191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32964259)
1. Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer?
Benoit L; Koual M; Nguyen-Xuan HT; Balaya V; Nos C; Montero-Macías R; Bats AS
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Jan; 303(1):231-239. PubMed ID: 32964259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The efficacy of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer: A meta-analysis.
Wang Y; Ma B; Li W; Li P
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2023 Nov; 49(11):106995. PubMed ID: 37527959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.
Kim SI; Choi BR; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Choi CH; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Mar; 164(3):535-542. PubMed ID: 34969535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Preoperative Conization May Have a Positive Impact on Survival in Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Study.
Li J; Gong X; Li P; Ouyang X; Chang X; Tang J
Oncol Res Treat; 2021; 44(12):710-718. PubMed ID: 34610605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conization before radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer: A Korean multicenter study (COBRA-R).
Kim SI; Nam SH; Hwangbo S; Kim Y; Cho HW; Suh DH; Song JY; Kim JW; Choi CH; Kim DY; Lee M
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Jun; 173():88-97. PubMed ID: 37105062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Is minimally invasive radical surgery safe for patients with cervical cancer ≤2 cm in size? (MISAFE): Gynecologic Oncology Research Investigators coLLborAtion study (GORILLA-1003).
Kong TW; Kim J; Son JH; Lee AJ; Yang EJ; Shim SH; Kim NK; Kim Y; Suh DH; Hwang DW; Park SJ; Kim HS; Lee YY; Yoo JG; Lee SJ; Chang SJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 176():122-129. PubMed ID: 37515926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The clinical outcome of patients with stage Ia1 and Ia2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a Cooperation Task Force (CTF) study.
Gadducci A; Sartori E; Maggino T; Landoni F; Zola P; Cosio S; Pasinetti B; Alessi C; Maneo A; Ferrero A
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2003; 24(6):513-6. PubMed ID: 14658592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.
Casarin J; Buda A; Bogani G; Fanfani F; Papadia A; Ceccaroni M; Malzoni M; Pellegrino A; Ferrari F; Greggi S; Uccella S; Pinelli C; Cromi A; Ditto A; Di Martino G; Anchora LP; Falcone F; Bonfiglio F; Odicino F; Mueller M; Scambia G; Raspagliesi F; Landoni F; Ghezzi F
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Oct; 159(1):164-170. PubMed ID: 32665147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.
Levine MD; Brown J; Crane EK; Tait DL; Naumann RW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 Apr; 28(4):824-828. PubMed ID: 32730990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Protective effect of pre-operative conization in patients undergoing surgical treatment for early-stage cervical cancer.
Gennari P; Tchaikovski S; Mészáros J; Gerken M; Klinkhammer-Schalke M; Toth G; Ortmann O; Eggemann H; Ignatov A
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Jul; 166(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 35618539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of outcomes between abdominal, minimally invasive and combined vaginal-laparoscopic hysterectomy in patients with stage IAI/IA2 cervical cancer: 4C (Canadian Cervical Cancer Collaborative) study.
Piedimonte S; Pond GR; Plante M; Nelson G; Kwon J; Altman A; Feigenberg T; Elit L; Lau S; Sabourin J; Willows K; Aubrey C; Jang JH; Teo-Fortin LA; Cockburn N; Saunders NB; Shamiya S; Helpman L; Vicus D;
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Aug; 166(2):230-235. PubMed ID: 35644731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA1 cervical cancer.
Wang X; Bi Y; Wu H; Wu M; Li L
Sci Rep; 2020 Nov; 10(1):19920. PubMed ID: 33199765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term oncological outcomes and recurrence patterns in early-stage cervical cancer treated with minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy: The Norwegian Radium Hospital experience.
Sert BM; Kristensen GB; Kleppe A; Dørum A
Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Aug; 162(2):284-291. PubMed ID: 34083029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adjuvant hysterectomy following primary chemoradiation for stage IB2 and IIA2 cervical cancer: a retrospective comparison of complications for open versus minimally invasive surgery.
Miller H; Matsuo K; Roman LD; Yessaian AA; Pham HQ; Hom M; Castaneda A; Pham A; Ragab O; Muderspach L; Ciccone M; Brunette LL
Radiat Oncol; 2021 Jun; 16(1):123. PubMed ID: 34187504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early cervical cancer: A two-center retrospective cohort study with pathologic review of usual-type adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinoma.
Kim Y; Kim SI; Kim H; Lee M; Kim HS; Kim K; Chung HH; No JH; Kim YB; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS; Lee C; Suh DH
Gynecol Oncol; 2022 Oct; 167(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 35970602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surveillance of radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer in the early experienced period of minimally invasive surgery in Japan.
Ohta T; Nagase S; Okui Y; Enomoto T; Yamagami W; Mikami M; Tokunaga H; Ino K; Ushijima K; Shozu M; Tashiro H; Mandai M; Miyamoto S; Morishige KI; Yoshida Y; Yoshino K; Saito T; Kobayashi E; Kobayashi H; Takekuma M; Terai Y; Fujii T; Kanao H; Aoki D; Katabuchi H; Yaegashi N
Int J Clin Oncol; 2021 Dec; 26(12):2318-2330. PubMed ID: 34435284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Conservative treatment of stage IA1 adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix with a long-term follow-up.
Yahata T; Nishino K; Kashima K; Sekine M; Fujita K; Sasagawa M; Honma S; Kodama S; Tanaka K
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Aug; 20(6):1063-6. PubMed ID: 20683418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy.
Chacon E; Manzour N; Zanagnolo V; Querleu D; Núñez-Córdoba JM; Martin-Calvo N; Căpîlna ME; Fagotti A; Kucukmetin A; Mom C; Chakalova G; Shamistan A; Gil Moreno A; Malzoni M; Narducci F; Arencibia O; Raspagliesi F; Toptas T; Cibula D; Kaidarova D; Meydanli MM; Tavares M; Golub D; Perrone AM; Poka R; Tsolakidis D; Vujić G; Jedryka MA; Zusterzeel PLM; Beltman JJ; Goffin F; Haidopoulos D; Haller H; Jach R; Yezhova I; Berlev I; Bernardino M; Bharathan R; Lanner M; Maenpaa MM; Sukhin V; Feron JG; Fruscio R; Kukk K; Ponce J; Minguez JA; Vázquez-Vicente D; Castellanos T; Boria F; Alcazar JL; Chiva L; ;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2022 Feb; 32(2):117-124. PubMed ID: 35039455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
