191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32964601)
1. Effect of Anti-Rotational Abutment Features and Novel Computerized Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings.
Aktas G; Guncu MB; Akcin ET; Cakan U; Canay S
J Prosthodont; 2021 Mar; 30(3):252-256. PubMed ID: 32964601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of manufacturing techniques on the marginal and internal fit of cobalt-chromium implant-supported multiunit frameworks.
Akçin ET; Güncü MB; Aktaş G; Aslan Y
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):715-720. PubMed ID: 30017153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of porcelain firing and cementation on the marginal fit of implant-supported metal-ceramic restorations fabricated by additive or subtractive manufacturing methods.
Yildirim B
J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Oct; 124(4):476.e1-476.e6. PubMed ID: 32451142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Marginal and Internal Fit of Implant-Supported Metal Copings Fabricated with 3 Different Techniques: An In Vitro Study.
Yildirim B; Paken G
J Prosthodont; 2019 Mar; 28(3):315-320. PubMed ID: 30667169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Effect of Milling Metal Versus Milling Wax on Implant Framework Retention and Adaptation.
Ghodsi S; Pirmoazen S; Beyabanaki E; Rostami M; Alikhasi M
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):e739-e743. PubMed ID: 29855135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Effect of Different Wax Pattern Fabrication Techniques on the Marginal Fit of Customized Lithium Disilicate Implant Abutments.
Taha D; Nour M; Zohdy M; El-Etreby A; Hamdy A; Salah T
J Prosthodont; 2019 Dec; 28(9):1018-1023. PubMed ID: 31573716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of production method on surface roughness, marginal and internal fit, and retention of cobalt-chromium single crowns.
Lövgren N; Roxner R; Klemendz S; Larsson C
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jul; 118(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 28024818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Accuracy of CAD-CAM milling versus conventional lost-wax casting for single metal copings: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Yang J; Li H
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jul; 132(1):51-58. PubMed ID: 35788274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of the fit of zirconia copings fabricated by direct and indirect digital scanning procedures.
Lee B; Oh KC; Haam D; Lee JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):225-231. PubMed ID: 29428522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The effect of different fabrication steps on the marginal adaptation of two types of glass-infiltrated ceramic crown copings fabricated by CAD/CAM technology.
Alghazzawi TF; Liu PR; Essig ME
J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22372838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of digitizing techniques on the fit of implant-retained crowns with different antirotational abutment features.
Aktas G; Özcan N; Aydin DH; Şahin E; Akça K
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):367-72. PubMed ID: 24360015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of marginal fit of single implant-supported metal-ceramic crowns prepared by using presintered metal blocks.
Pasali B; Sarac D; Kaleli N; Sarac YS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):257-262. PubMed ID: 28545869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A microcomputed tomography evaluation of the marginal fit of cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated by new manufacturing techniques and alloy systems.
Kim EH; Lee DH; Kwon SM; Kwon TY
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):393-399. PubMed ID: 27677219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical marginal and internal fit of metal ceramic crowns fabricated with a selective laser melting technology.
Huang Z; Zhang L; Zhu J; Zhang X
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jun; 113(6):623-7. PubMed ID: 25794918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of the fit of metal copings fabricated using stereolithography.
Kim SB; Kim NH; Kim JH; Moon HS
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Nov; 120(5):693-698. PubMed ID: 29807735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison and evaluation of marginal and internal gaps in cobalt-chromium alloy copings fabricated using subtractive and additive manufacturing.
Kim DY; Kim JH; Kim HY; Kim WC
J Prosthodont Res; 2018 Jan; 62(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 28663024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dental implant-abutment fracture resistance and wear induced by single-unit screw-retained CAD components fabricated by four CAM methods after mechanical cycling.
Markarian RA; Galles DP; França FMG
J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Sep; 128(3):450-457. PubMed ID: 33640089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of marginal and internal fit of three-unit implant-supported fixed prosthetic substructures fabricated using CAD/CAM systems.
Kayikci O; Ates SM
Clin Oral Investig; 2022 Feb; 26(2):1283-1291. PubMed ID: 34331593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Influence of manufacturing technique on marginal fit of cobalt chromium restorations: An
Sarda AS; Bedia SV
Indian J Dent Res; 2021; 32(4):495-499. PubMed ID: 35645078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of repeated firing on the marginal accuracy of Co-Cr copings fabricated by selective laser melting.
Zeng L; Zhang Y; Liu Z; Wei B
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 25444279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
