These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32963140)

  • 21. Radiation dose and image quality in diagnostic radiology. Optimization of the dose-image quality relationship with clinical experience from scoliosis radiography, coronary intervention and a flat-panel digital detector.
    Geijer H
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 2002 Mar; 43(427):1-43. PubMed ID: 12108231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention.
    Nakamura S; Kobayashi T; Funatsu A; Okada T; Mauti M; Waizumi Y; Yamada S
    Heart Vessels; 2016 May; 31(5):655-63. PubMed ID: 25840815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiation Doses to Patients in Interventional Coronary Procedures-Estimation of Updated National Reference Levels by Dose Audit.
    Georges JL; Belle L; Etard C; Azowa JB; Albert F; Pansieri M; Monsegu J; Barbou F; Trouillet C; Leddet P; Livarek B; Marcaggi X; Hanssen M; Cattan S; The Ray'act-Investigators
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2017 Jun; 175(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 27624893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Evaluation and estimation of entrance skin dose in patients during diagnostic and interventional radiology procedures].
    Iida H; Horii J; Chabatake M; Taka E; Shimizu M; Mizushima T
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2004 Jan; 60(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 15041915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Real-time measurement of radiation exposure to patients during diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous interventional procedures.
    Cusma JT; Bell MR; Wondrow MA; Taubel JP; Holmes DR
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1999 Feb; 33(2):427-35. PubMed ID: 9973023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Determinants of fluoroscopy time for invasive coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: insights from the NCDR(®).
    Fazel R; Curtis J; Wang Y; Einstein AJ; Smith-Bindman R; Tsai TT; Chen J; Shah ND; Krumholz HM; Nallamothu BK
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Dec; 82(7):1091-105. PubMed ID: 23703793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fluoroscopy pulse rate reduction during diagnostic and therapeutic imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: An evaluation of radiation dose, procedure complications and outcomes.
    Hansen JW; Foy A; Schmidt T; Ghahramani M; Chambers CE
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 89(4):665-670. PubMed ID: 27121130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Patient Radiation Dose for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention by Treatment Area: Dosimetry Using DRLs 2020].
    Masubuchi Y; Chida K; Inaba Y; Kageyama M; Shimada S; Yamashita A
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2022 Nov; 78(11):1306-1313. PubMed ID: 36198569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time-Course Reduction in Patient Exposure to Radiation From Coronary Interventional Procedures: The Greater Paris Area Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry.
    Georges JL; Karam N; Tafflet M; Livarek B; Bataille S; Loyeau A; Mapouata M; Benamer H; Caussin C; Garot P; Varenne O; Barbou F; Teiger E; Funck F; Karrillon G; Lambert Y; Spaulding C; Jouven X;
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28801540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Radiation exposure and contrast agent use related to radial versus femoral arterial access during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-Results of the FERARI study.
    Becher T; Behnes M; Ünsal M; Baumann S; El-Battrawy I; Fastner C; Kuschyk J; Papavassiliu T; Hoffmann U; Mashayekhi K; Borggrefe M; Akin I
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2016 Dec; 17(8):505-509. PubMed ID: 27350417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Reference levels at European level for cardiac interventional procedures.
    Padovani R; Vano E; Trianni A; Bokou C; Bosmans H; Bor D; Jankowski J; Torbica P; Kepler K; Dowling A; Milu C; Tsapaki V; Salat D; Vassileva J; Faulkner K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):104-7. PubMed ID: 18310612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Radiation dose reduction in the cardiac catheterization laboratory utilizing a novel protocol.
    Wassef AW; Hiebert B; Ravandi A; Ducas J; Minhas K; Vo M; Kass M; Parmar G; Hussain F
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 May; 7(5):550-7. PubMed ID: 24746655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Effect of Low Frame Rate Fluoroscopy on the X-ray Dose during Coronary Intervention.
    Sadamatsu K; Nakano Y
    Intern Med; 2016; 55(15):1943-6. PubMed ID: 27477397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Efficacy of Low-Dose Compared With Standard-Dose Radiation for Cardiac Catheterization and Intervention (KAR RAD Study).
    Kar S; Teleb M; Albaghdadi A; Ibrahim A; Mukherjee D
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2019 Jun; 31(6):187-194. PubMed ID: 30865914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of radiological risk during coronary angioplasty procedures: comparison of transradial and transfemoral approaches.
    Iwachow P; Miechowicz I; Kałmucki P; Dziki B; Szyszka A; Baszko A; Siminiak T
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Sep; 33(9):1297-1303. PubMed ID: 28364175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Evaluation of patient entrance dose rate of interventional X-ray equipment].
    Miyazaki S; Abe S; Katoh Y; Kobayashi H; Uehara H
    Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2003 Jul; 59(7):839-47. PubMed ID: 12937405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A MULTICENTRE SURVEY OF LOCAL DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS AND ACHIEVABLE DOSE FOR CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY INTERVENTION PROCEDURES IN KOREA.
    Kim JS; Lee BK; Ryu DR; Chun KJ; Choi HH; Roh Y; Kwon SM; Cho BR
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Dec; 187(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 31605144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [X-Ray, false friend of the interventional cardiologist - Risks, evaluation, quality improvement - Status report from France-PCI registry].
    Périer DM; Seret DG; Morelle DJF; Amabile DN; Duheil DG; Monségu PJ; Durel DN; Tixier DV; Honton DB; Py DA; Barone-Rochette PG; Chanseaume DS; Rias DS; Adjedj DJ; Shararah DA; Motreff PP; Rangé DG; Benamer DH
    Ann Cardiol Angeiol (Paris); 2021 Dec; 70(6):416-424. PubMed ID: 34732280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduction of radiation exposure during complex interventions for chronic total coronary occlusions: Implementing low dose radiation protocols without affecting procedural success rates.
    Werner GS; Glaser P; Coenen A; Moehlis H; Tischer KH; Koch M; Klingenbeck R
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 May; 89(6):1005-1012. PubMed ID: 28112448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy of radiation dose reduction due to real-time monitoring and visualization of peak skin dose during coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Ichimoto E; Kadohira T; Nakayama T; De Gregorio J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Mar; 91(4):717-722. PubMed ID: 28557313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.