These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32962945)

  • 1. Midwifery Job Autonomy in New Zealand: I do it all the time.
    Clemons JH; Gilkison A; Mharapara TL; Dixon L; McAra-Couper J
    Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):30-37. PubMed ID: 32962945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Searching for autonomy.
    Pollard K
    Midwifery; 2003 Jun; 19(2):113-24. PubMed ID: 12809631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Midwifery workplace culture in Australia: A national survey of midwives.
    Catling C; Rossiter C
    Women Birth; 2020 Sep; 33(5):464-472. PubMed ID: 31676324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Midwifery empowerment: National surveys of midwives from Australia, New Zealand and Sweden.
    Hildingsson I; Gamble J; Sidebotham M; Creedy DK; Guilliland K; Dixon L; Pallant J; Fenwick J
    Midwifery; 2016 Sep; 40():62-9. PubMed ID: 27428100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Drivers of job satisfaction in midwifery-A work design approach.
    Mharapara TL; Staniland N; Stadler M; Clemons JH; Dixon L
    Women Birth; 2022 Jul; 35(4):e348-e355. PubMed ID: 34312099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of the satisfaction of midwives' working in midwifery group practice.
    Collins CT; Fereday J; Pincombe J; Oster C; Turnbull D
    Midwifery; 2010 Aug; 26(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 19781827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A story of scrutiny and fear: Australian midwives' experiences of an external review of obstetric services, being involved with litigation and the impact on clinical practice.
    Hood L; Fenwick J; Butt J
    Midwifery; 2010 Jun; 26(3):268-85. PubMed ID: 18804902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experienced job autonomy among maternity care professionals in The Netherlands.
    Perdok H; Cronie D; van der Speld C; van Dillen J; de Jonge A; Rijnders M; de Graaf I; Schellevis FG; Verhoeven CJ
    Midwifery; 2017 Nov; 54():67-72. PubMed ID: 28850826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Midwives' views of caseload midwifery - comparing the caseload and non-caseload midwives' opinions. A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives.
    Newton M; Dawson K; Forster D; McLachlan H
    Women Birth; 2021 Feb; 34(1):e47-e56. PubMed ID: 32653395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Developing midwifery practice through work-based learning: an exploratory study.
    Marshall JE
    Nurse Educ Pract; 2012 Sep; 12(5):273-8. PubMed ID: 22749493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Team midwifery: the views and job satisfaction of midwives.
    Todd CJ; Farquhar MC; Camilleri-Ferrante C
    Midwifery; 1998 Dec; 14(4):214-24. PubMed ID: 10076316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Factors associated with midwives' job satisfaction and experience of work: a cross-sectional survey of midwives in a tertiary maternity hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
    Matthews R; Hyde R; Llewelyn F; Shafiei T; Newton M; Forster DA
    Women Birth; 2022 Mar; 35(2):e153-e162. PubMed ID: 33935006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in midwives' attitudes to their professional role following the implementation of the midwifery development unit.
    Turnbull D; Reid M; McGinley M; Sheilds NR
    Midwifery; 1995 Sep; 11(3):110-9. PubMed ID: 7565154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A woman's hand and a lion's heart: Skills and attributes for rural midwifery practice in New Zealand and Scotland.
    Gilkison A; Rankin J; Kensington M; Daellenbach R; Davies L; Deery R; Crowther S
    Midwifery; 2018 Mar; 58():109-116. PubMed ID: 29331533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Australian midwives' experiences of their workplace culture.
    Catling CJ; Reid F; Hunter B
    Women Birth; 2017 Apr; 30(2):137-145. PubMed ID: 27771321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Factors influencing the clinical decision-making of midwives: a qualitative study.
    Daemers DOA; van Limbeek EBM; Wijnen HAA; Nieuwenhuijze MJ; de Vries RG
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Oct; 17(1):345. PubMed ID: 28985725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How to promote midwives' recognition and professional autonomy? A document analysis study.
    Vermeulen J; Buyl R; Luyben A; Fleming V; Tency I; Fobelets M
    Midwifery; 2024 Nov; 138():104138. PubMed ID: 39146900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Women-with-midwives-with-women: a model of interdependence.
    Fleming VE
    Midwifery; 1998 Sep; 14(3):137-43. PubMed ID: 9856020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midwives' care on a labour ward prior to the introduction of a midwifery model of care: a field of tension.
    Nilsson C; Olafsdottir OA; Lundgren I; Berg M; Dellenborg L
    Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being; 2019 Dec; 14(1):1593037. PubMed ID: 30924414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Problematising public and private work spaces: midwives' work in hospitals and in homes.
    Bourgeault IL; Sutherns R; Macdonald M; Luce J
    Midwifery; 2012 Oct; 28(5):582-90. PubMed ID: 22925395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.