These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32963139)
1. [Estimation of Dynamic MLC Parameters Using Dynamic MLC Position Accuracy Analysis Software in Prostate IMRT]. Shirosaki N; Takemura A Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2020; 76(9):936-943. PubMed ID: 32963139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system. Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementation of phantom-less IMRT delivery verification using Varian DynaLog files and R/V output. Agnew CE; King RB; Hounsell AR; McGarry CK Phys Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 57(21):6761-77. PubMed ID: 23032423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Consideration of Dose Error in Dynamic MLC IMRT Using MLC Speed Control with Dose Rate Change]. Kojima H; Takigami M; Asano T; Hatanaka Y; Aizawa K; Ishikawa M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2017; 73(5):382-388. PubMed ID: 28529252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Testing of dynamic multileaf collimator by dynamic log file]. Ono K; Nakamura T; Yamato S; Miyazawa M Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2007 Jul; 63(7):766-73. PubMed ID: 17917338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The impact of leaf width and plan complexity on DMLC tracking of prostate intensity modulated arc therapy. Pommer T; Falk M; Poulsen PR; Keall PJ; O'Brien RT; Munck af Rosenschöld P Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111717. PubMed ID: 24320425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Planning, delivery, and quality assurance of intensity-modulated radiotherapy using dynamic multileaf collimator: a strategy for large-scale implementation for the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate. Burman C; Chui CS; Kutcher G; Leibel S; Zelefsky M; LoSasso T; Spirou S; Wu Q; Yang J; Stein J; Mohan R; Fuks Z; Ling CC Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Nov; 39(4):863-73. PubMed ID: 9369136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Monte Carlo based IMRT dose verification using MLC log files and R/V outputs. Luo W; Li J; Price RA; Chen L; Yang J; Fan J; Chen Z; McNeeley S; Xu X; Ma CM Med Phys; 2006 Jul; 33(7):2557-64. PubMed ID: 16898460 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. IMRT implementation and patient specific dose verification with film and ion chamber array detectors. Sathiyan S; Ravikumar M; Varatharaj C; Supe SS; Keshava SL Gulf J Oncolog; 2010 Jul; (8):20-7. PubMed ID: 20601335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Accuracy of dynamic multileaf position and influence of beam profile according to change in dose monitor unit in QA plan of intensity modulated radiotherapy]. Okumura M; Hashiba H; Hayakumo R; Shintani N; Matsumoto K; Sumita M; Murano Y Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jun; 58(6):773-82. PubMed ID: 12518098 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intensity modulated radiotherapy dose delivery error from radiation field offset inaccuracy. Kung JH; Chen GT Med Phys; 2000 Jul; 27(7):1617-22. PubMed ID: 10947265 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Effects of Low MU in Respiratory Gated IMRT on MLC Position Accuracy and Dose Distribution]. Kanai K; Kotabe K; Kijima K; Yamada Y; Takahashi Y; Nakayama H Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2018; 74(6):563-571. PubMed ID: 29925751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Experimental verification of a Monte Carlo-based MLC simulation model for IMRT dose calculation. Tyagi N; Moran JM; Litzenberg DW; Bielajew AF; Fraass BA; Chetty IJ Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):651-63. PubMed ID: 17388183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality assurance for online adapted treatment plans: benchmarking and delivery monitoring simulation. Li T; Wu Q; Yang Y; Rodrigues A; Yin FF; Jackie Wu Q Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 42(1):381-90. PubMed ID: 25563278 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of the individual multileaf collimator positional deviations during dynamic IMRT delivery priori with artificial neural network. Osman AFI; Maalej NM; Jayesh K Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1421-1430. PubMed ID: 31922604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-unit variability of multi-leaf collimator parameters for IMRT and VMAT treatment planning: a multi-institutional survey. Isono M; Akino Y; Mizuno H; Tanaka Y; Masai N; Yamamoto T J Radiat Res; 2020 Mar; 61(2):307-313. PubMed ID: 31927580 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of MLC positioning deviations using log files and establishment of specific assessment parameters for different accelerators with IMRT and VMAT. Lin X; Sun T; Liu X; Zhang G; Yin Y Radiat Oncol; 2022 Jul; 17(1):123. PubMed ID: 35842671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer. Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An extensive log-file analysis of step-and-shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy segment delivery errors. Stell AM; Li JG; Zeidan OA; Dempsey JF Med Phys; 2004 Jun; 31(6):1593-602. PubMed ID: 15259664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Implementation and Evaluation of Phantomless Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Delivery Verification Using FractionCHECK. Reddy BR; Ravikumar M; Varatharaj C; Childress N; Vivek TR Gulf J Oncolog; 2019 Sep; 1(31):26-35. PubMed ID: 31591988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]