These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 32965634)

  • 1. Value of Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS criteria in ruling out clinically important cervical spine injuries: derivation of modified Canadian C-spine rule.
    Ghelichkhani P; Shahsavarinia K; Gharekhani A; Taghizadieh A; Baratloo A; Fattah FHR; Abbasi N; Gubari MIM; Faridaalee G; Dinpanah H; Yekaninejad MS; Esmaeili A; Jones ME; Askarian-Amiri S; Yousefifard M; Hosseini M
    Radiol Med; 2021 Mar; 126(3):414-420. PubMed ID: 32965634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Triage tools for detecting cervical spine injury in pediatric trauma patients.
    Slaar A; Fockens MM; Wang J; Maas M; Wilson DJ; Goslings JC; Schep NW; van Rijn RR
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD011686. PubMed ID: 29215711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retrospective application of the NEXUS low-risk criteria for cervical spine radiography in Canadian emergency departments.
    Dickinson G; Stiell IG; Schull M; Brison R; Clement CM; Vandemheen KL; Cass D; McKnight D; Greenberg G; Worthington JR; Reardon M; Morrison L; Eisenhauer MA; Dreyer J; Wells GA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2004 Apr; 43(4):507-14. PubMed ID: 15039695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of the Canadian C-spine rule and NEXUS to screen for clinically important cervical spine injury in patients following blunt trauma: a systematic review.
    Michaleff ZA; Maher CG; Verhagen AP; Rebbeck T; Lin CW
    CMAJ; 2012 Nov; 184(16):E867-76. PubMed ID: 23048086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Canadian C-spine rule performs better than unstructured physician judgment.
    Bandiera G; Stiell IG; Wells GA; Clement C; De Maio V; Vandemheen KL; Greenberg GH; Lesiuk H; Brison R; Cass D; Dreyer J; Eisenhauer MA; Macphail I; McKnight RD; Morrison L; Reardon M; Schull M; Worthington J;
    Ann Emerg Med; 2003 Sep; 42(3):395-402. PubMed ID: 12944893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Projected paediatric cervical spine imaging rates with application of NEXUS, Canadian C-Spine and PECARN clinical decision rules in a prospective Australian cohort.
    Phillips N; Rasmussen K; McGuire S; Abel KA; Acworth J; Askin G; Brady R; Walsh M; Babl FE
    Emerg Med J; 2021 May; 38(5):330-337. PubMed ID: 34449409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical spine trauma - Evaluating the diagnostic power of CT, MRI, X-Ray and LODOX.
    Rutsch N; Amrein P; Exadaktylos AK; Benneker LM; Schmaranzer F; Müller M; Albers CE; Bigdon SF
    Injury; 2023 Jul; 54(7):110771. PubMed ID: 37164902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Yield of computed tomography of the cervical spine in cases of simple assault.
    Uriell ML; Allen JW; Lovasik BP; Benayoun MD; Spandorfer RM; Holder CA
    Injury; 2017 Jan; 48(1):133-136. PubMed ID: 27842904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Canadian C-spine rule for radiography in alert and stable trauma patients.
    Stiell IG; Wells GA; Vandemheen KL; Clement CM; Lesiuk H; De Maio VJ; Laupacis A; Schull M; McKnight RD; Verbeek R; Brison R; Cass D; Dreyer J; Eisenhauer MA; Greenberg GH; MacPhail I; Morrison L; Reardon M; Worthington J
    JAMA; 2001 Oct; 286(15):1841-8. PubMed ID: 11597285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children.
    Viccellio P; Simon H; Pressman BD; Shah MN; Mower WR; Hoffman JR;
    Pediatrics; 2001 Aug; 108(2):E20. PubMed ID: 11483830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Canadian C-spine rule versus the NEXUS low-risk criteria in patients with trauma.
    Stiell IG; Clement CM; McKnight RD; Brison R; Schull MJ; Rowe BH; Worthington JR; Eisenhauer MA; Cass D; Greenberg G; MacPhail I; Dreyer J; Lee JS; Bandiera G; Reardon M; Holroyd B; Lesiuk H; Wells GA
    N Engl J Med; 2003 Dec; 349(26):2510-8. PubMed ID: 14695411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prospective derivation of a clinical decision rule for thoracolumbar spine evaluation after blunt trauma: An American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Multi-Institutional Trials Group Study.
    Inaba K; Nosanov L; Menaker J; Bosarge P; Williams L; Turay D; Cachecho R; de Moya M; Bukur M; Carl J; Kobayashi L; Kaminski S; Beekley A; Gomez M; Skiada D;
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Mar; 78(3):459-65; discussion 465-7. PubMed ID: 25710414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multicentre prospective validation of use of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by triage nurses in the emergency department.
    Stiell IG; Clement CM; O'Connor A; Davies B; Leclair C; Sheehan P; Clavet T; Beland C; MacKenzie T; Wells GA
    CMAJ; 2010 Aug; 182(11):1173-9. PubMed ID: 20457772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cervical spinal clearance: A prospective Western Trauma Association Multi-institutional Trial.
    Inaba K; Byerly S; Bush LD; Martin MJ; Martin DT; Peck KA; Barmparas G; Bradley MJ; Hazelton JP; Coimbra R; Choudhry AJ; Brown CV; Ball CG; Cherry-Bukowiec JR; Burlew CC; Joseph B; Dunn J; Minshall CT; Carrick MM; Berg GM; Demetriades D;
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2016 Dec; 81(6):1122-1130. PubMed ID: 27438681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The out-of-hospital validation of the Canadian C-Spine Rule by paramedics.
    Vaillancourt C; Stiell IG; Beaudoin T; Maloney J; Anton AR; Bradford P; Cain E; Travers A; Stempien M; Lees M; Munkley D; Battram E; Banek J; Wells GA
    Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 54(5):663-671.e1. PubMed ID: 19394111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Canadian C-spine Rule versus NEXUS in Screening of Clinically Important Traumatic Cervical Spine Injuries; a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Vazirizadeh-Mahabadi M; Yarahmadi M
    Arch Acad Emerg Med; 2023; 11(1):e5. PubMed ID: 36620739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective Validation of Modified NEXUS Cervical Spine Injury Criteria in Low-risk Elderly Fall Patients.
    Tran J; Jeanmonod D; Agresti D; Hamden K; Jeanmonod RK
    West J Emerg Med; 2016 May; 17(3):252-7. PubMed ID: 27330655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The NEXUS criteria: do they stand the test of time?
    Collins NC; McKenzie JV
    Eur J Emerg Med; 2013 Feb; 20(1):58-60. PubMed ID: 22228252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of the sensitivity of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS) Head computed tomographic (CT) decision instrument for selective imaging of blunt head injury patients: An observational study.
    Mower WR; Gupta M; Rodriguez R; Hendey GW
    PLoS Med; 2017 Jul; 14(7):e1002313. PubMed ID: 28700585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Utility of computed tomographic imaging of the cervical spine in trauma evaluation of ground-level fall.
    Benayoun MD; Allen JW; Lovasik BP; Uriell ML; Spandorfer RM; Holder CA
    J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2016 Aug; 81(2):339-44. PubMed ID: 27454805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.