These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32962651)

  • 1. Interobserver variability in quality assessment of magnetic resonance images.
    Obuchowicz R; Oszust M; Piorkowski A
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Sep; 20(1):109. PubMed ID: 32962651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A deep learning-based automatic image quality assessment method for respiratory phase on computed tomography chest images.
    Su J; Li M; Lin Y; Xiong L; Yuan C; Zhou Z; Yan K
    Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2024 Mar; 14(3):2240-2254. PubMed ID: 38545050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interobserver variability in the radiological assessment of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) including perfusion MRI in glioblastoma multiforme.
    Kerkhof M; Hagenbeek RE; van der Kallen BF; Lycklama À Nijeholt GJ; Dirven L; Taphoorn MJ; Vos MJ
    Eur J Neurol; 2016 Oct; 23(10):1528-33. PubMed ID: 27424939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Correlation between subjective and objective assessment of magnetic resonance (MR) images.
    Chow LS; Rajagopal H; Paramesran R;
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jul; 34(6):820-831. PubMed ID: 26969762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is multidetector computed tomography comparable to magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of lumbar foraminal stenosis?
    Kang WY; Ahn JM; Lee JW; Lee E; Bae YJ; Seo J; Kim J; Kang HS
    Acta Radiol; 2017 Feb; 58(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 27055917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of quality of temporomandibular joint MR images on interrater agreement.
    Schmitter M; Kress B; Hähnel S; Rammelsberg P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 Jul; 33(4):253-8. PubMed ID: 15533980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The interobserver agreement in the detection of recurrent HNSCC using MRI including diffusion weighted MRI.
    Peltenburg B; Driessen JP; Philippens MEP; Pameijer FA; Castelijns J; Dankbaar JW; Dorgelo B; Lange CAH; Meijer FJA; Palm WM; Roosendaal SD; Steens SCA; Verbist BM; Stegeman I; Janssen LM; de Bree R; Terhaard CHJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Aug; 105():134-140. PubMed ID: 30017269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A consistency evaluation of signal-to-noise ratio in the quality assessment of human brain magnetic resonance images.
    Yu S; Dai G; Wang Z; Li L; Wei X; Xie Y
    BMC Med Imaging; 2018 May; 18(1):17. PubMed ID: 29769079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic Performance and Interreader Agreement of a Standardized MR Imaging Approach in the Prediction of Small Renal Mass Histology.
    Kay FU; Canvasser NE; Xi Y; Pinho DF; Costa DN; Diaz de Leon A; Khatri G; Leyendecker JR; Yokoo T; Lay AH; Kavoussi N; Koseoglu E; Cadeddu JA; Pedrosa I
    Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):543-553. PubMed ID: 29390196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interobserver Variability and Diagnostic Performance of Gadoxetic Acid-enhanced MRI for Predicting Microvascular Invasion in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
    Min JH; Lee MW; Park HS; Lee DH; Park HJ; Lim S; Choi SY; Lee J; Lee JE; Ha SY; Cha DI; Carriere KC; Ahn JH
    Radiology; 2020 Dec; 297(3):573-581. PubMed ID: 32990512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reliability of radiologists' quality assessment of MR pelvic scans.
    Wright JG; McCauley TR; Bell SM; McCarthy S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1992; 16(4):592-6. PubMed ID: 1629419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Qualitative FDG PET Image Assessment Using Automated Three-Segment MR Attenuation Correction Versus CT Attenuation Correction in a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital: A Prospective Study.
    Lyons K; Seghers V; Williams JL; Sorensen JI; Paldino MJ; Krishnamurthy R; Rohren EM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):652-8. PubMed ID: 26295654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interrater and intrarater agreements of magnetic resonance imaging findings in the lumbar spine: significant variability across degenerative conditions.
    Fu MC; Buerba RA; Long WD; Blizzard DJ; Lischuk AW; Haims AH; Grauer JN
    Spine J; 2014 Oct; 14(10):2442-8. PubMed ID: 24642053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic Accuracy of Lumbosacral Spine Magnetic Resonance Image Reading by Chiropractors, Chiropractic Radiologists, and Medical Radiologists.
    de Zoete A; Ostelo R; Knol DL; Algra PR; Wilmink JT; van Tulder MW;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jun; 40(11):E653-60. PubMed ID: 25803219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual Evaluation of Image Quality of a Low Dose 2D/3D Slot Scanner Imaging System Compared to Two Conventional Digital Radiography X-ray Imaging Systems.
    Abdi AJ; Mussmann B; Mackenzie A; Gerke O; Jørgensen GM; Bechsgaard TE; Jensen J; Olsen LB; Andersen PE
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Oct; 11(10):. PubMed ID: 34679630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of Objective Image Quality Metrics to Expert Radiologists' Scoring of Diagnostic Quality of MR Images.
    Mason A; Rioux J; Clarke SE; Costa A; Schmidt M; Keough V; Huynh T; Beyea S
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Apr; 39(4):1064-1072. PubMed ID: 31535985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The impact of subjective image quality evaluation in mammography.
    Alukić E; Homar K; Pavić M; Žibert J; Mekiš N
    Radiography (Lond); 2023 May; 29(3):526-532. PubMed ID: 36913787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Breast Cancer Morphology Using Diffusion-Weighted and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: Intermethod and Interobserver Agreement.
    Radovic N; Ivanac G; Divjak E; Biondic I; Bulum A; Brkljacic B
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 May; 49(5):1381-1390. PubMed ID: 30325549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intra-individual comparison of CAIPIRINHA VIBE technique with conventional VIBE sequences in contrast-enhanced MRI of focal liver lesions.
    Albrecht MH; Bodelle B; Varga-Szemes A; Dewes P; Bucher AM; Ball BD; De Cecco CN; Schoepf UJ; Zhu X; Zangos S; Gruber-Rouh T; Wichmann JL; Lehnert T; Vogl TJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jan; 86():20-25. PubMed ID: 28027748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. No-reference image quality assessment of magnetic resonance images with high-boost filtering and local features.
    Oszust M; Piórkowski A; Obuchowicz R
    Magn Reson Med; 2020 Sep; 84(3):1648-1660. PubMed ID: 32052485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.