Hynan LS
    Pediatr Nurs; 2003; 29(2):140-6. PubMed ID: 12723828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pain intensity of sedated paediatric intensive care unit patients during treatment and care procedures.
    Akgün D; İnal S
    Nurs Crit Care; 2022 Sep; 27(5):658-666. PubMed ID: 33904220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of nurse accuracy in rating procedural pain among pediatric burn patients using the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Scale.
    Shen J; Giles SA; Kurtovic K; Fabia R; Besner GE; Wheeler KK; Xiang H; Groner JI
    Burns; 2017 Feb; 43(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 27576937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Verifying the validity and reliability of the Japanese version of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability (FLACC) Behavioral Scale.
    Matsuishi Y; Hoshino H; Shimojo N; Enomoto Y; Kido T; Hoshino T; Sumitani M; Inoue Y
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0194094. PubMed ID: 29534083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. P-CPOT: An Adaptation of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool for Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients.
    Tao H; Galagarza SR
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2020 Apr; 21(2):172-178. PubMed ID: 31506237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The FLACC behavioral scale for procedural pain assessment in children aged 5-16 years.
    Nilsson S; Finnström B; Kokinsky E
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2008 Aug; 18(8):767-74. PubMed ID: 18613934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the clinical utility of pain assessment tools for children with cognitive impairment.
    Voepel-Lewis T; Malviya S; Tait AR; Merkel S; Foster R; Krane EJ; Davis PJ
    Anesth Analg; 2008 Jan; 106(1):72-8, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18165556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of the COMFORT Behavior scale and the FLACC scale for pain assessment in Chinese children after cardiac surgery.
    Bai J; Hsu L; Tang Y; van Dijk M
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2012 Mar; 13(1):18-26. PubMed ID: 22341137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability Scale for Pediatric Pain Assessment.
    Peng T; Qu S; Du Z; Chen Z; Xiao T; Chen R
    J Pain Res; 2023; 16():1185-1196. PubMed ID: 37064956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of the faces, legs, activity, cry and consolability scale to assess procedural pain and distress in young children.
    Babl FE; Crellin D; Cheng J; Sullivan TP; O'Sullivan R; Hutchinson A
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2012 Dec; 28(12):1281-96. PubMed ID: 23187981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The FLACC: a behavioral scale for scoring postoperative pain in young children.
    Merkel SI; Voepel-Lewis T; Shayevitz JR; Malviya S
    Pediatr Nurs; 1997; 23(3):293-7. PubMed ID: 9220806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Reliability of the Faces, Legs, Activity, Cry, and Consolability Scale in Assessing Acute Pain in the Pediatric Emergency Department.
    Kochman A; Howell J; Sheridan M; Kou M; Shelton Ryan EE; Lee S; Zettersten W; Yoder L
    Pediatr Emerg Care; 2017 Jan; 33(1):14-17. PubMed ID: 27977532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Psychometric Properties of the FLACC Scale Used to Assess Procedural Pain.
    Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Huque H; Babl FE
    J Pain; 2018 Aug; 19(8):862-872. PubMed ID: 29551662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic review of the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability scale for assessing pain in infants and children: is it reliable, valid, and feasible for use?
    Crellin DJ; Harrison D; Santamaria N; Babl FE
    Pain; 2015 Nov; 156(11):2132-2151. PubMed ID: 26207651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reliability and validity of the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability behavioral tool in assessing acute pain in critically ill patients.
    Voepel-Lewis T; Zanotti J; Dammeyer JA; Merkel S
    Am J Crit Care; 2010 Jan; 19(1):55-61; quiz 62. PubMed ID: 20045849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of the Greek Version of Comfort-B, FLACC, and BPS Scales in Critically Ill Children and Their Association with Clinical Severity.
    Tamvaki E; Efstratiou F; Nteli C; Matziou V; Pavlopoulou I; Myrianthefs P; Papathanassoglou E; Giannakopoulou M
    Pain Manag Nurs; 2020 Oct; 21(5):468-475. PubMed ID: 31862298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Correlation between FLACC scale score and analgesic requirement in children undergoing Minimally Invasive Surgery.
    Turco A; Cerulo M; Del Conte F; Coppola V; Severino G; Escolino M; Esposito C
    Pediatr Med Chir; 2023 May; 45(1):. PubMed ID: 37218458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The revised FLACC observational pain tool: improved reliability and validity for pain assessment in children with cognitive impairment.
    Malviya S; Voepel-Lewis T; Burke C; Merkel S; Tait AR
    Paediatr Anaesth; 2006 Mar; 16(3):258-65. PubMed ID: 16490089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.