These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32964181)

  • 1. An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    J Cogn; 2020 Sep; 3(1):22. PubMed ID: 32964181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Erasing the Homunculus as an Ongoing Mission: A Reply to the Commentaries.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B; De Houwer J
    J Cogn; 2020 Sep; 3(1):28. PubMed ID: 32964186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Has "Erasing" Made Things Clearer? Commentary on Schmidt, Liefooghe & De Houwer (): "An Episodic Model of Task Switching Effects: Erasing the Homunculus from Memory".
    Koch I; Lavric A
    J Cogn; 2020 Jul; 3(1):16. PubMed ID: 32743338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. PEP Does Not Dispense with but Implements Task-Set Reconfiguration. Can It Handle Phenomena More Diagnostic of Endogenous Control?
    Monsell S; McLaren I
    J Cogn; 2020 Sep; 3(1):27. PubMed ID: 32964185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feature Integration and Task Switching: Diminished Switch Costs after Controlling for Stimulus, Response, and Cue Repetitions.
    Schmidt JR; Liefooghe B
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(3):e0151188. PubMed ID: 26964102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Contextual Features of the Cue Enter Episodic Bindings in Task Switching.
    Benini E; Koch I; Mayr S; Frings C; Philipp AM
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):29. PubMed ID: 36072099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Explaining response-repetition effects in task switching: evidence from switching cue modality suggests episodic binding and response inhibition.
    Koch I; Frings C; Schuch S
    Psychol Res; 2018 May; 82(3):570-579. PubMed ID: 28286905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Small Platoon of Idiots Have Been Allowed to Flourish, but the Homunculus Has Not Been Erased from Memory.
    Longman CS
    J Cogn; 2020 Sep; 3(1):23. PubMed ID: 32964182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Parallel Episodic Processing (PEP) model 2.0: A single computational model of stimulus-response binding, contingency learning, power curves, and mixing costs.
    Schmidt JR; De Houwer J; Rothermund K
    Cogn Psychol; 2016 Dec; 91():82-108. PubMed ID: 27821256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining binding effects on task switch costs and response-repetition effects: Variations of the cue modality and stimulus modality in task switching.
    Kandalowski SRM; Seibold JC; Schuch S; Koch I
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 May; 82(4):1632-1643. PubMed ID: 31820281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analogous selection processes in declarative and procedural working memory: N-2 list-repetition and task-repetition costs.
    Gade M; Souza AS; Druey MD; Oberauer K
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Jan; 45(1):26-39. PubMed ID: 27517876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Distinguishing between inhibitory and episodic processing accounts of switch-cost asymmetries.
    Wong J; Leboe JP
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2009 Mar; 63(1):8-23. PubMed ID: 19271811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching.
    Grange JA; Kowalczyk AW; O'Loughlin R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1568-1583. PubMed ID: 28383961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching: a diffusion model analysis.
    Kowalczyk AW; Grange JA
    Psychol Res; 2020 Oct; 84(7):1965-1999. PubMed ID: 31177315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Same same but different? Modeling N-1 switch cost and N-2 repetition cost with the diffusion model and the linear ballistic accumulator model.
    Hartmann EM; Rey-Mermet A; Gade M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102858. PubMed ID: 31276962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Investigating a method for reducing residual switch costs in cued task switching.
    Schneider DW
    Mem Cognit; 2016 Jul; 44(5):762-77. PubMed ID: 26833200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Repetition costs in task switching are not equal to cue switching costs: evidence from a cue-independent context.
    Benini E; Koch I; Philipp AM
    Psychol Res; 2024 Apr; 88(3):910-920. PubMed ID: 38112804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N-2 Repetition Costs in Task Switching: Task Inhibition or Interference Between Task Episodes?
    Schuch S; Keppler E
    J Cogn; 2022; 5(1):48. PubMed ID: 36382216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Task rule-congruency and Simon-like effects in switching between spatial tasks.
    Meiran N
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2005 Aug; 58(6):1023-41. PubMed ID: 16194946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alpha and Beta Oscillations Differentially Support Word Production in a Rule-Switching Task.
    Zioga I; Zhou YJ; Weissbart H; Martin AE; Haegens S
    eNeuro; 2024 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 38490743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.